World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 42 7324 7039 2610 2429 68 8356

Danilo Dragoni publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Danilo Dragoni between 2004 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Danilo Dragoni published across 16 years, from 2004 to 2019, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2009. 1 of the 69 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2009. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 12 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication
2004 2019

69 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Danilo Dragoni: publications per year, 2004 to 2019
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 1
2006 1
2007 2
2008 1
2009 12
2010 9
2011 12
2012 10
2013 8
2014 6
2015 2
2016 0
2017 3
2018 0
2019 1
Total 69
Download as CSV

Danilo Dragoni publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danilo Dragoni sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–70 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 68 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133 68
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Danilo Dragoni D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danilo Dragoni sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305 42
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Danilo Dragoni is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States. Their academic profile does not currently list specific recent papers, co-authors, or venues for publication, which limits detailed insight into their individual research outputs and collaborations.

Despite the limited publication data, Danilo Dragoni's professional profile indicates an involvement in academic research within a university setting known for a broad range of disciplines. This affiliation suggests an engagement with higher education and potentially contributes to various scholarly activities including teaching, research, and mentoring.

No explicit details about main fields of study, subfields, or main topics covered are available, which restricts the ability to specify their research focus areas or thematic expertise.

There are no records of book publications or awards associated with Danilo Dragoni, which indicates that their academic contributions may primarily reside in other forms of scholarly communication or are not documented in the available sources.

The absence of data on citation counts or influential publications means that the impact of Danilo Dragoni's academic work cannot be assessed from the current information.

Best Publications

  • Increase in forest water-use efficiency as atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations rise

    Trevor F. Keenan;David Y. Hollinger;Gil Bohrer;Danilo Dragoni

  • Terrestrial biosphere models need better representation of vegetation phenology: results from the North American Carbon Program Site Synthesis

    Andrew D. Richardson;Ryan S. Anderson;M. Altaf Arain;Alan G. Barr

  • A model-data comparison of gross primary productivity: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis

    Kevin Schaefer;Christopher R. Schwalm;Chris Williams;M. Altaf Arain

  • Evidence of increased net ecosystem productivity associated with a longer vegetated season in a deciduous forest in south‐central Indiana, USA

    Danilo Dragoni;Hans Peter Schmid;Craig A. Wayson;Henry Potter

  • A model‐data intercomparison of CO2 exchange across North America: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis

    Christopher R. Schwalm;Christopher A. Williams;Kevin Schaefer;Ryan S. Anderson

  • The MODIS (Collection V005) BRDF/albedo product: Assessment of spatial representativeness over forested landscapes

    Miguel O. Román;Miguel O. Román;Crystal B. Schaaf;Curtis E. Woodcock;Alan H. Strahler

  • The role of isohydric and anisohydric species in determining ecosystem-scale response to severe drought.

    D. T. Roman;K. A. Novick;E. R. Brzostek;D. Dragoni

  • Mycorrhizal type determines the magnitude and direction of root-induced changes in decomposition in a temperate forest.

    Edward R. Brzostek;Danilo Dragoni;Zachary A. Brown;Richard P. Phillips

  • Chronic water stress reduces tree growth and the carbon sink of deciduous hardwood forests.

    Edward R. Brzostek;Danilo Dragoni;Hans Peter Schmid;Abdullah F. Rahman

  • Response of the Sundarbans coastline to sea level rise and decreased sediment flow: A remote sensing assessment

    Abdullah F. Rahman;Danilo Dragoni;Bassil El-Masri

  • Use of change-point detection for friction–velocity threshold evaluation in eddy-covariance studies

    A.G. Barr;A.D. Richardson;D.Y. Hollinger;D. Papale

  • Climate control of terrestrial carbon exchange across biomes and continents

    Chuixiang Yi;Daniel Ricciuto;Runze Li;John Wolbeck

  • Remote sensing data assimilation for a prognostic phenology model

    R. Stöckli;R. Stöckli;R. Stöckli;T. Rutishauser;D. Dragoni;J. O'Keefe

  • Global estimation of evapotranspiration using a leaf area index-based surface energy and water balance model

    H. Yan;S.Q. Wang;David P. Billesbach;Walter Oechel

  • Albedo estimates for land surface models and support for a new paradigm based on foliage nitrogen concentration

    David Y. Hollinger;S. V. Ollinger;A. D. Richardson;T. P. Meyers

  • Interannual variability of net ecosystem productivity in forests is explained by carbon flux phenology in autumn

    Chaoyang Wu;Jing M. Chen;T. Andrew Black;David T. Price

  • Evaluating spatial and temporal patterns of MODIS GPP over the conterminous U.S. against flux measurements and a process model

    Fangmin Zhang;Fangmin Zhang;Jing M. Chen;Jiquan Chen;Christopher M. Gough

  • Uncertainty of annual net ecosystem productivity estimated using eddy covariance flux measurements

    D. Dragoni;H. P. Schmid;C. S. B. Grimmond;C. S. B. Grimmond;H. W. Loescher

  • The role of sky conditions on gross primary production in a mixed deciduous forest

    A.J. Oliphant;D. Dragoni;B. Deng;C.S.B. Grimmond

  • Estimating nocturnal ecosystem respiration from the vertical turbulent flux and change in storage of CO2

    Eva van Gorsel;Nicolas Delpierre;Ray Leuning;Andy Black

  • Uncertainty of Annual net Ecosystem Productivity Estimated Using Eddy-Covariance Flux Measurements

    H. Schmid;D. Dragoni;S. C. Grimmond;H. W. Loescher

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans Peter Schmid
Hans Peter Schmid Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Ankur R. Desai
Ankur R. Desai University of Wisconsin–Madison
Andrew D. Richardson
Andrew D. Richardson Northern Arizona University
David Y. Hollinger
David Y. Hollinger US Forest Service
J. William Munger
J. William Munger Harvard University
Lianhong Gu
Lianhong Gu Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Russell K. Monson
Russell K. Monson University of Colorado Boulder
Gil Bohrer
Gil Bohrer The Ohio State University
Christopher M. Gough
Christopher M. Gough Virginia Commonwealth University
Beverly E. Law
Beverly E. Law Oregon State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Many programs offer flexibility and affordability, making higher education accessible to a wider audience. For example, the dsw program is designed for those who want to combine environmental advocacy with social work, addressing key community and policy challenges.

Those seeking a more interdisciplinary approach might consider the cheapest online general studies degree programs. These allow students to tailor their coursework toward environmental topics while maintaining a broader academic scope, providing versatility in career paths.

For individuals looking for a less intensive entry point, the easiest bachelor's degree to get can provide a foundation in environmental principles without overwhelming academic demands, ideal for balancing work and study.

Lastly, specialized fields such as geology and geoscience play a crucial role in environmental monitoring, resource management, and sustainability efforts. The online geoscience degree offers focused education that equips students for technical and research roles within environmental sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Danilo Dragoni

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles