World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
38776
World Ranking
16387
National Ranking
8245

Charles L. Daley publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles L. Daley sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 310 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Charles L. Daley D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles L. Daley sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles L. Daley is affiliated with National Jewish Health in the United States and has made significant contributions to the field of medicine with a focus on infectious diseases, epidemiology, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine. Their research portfolio includes a substantial body of work related to Mycobacterium research and diagnosis as well as tuberculosis research and epidemiology.

The scientist has published extensively, with 195 works classified under the broad field of medicine. Within this, their subfields of study include epidemiology with 76 publications, infectious diseases with 55, pulmonary and respiratory medicine with 39, small animals with 30, and surgery with 9.

Charles L. Daley's research topics center on:

  • Mycobacterium research and diagnosis
  • Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Infectious Diseases and Mycology
  • Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Tracheal and airway disorders
  • Quinazolinone synthesis and applications
  • Pediatric health and respiratory diseases

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Kevin Winthrop
  • David E. Griffith
  • Jerry A. Nick
  • Vinicius Calado Nogueira de Moura
  • Kenneth N. Olivier

Daley has published regularly in high-impact medical journals. The venues with the most publications include:

  • CHEST Journal
  • Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • European Respiratory Journal

Notable recent papers by Charles L. Daley include:

  • Treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: an official ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA clinical practice guideline, 2020, European Respiratory Journal
  • Treatment of Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Disease: An Official ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA Clinical Practice Guideline, 2020, Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • Treatment of Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Disease: An Official ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA Clinical Practice Guideline, 2020, Clinical Infectious Diseases

These publications primarily deal with guidelines and treatment approaches for nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease. Their work often intersects with clinical infectious diseases and respiratory medicine, reflecting a strong clinical and translational research focus.

Best Publications

  • An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases.

    David E. Griffith;Timothy Aksamit;Barbara A. Brown-Elliott;Antonino Catanzaro

  • American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America: treatment of tuberculosis.

    Henry M Blumberg;William J Burman;Richard E Chaisson;Charles L Daley

  • Treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: an official ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA clinical practice guideline

    Charles L. Daley;Jonathan M. Iaccarino;Christoph Lange;Emmanuelle Cambau

  • The Epidemiology of Tuberculosis in San Francisco -- A Population-Based Study Using Conventional and Molecular Methods

    Peter M. Small;Philip C. Hopewell;Samir P. Singh;Antonio Paz

  • Official American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guidelines: Treatment of Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis.

    Payam Nahid;Susan E. Dorman;Narges Alipanah;Pennan M. Barry

  • An Outbreak of Tuberculosis With Accelerated Progression Among Persons Infected With the Human Immunodeficiency Virus. An Analysis Using Restriction-Fragment-Length Polymorphisms

    Charles L. Daley;Peter M. Small;Gisela F. Schecter;Gary K. Schoolnik

  • Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from patients smear-negative for acid-fast bacilli

    MA Behr;SA Warren;H Salamon;PC Hopewell

  • WHO guidelines for the programmatic management of drug-resistant tuberculosis: 2011 update

    D. Falzon;E. Jaramillo;H. J. Schünemann;M. Arentz

  • A Controlled Clinical Trial of E5 Murine Monoclonal IgM Antibody to Endotoxin in the Treatment of Gram-Negative Sepsis

    R L Greenman;R M Schein;M A Martin;R P Wenzel

  • The geographic diversity of nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from pulmonary samples: an NTM-NET collaborative study

    Wouter Hoefsloot;Jakko Van Ingen;Claire Andrejak;Kristian Ängeby

  • Official American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Clinical Practice Guidelines: Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in Adults and Children

    David M. Lewinsohn;Michael K. Leonard;Philip A. LoBue;David L. Cohn

  • Treatment of Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Disease: An Official ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA Clinical Practice Guideline: Executive Summary

    Charles L Daley;Jonathan M Iaccarino;Christoph Lange;Emmanuelle Cambau

  • Clinical significance of differentiation of Mycobacterium massiliense from Mycobacterium abscessus.

    Won Jung Koh;Kyeongman Jeon;Nam Yong Lee;Bum Joon Kim

  • US Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and European Cystic Fibrosis Society consensus recommendations for the management of non-tuberculous mycobacteria in individuals with cystic fibrosis

    R. Andres Floto;R. Andres Floto;Kenneth N. Olivier;Lisa Saiman;Charles L. Daley

  • Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in health care workers in rural India: comparison of a whole-blood interferon gamma assay with tuberculin skin testing.

    Madhukar Pai;Kaustubh Gokhale;Rajnish Joshi;Sandeep Dogra

  • Epidemiology of human pulmonary infection with nontuberculous mycobacteria

    Theodore K Marras;Charles L Daley

  • Comparison of a Whole-Blood Interferon γ Assay With Tuberculin Skin Testing for Detecting Latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection

    Gerald H. Mazurek;Philip A. LoBue;Philip A. LoBue;Charles L. Daley;John Bernardo

  • Clinical and Microbiologic Outcomes in Patients Receiving Treatment for Mycobacterium abscessus Pulmonary Disease

    Julie Jarand;Adrah Levin;Lening Zhang;Gwen Huitt

  • Pneumococcal disease during HIV infection. Epidemiologic, clinical, and immunologic perspectives.

    Edward N. Janoff;Robert F. Breiman;Charles L. Daley;Philip C. Hopewell

  • Adult Patients With Bronchiectasis: A First Look at the US Bronchiectasis Research Registry.

    Timothy R. Aksamit;Anne E. O’Donnell;Alan Barker;Kenneth N. Olivier

Frequent Co-Authors

Won-Jung Koh
Won-Jung Koh Samsung Medical Center
Kevin L. Winthrop
Kevin L. Winthrop Oregon Health & Science University
Kenneth N. Olivier
Kenneth N. Olivier National Institutes of Health
Philip C. Hopewell
Philip C. Hopewell University of California, San Francisco
Nam Yong Lee
Nam Yong Lee Samsung Medical Center
Jerry A. Nick
Jerry A. Nick National Jewish Health
O Jung Kwon
O Jung Kwon Sungkyunkwan University
Michael R. Knowles
Michael R. Knowles University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Peter M. Small
Peter M. Small Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Michael J. Strong
Michael J. Strong University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medicine in the USA offers a wide landscape of related degrees and alternative career pathways, particularly through flexible and accessible online programs. For those interested in fast-tracking their nursing career, direct msn programs online provide an accelerated route for non-nurses to earn a Master’s in Nursing without traditional prerequisites.

Alternatively, online bsn programs for non nurses offer a bachelor’s degree option with less rigorous admission requirements—helpful for career changers or those early in their studies.

Not all healthcare careers require years of medical school. Administrative roles such as medical billing and coding are in high demand. Many reputable medical billing and coding online schools support students with flexible schedules and financial aid options, making this pathway accessible to more learners.

Finally, some nursing schools ease the application process by eliminating standardized entrance tests. nursing schools that don't require teas or hesi exams enable students to focus on other aspects of their application, opening doors for aspiring nurses from varying backgrounds.

Best Scientists Citing Charles L. Daley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles