World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
103
Citations
44371
World Ranking
7292
National Ranking
3818

Philip C. Hopewell publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip C. Hopewell sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 322 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Philip C. Hopewell D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip C. Hopewell sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip C. Hopewell is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research work primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on Infectious Diseases.

Their subfields of study include:

  • Infectious Diseases
  • Surgery
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
  • Modeling and Simulation

The primary topics covered by their research encompass:

  • Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Global Health and Surgery
  • Global Maternal and Child Health
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Infection Control and Ventilation
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections

Philip C. Hopewell has contributed to several publications in notable scientific venues, including:

  • The Lancet
  • Emerging Infectious Diseases
  • BMC Infectious Diseases
  • The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
  • IJTLD OPEN

Recent papers authored or co-authored by them include:

  • Parallels and Mutual Lessons in Tuberculosis and COVID-19 Transmission, Prevention, and Control, 2020, Emerging Infectious Diseases
  • Scientific advances and the end of tuberculosis: a report from the Lancet Commission on Tuberculosis, 2023, The Lancet
  • The yield of tuberculosis contact investigation in low- and middle-income settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2021, BMC Infectious Diseases
  • A decrease in tuberculosis evaluations and diagnoses during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020, The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
  • Rethinking latent TB? Think again, 2024, IJTLD OPEN

Their research collaborations include frequent co-authors such as:

  • Michael Reid
  • Richard E. Chaisson
  • Yvan Jean Patrick Agbassi
  • Nimalan Arinaminpathy
  • Alyssa Bercasio

Best Publications

  • American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America: treatment of tuberculosis.

    Henry M Blumberg;William J Burman;Richard E Chaisson;Charles L Daley

  • Treatment of tuberculosis and tuberculosis infection in adults and children. American Thoracic Society and The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    J B Bass;L S Farer;P C Hopewell;R O'Brien

  • The Epidemiology of Tuberculosis in San Francisco -- A Population-Based Study Using Conventional and Molecular Methods

    Peter M. Small;Philip C. Hopewell;Samir P. Singh;Antonio Paz

  • Official American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guidelines: Treatment of Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis.

    Payam Nahid;Susan E. Dorman;Narges Alipanah;Pennan M. Barry

  • An Outbreak of Tuberculosis With Accelerated Progression Among Persons Infected With the Human Immunodeficiency Virus. An Analysis Using Restriction-Fragment-Length Polymorphisms

    Charles L. Daley;Peter M. Small;Gisela F. Schecter;Gary K. Schoolnik

  • Targeted tuberculin testing and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection: This Official Statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999. T

    Pi Fujiwara;RF Jacobs;Iseman;PC Hopewell

  • Variable host-pathogen compatibility in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

    Sebastien Gagneux;Kathryn DeRiemer;Tran Van;Midori Kato-Maeda

  • Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from patients smear-negative for acid-fast bacilli

    MA Behr;SA Warren;H Salamon;PC Hopewell

  • Fluorescence versus conventional sputum smear microscopy for tuberculosis: a systematic review.

    Karen R Steingart;Megan Henry;Vivienne Ng;Philip C Hopewell

  • Pulmonary complications of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Report of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop.

    John F. Murray;Charles P. Felton;Stuart M. Garay;Michael S. Gottlieb

  • Bacterial pneumonia in persons infected with the human immunodeficiency virus

    Robert E. Hirschtick;Jeffrey Glassroth;Matthew C. Jordan;Timothy C. Wilcosky

  • Exogenous reinfection with multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in patients with advanced HIV infection.

    Peter M. Small;Robert W. Shafer;Philip C. Hopewell;Samir P. Singh

  • Sputum processing methods to improve the sensitivity of smear microscopy for tuberculosis: a systematic review

    Karen R Steingart;Vivienne Ng;Megan Henry;Philip C Hopewell

  • Clinical practice. Latent tuberculosis infection.

    Robert M Jasmer;Payam Nahid;Philip C Hopewell

  • The intrinsic transmission dynamics of tuberculosis epidemics.

    Sally M. Blower;Angela R. Mclean;Travis C. Porco;Peter M. Small

  • Treatment of tuberculosis in patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection.

    Peter M. Small;Gisela F. Schecter;Philip C. Goodman;Merle A. Sande

  • Tuberculosis in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Clinical features, response to therapy, and survival.

    Richard E. Chaisson;Gisela F. Schecter;Charles P. Theuer;George W. Rutherford

  • Tuberculosis and latent tuberculosis infection in close contacts of people with pulmonary tuberculosis in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Janina Morrison;Madhukar Pai;Philip C Hopewell

  • Bronchoalveolar Lavage and Transbronchial Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Infections in the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

    C Broaddus;M D Dake;M S Stulbarg;W Blumenfeld

  • International standards for tuberculosis care.

    Philip C Hopewell;Madhukar Pai;Dermot Maher;Mukund Uplekar

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles L. Daley
Charles L. Daley National Jewish Health
Madhukar Pai
Madhukar Pai McGill University
Peter M. Small
Peter M. Small Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Laurence Huang
Laurence Huang University of California, San Francisco
Arthur L. Reingold
Arthur L. Reingold University of California, Berkeley
Richard E. Chaisson
Richard E. Chaisson Johns Hopkins University
Eric Vittinghoff
Eric Vittinghoff University of California, San Francisco
Eliseo J. Pérez-Stable
Eliseo J. Pérez-Stable National Institutes of Health
John Mills
John Mills Monash University
Sebastien Gagneux
Sebastien Gagneux University of Basel

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a medical career doesn’t always mean attending a traditional, on-campus program. Many future healthcare professionals now choose online pathways to save time and money while gaining respected credentials.

Registered nurses aiming to expand their roles can enroll in rn to bsn online programs, a flexible way to earn a bachelor’s degree. For those with a bachelor’s in another field who wish to transition into nursing, direct msn programs online offer a fast-track to advanced nursing roles.

Cost is often a key concern. Prospective students may want to research the cheapest dnp programs to minimize educational debt while maximizing career options.

Entry requirements can vary. If you’re looking for a less competitive option, consider whats the easiest nursing program to get into? to discover accessible schools and programs.

Online healthcare degrees open doors to numerous career pathways, helping you balance studies with personal and professional commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Philip C. Hopewell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles