World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
7195
World Ranking
11086
National Ranking
23

Michal Wozniak publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michal Wozniak sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 264 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Michal Wozniak D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michal Wozniak sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michal Wozniak is affiliated with Wrocław University of Science and Technology in Poland and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science, particularly in artificial intelligence and data stream mining techniques. Their research spans several subfields including computer vision and pattern recognition, electrical and electronic engineering, information systems, and sociology and political science.

Throughout their career, Michal Wozniak has focused on topics such as data stream mining techniques, imbalanced data classification techniques, anomaly detection applications, machine learning and data classification, misinformation and its impacts, electricity theft detection techniques, as well as spam and phishing detection.

Their recent publications include:

  • Advanced Machine Learning techniques for fake news (online disinformation) detection: A systematic mapping study, 2020, Applied Soft Computing
  • Preprocessed dynamic classifier ensemble selection for highly imbalanced drifted data streams, 2020, Information Fusion
  • How to design the fair experimental classifier evaluation, 2021, Applied Soft Computing
  • Hellinger Distance Weighted Ensemble for imbalanced data stream classification, 2021, Journal of Computational Science
  • Technical solution to counter potential crime: Text analysis to detect fake news and disinformation, 2022, Journal of Computational Science

Frequent collaborators of Michal Wozniak include Paweł Ksieniewicz, Michał Choraś, Paweł Zyblewski, Jędrzej Kozal, and Jakub Klikowski, with multiple coauthored papers.

The primary venues where Michal Wozniak publishes their research consist of arXiv (Cornell University), Applied Soft Computing, Information Fusion, SSRN Electronic Journal, and Journal of Computational Science.

Michal Wozniak has also contributed to academic books published by Springer Science+Business Media, including titles on machine learning and metaheuristics algorithms from 2020 and 2021.

Best Publications

  • Ensemble learning for data stream analysis

    Bartosz Krawczyk;Leandro L. Minku;Joo Gama;Jerzy Stefanowski

  • A survey of multiple classifier systems as hybrid systems

    Michał Woniak;Manuel Graña;Emilio Corchado

  • Cost-sensitive decision tree ensembles for effective imbalanced classification

    Bartosz Krawczyk;Michał Woniak;Gerald Schaefer

  • Analyzing the oversampling of different classes and types of examples in multi-class imbalanced datasets

    José A. Sáez;Bartosz Krawczyk;Michał Woźniak

  • Computer Recognition Systems 3

    Marek Kurzynski;Michal Wozniak

  • Clustering-based ensembles for one-class classification

    Bartosz Krawczyk;Michał Woniak;Bogusław Cyganek

  • Radial-Based oversampling for noisy imbalanced data classification

    Michał Koziarski;Bartosz Krawczyk;Michał Woźniak

  • Advanced Machine Learning techniques for fake news (online disinformation) detection: A systematic mapping study

    Michal Choras;Konstantinos P. Demestichas;Agata Gielczyk;Álvaro Herrero

  • Radial-Based Oversampling for Multiclass Imbalanced Data Classification

    Bartosz Krawczyk;Michal Koziarski;Michal Wozniak

  • CCR: A combined cleaning and resampling algorithm for imbalanced data classification

    Michał Koziarski;Michał Wożniak

  • Dynamic ensemble selection for multi-class classification with one-class classifiers

    Bartosz Krawczyk;Mikel Galar;Michał Woźniak;Humberto Bustince

  • Nearest Neighbor Classification for High-Speed Big Data Streams Using Spark

    Sergio Ramirez-Gallego;Bartosz Krawczyk;Salvador Garcia;Michal Wozniak

  • Editorial: Editorial: New trends and applications on hybrid artificial intelligence systems

    Emilio Corchado;Manuel Graña;MichaŁ Woniak

  • Diversity measures for one-class classifier ensembles

    Bartosz Krawczyk;Michał Woniak

  • How to design the fair experimental classifier evaluation

    Katarzyna Stapor;Paweł Ksieniewicz;Salvador García;Michał Woźniak

  • Soft computing methods applied to combination of one-class classifiers

    Tomasz Wilk;Michal Wozniak

  • On the usefulness of one-class classifier ensembles for decomposition of multi-class problems

    Bartosz Krawczyk;Michał Woźniak;Francisco Herrera

  • Fault diagnosis of marine 4-stroke diesel engines using a one-vs-one extreme learning ensemble

    Jerzy Kowalski;Bartosz Krawczyk;Michał Woźniak

  • Optimization of Multicast Traffic in Elastic Optical Networks With Distance-Adaptive Transmission

    Krzysztof Walkowiak;Róza Goscien;Miroslaw Klinkowski;Michal Wozniak

  • A hybrid decision tree training method using data streams

    Michal Wozniak

  • Editorial: Recent trends in intelligent data analysis

    Emilio Corchado;Emilio Corchado;Michał Woniak;Ajith Abraham;André C. P. L. F. De Carvalho

  • Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI)

    Sabu M Thampi;Michal Wozniak;Oge Marques;Dilip Krishnaswamy

Frequent Co-Authors

Bartosz Krawczyk
Bartosz Krawczyk Rochester Institute of Technology
Manuel Graña
Manuel Graña University of the Basque Country
Emilio Corchado
Emilio Corchado University of Salamanca
Francisco Herrera
Francisco Herrera University of Granada
Gerald Schaefer
Gerald Schaefer Loughborough University
André C. P. L. F. de Carvalho
André C. P. L. F. de Carvalho Universidade de São Paulo
Ajith Abraham
Ajith Abraham Sai University
José Manuel Benítez
José Manuel Benítez University of Granada
Marios M. Polycarpou
Marios M. Polycarpou University of Cyprus
Miroslaw Klinkowski
Miroslaw Klinkowski Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a wide range of related degrees and career opportunities. Many students find it beneficial to complement their studies with programs such as an online bachelor's degree in physics to deepen their understanding of computational and scientific principles.

For those interested in data-driven industries, exploring the cheapest data science degree programs can lead to rewarding roles in analytics, AI, or machine learning. Engineering-minded students might also consider reviewing electrical engineering online tuition costs to find affordable paths toward careers in hardware, electronics, and emerging technologies.

Not all pathways require a lengthy degree. You can quickly boost your career prospects with specialized certificate programs that pay well, offering flexible options in IT, cybersecurity, and more. Whichever path you choose, there are varied and accessible ways to advance professionally and expand your expertise in the tech sector.

Best Scientists Citing Michal Wozniak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles