World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
116
Citations
73017
World Ranking
4271
National Ranking
2334

D. Ross Camidge publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where D. Ross Camidge sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 668 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

D. Ross Camidge D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where D. Ross Camidge sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 116 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

D. Ross Camidge is affiliated with the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with a focus on subfields including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Cancer Research, Molecular Biology, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

Their work mainly concentrates on topics related to Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations, Lung Cancer Research Studies, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies, Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers, as well as Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes.

D. Ross Camidge has contributed extensively to several scientific journals. Frequent publication venues include Journal of Thoracic Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Annals of Oncology, Clinical Lung Cancer, and Lung Cancer.

Their collaborative network includes frequent co-authors such as Enriqueta Felip, Tejas Patil, James Chih-Hsin Yang, Sanjay Popat, and Alexander Drilon.

Among recent publications authored by Camidge are:

  • Brigatinib Versus Crizotinib in Advanced ALK Inhibitor-Naive ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Second Interim Analysis of the Phase III ALTA-1L Trial (2020), Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Brigatinib Versus Crizotinib in ALK Inhibitor-Naive Advanced ALK-Positive NSCLC: Final Results of Phase 3 ALTA-1L Trial (2021), Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Additional relevant papers from related researchers include:

  • Updated overall survival and final progression-free survival data for patients with treatment-naive advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in the ALEX study (2020), Annals of Oncology
  • Antitumor activity of crizotinib in lung cancers harboring a MET exon 14 alteration (2020), Nature Medicine
  • Activity and Safety of Mobocertinib (TAK-788) in Previously Treated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations from a Phase I/II Trial (2021), Cancer Discovery

Best Publications

  • Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibition in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

    Eunice L. Kwak;Yung-Jue Bang;D. Ross Camidge;Alice T. Shaw

  • Crizotinib versus Chemotherapy in Advanced ALK-Positive Lung Cancer

    Alice T. Shaw;Dong Wan Kim;Kazuhiko Nakagawa;Takashi Seto

  • Alectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK-Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

    Solange Peters;D. Ross Camidge;Alice T. Shaw;Shirish Gadgeel

  • Crizotinib in ROS1-Rearranged Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

    Alice T. Shaw;Sai Hong I. Ou;Yung Jue Bang;D. Ross Camidge

  • Ceritinib in ALK-Rearranged Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

    Alice T. Shaw;Dong Wan Kim;Ranee Mehra;Daniel S W Tan

  • Using Multiplexed Assays of Oncogenic Drivers in Lung Cancers to Select Targeted Drugs

    Mark G. Kris;Bruce E. Johnson;Lynne D. Berry;David J. Kwiatkowski

  • Activity and safety of crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: updated results from a phase 1 study.

    D. Ross Camidge;Yung Jue Bang;Eunice L. Kwak;A. John Iafrate

  • Mechanisms of Resistance to Crizotinib in Patients with ALK Gene Rearranged Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

    Robert C. Doebele;Amanda B. Pilling;Dara L. Aisner;Tatiana G. Kutateladze

  • Local Consolidative Therapy Vs. Maintenance Therapy or Observation for Patients With Oligometastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Long-Term Results of a Multi-Institutional, Phase II, Randomized Study.

    Daniel R. Gomez;Chad Tang;Jianjun Zhang;George R. Blumenschein

  • Local consolidative therapy versus maintenance therapy or observation for patients with oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer without progression after first-line systemic therapy: a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 study

    Daniel R Gomez;George R Blumenschein;J Jack Lee;Mike Hernandez

  • Effect of crizotinib on overall survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring ALK gene rearrangement: a retrospective analysis.

    Alice T. Shaw;Beow Y. Yeap;Benjamin J. Solomon;Gregory J. Riely

  • Immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with advanced lung cancer and oncogenic driver alterations: results from the IMMUNOTARGET registry

    J. Mazieres;A. Drilon;A. Lusque;L. Mhanna

  • Acquired resistance to TKIs in solid tumours: learning from lung cancer

    D. Ross Camidge;William Pao;Lecia V. Sequist

  • Response assessment criteria for brain metastases: proposal from the RANO group

    Nancy U Lin;Eudocia Q Lee;Hidefumi Aoyama;Igor J Barani

  • Brigatinib versus Crizotinib in ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

    D. Ross Camidge;Hye Ryun Kim;Myung Ju Ahn;James Chih Hsin Yang

  • Rociletinib in EGFR-Mutated Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

    Lecia V. Sequist;Jean Charles Soria;Jonathan W. Goldman;Heather A. Wakelee

  • Lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a global phase 2 study

    Benjamin J. Solomon;Benjamin Besse;Benjamin Besse;Todd M. Bauer;Enriqueta Felip

  • Local Ablative Therapy of Oligoprogressive Disease Prolongs Disease Control by Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Oncogene-Addicted Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

    Andrew J. Weickhardt;Benjamin Scheier;Joseph Malachy Burke;Gregory Gan

  • Alectinib in ALK-positive, crizotinib-resistant, non-small-cell lung cancer: a single-group, multicentre, phase 2 trial

    Alice T Shaw;Leena Gandhi;Shirish Gadgeel;Gregory J Riely

  • Phase I Pharmacologic and Biologic Study of Ramucirumab (IMC-1121B), a Fully Human Immunoglobulin G1 Monoclonal Antibody Targeting the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2

    Jennifer L. Spratlin;Roger B. Cohen;Matthew Eadens;Lia Gore

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert C. Doebele
Robert C. Doebele University of Colorado Denver
Alice T. Shaw
Alice T. Shaw Harvard University
Benjamin Solomon
Benjamin Solomon Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou
Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou University of California, Irvine
Shirish M. Gadgeel
Shirish M. Gadgeel University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Dong-Wan Kim
Dong-Wan Kim Seoul National University Hospital
Gregory J. Riely
Gregory J. Riely Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Lecia V. Sequist
Lecia V. Sequist Harvard University
Paul A. Bunn
Paul A. Bunn University of Colorado Boulder
Scott N. Gettinger
Scott N. Gettinger Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in medical careers, there are a variety of flexible online options to advance your education and broaden your opportunities. Many nurses start their journey through cost-effective programs; consider the most affordable accredited online rn to bsn programs to complete your bachelor’s degree and open doors to leadership roles.

If you hold a non-nursing bachelor’s degree and want to shift careers, there are online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses that allow a fast-track path toward advanced nursing credentials. Entry requirements and program lengths vary, so researching your options is crucial.

For students looking for a smoother admission process, explore whats the easiest nursing program to get into? to find schools offering supportive entry requirements and flexible learning.

Not all healthcare roles require patient care—those interested in administration might opt for careers in medical billing and coding. Research medical billing and coding schools with financial aid to find accredited programs that can be completed from home with financial support options.

Best Scientists Citing D. Ross Camidge

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles