World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
70
Citations
23509
World Ranking
1651
National Ranking
134

Dave Raffaelli publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dave Raffaelli sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 168 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Dave Raffaelli D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dave Raffaelli sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dave Raffaelli is affiliated with the University of York in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the social sciences, with a focused subfield in sociology and political science.

The main topics addressed in their work include risk perception and management, reflecting an interest in how individuals and societies understand and respond to various risks.

Raffaelli's publication record features contributions to scholarly journals, with a noted paper titled Book review, published in 2024 in the journal Biological Conservation. This venue is the documented site of their academic output to date.

  • Book review (2024), Biological Conservation

Their frequent publication venue is Biological Conservation, a journal in which they have published at least one article.

There are no listed frequent co-authors associated with their work based on available data, indicating independent or solo authorship for the recorded publication.

Best Publications

  • Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges

    M. Loreau;S. Naeem;P. Inchausti;J. Bengtsson

  • Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services.

    Patricia Balvanera;Andrea B. Pfisterer;Nina Buchmann;Jing Shen He

  • Biodiversity and resilience of ecosystem functions

    Tom H. Oliver;Matthew S. Heard;Nick J.B. Isaac;David B. Roy

  • Predator–prey body size, interaction strength and the stability of a real food web

    Mark C. Emmerson;Mark C. Emmerson;Dave Raffaelli

  • Ecological impact of green macroalgal blooms

    D.G. Raffaelli;J.A. Raven;L.J. Poole

  • Aquatic Ecology: Scale, Pattern and Process.

    P. S. Giller;A. G. Hildrew;D. G. Raffaelli

  • Climate change, biotic interactions and ecosystem services.

    José M. Montoya;Dave Raffaelli

  • Consistent patterns and the idiosyncratic effects of biodiversity in marine ecosystems.

    Mark C. Emmerson;Martin Solan;Chas Emes;David M. Paterson

  • Dynamic changes in seagrass assemblages under eutrophication and implications for recovery

    P.G Cardoso;M.A Pardal;A.I Lillebø;S.M Ferreira

  • Pollution monitoring with meiofauna, using the ratio of nematodes to copepods☆

    Unknown

  • Predator traits determine food-web architecture across ecosystems

    Ulrich Brose;Phillippe Archambault;Andrew D. Barnes;Andrew D. Barnes;Louis-Felix Bersier

  • Uptake and depuration of pharmaceuticals in aquatic invertebrates

    Melanie Meredith-Williams;Laura J. Carter;Richard Fussell;David Raffaelli

  • Connecting Earth observation to high-throughput biodiversity data

    Alex Bush;Alex Bush;Alex Bush;Rahel Sollmann;Andreas Wilting;Kristine Bohmann;Kristine Bohmann

  • Do Parasites Reduce the Chances of Triangulation in a Real Food Web

    M. Huxham;S. Beaney;D. Raffaelli

  • THE EFFECTS OF CREVICE SIZE AND AVAILABILITY ON POPULATIONS OF LITTORINA RUDIS AND LITTORINA NERITOIDES

    D. G. Raffaelli;R. N. Hughes

  • Anthropogenic and natural disturbance effects on a macrobenthic estuarine community over a 10-year period.

    M. Dolbeth;P.G. Cardoso;S.M. Ferreira;T. Verdelhos

  • The impact of extreme flooding events and anthropogenic stressors on the macrobenthic communities’ dynamics

    P.G. Cardoso;D. Raffaelli;A.I. Lillebø;A.I. Lillebø;T. Verdelhos

  • How Extinction Patterns Affect Ecosystems

    David Raffaelli

  • Evaluating the outcomes of payments for ecosystem services programmes using a capital asset framework

    Adam P. Hejnowicz;David G. Raffaelli;Murray A. Rudd;Piran C.L. White

  • Parasites and food web patterns

    Mark Huxham;Dave Raffaelli;Alan Pike

  • Three allometric relations of population density to body mass : theoretical integration and empirical tests in 149 food webs

    Daniel C. Reuman;Christian Mulder;Dave Raffaelli;Joel E. Cohen

  • Effects of macroalgal mats on intertidal sandflats: an experimental study.

    Stefan G Bolam;Teresa F Fernandes;Paul Read;Dave Raffaelli

  • Consequences of species loss for ecosystem functioning: meta-analyses of data from biodiversity experiments

    Bernhard Schmid;Patricia Balvanera;Bradley J. Cardinale;Jasmin Godbold

  • Aquatic Ecology: Scale, Pattern and Process

    J.M. Elliott;P.S. Giller;A.G. Hildrew;D.G. Raffaelli

  • Book reviewBiomonitoring of coastal waters and estuaries: Edited by K.L.M. Kramer; CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, USA; 1994; 327 pp.; GBP 128.00; ISBN 0-8493-4895-1

    Dave Raffaelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Piran C. L. White
Piran C. L. White University of York
Miguel A. Pardal
Miguel A. Pardal University of Coimbra
Christian Mulder
Christian Mulder University of Catania
Mark Emmerson
Mark Emmerson Queen's University Belfast
Guy Woodward
Guy Woodward Imperial College London
Martin Solan
Martin Solan University of Southampton
José M. Montoya
José M. Montoya Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Marina Dolbeth
Marina Dolbeth University of Porto
William J. Sutherland
William J. Sutherland University of Cambridge
Michael Bonkowski
Michael Bonkowski University of Cologne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA can open diverse career paths, but many students also explore complementary online degrees to enhance their prospects. For educators interested in environmental issues, programs like the best online eds to edd programs offer advanced training in educational leadership and policy with flexible study options.

Professionals aiming to work in community support or social services related to environmental justice may consider pursuing dsw online programs. These programs prepare graduates for leadership roles focused on social welfare and advocacy, which are increasingly important in environmental sectors.

For those seeking affordable, versatile credentials, an online general studies bachelor degree cheap provides a broad educational foundation that can be tailored with environmental electives or related disciplines.

Lastly, students looking for a straightforward degree to complement their environmental science background might explore the easiest degree to get options online. These programs emphasize flexible pacing and manageable coursework, allowing learners to build credentials efficiently while pursuing careers in environmental fields.

Best Scientists Citing Dave Raffaelli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles