World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
46
Citations
14348
World Ranking
4141
National Ranking
1785

Brian Sauer publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian Sauer sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 82 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Brian Sauer D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian Sauer sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brian Sauer is affiliated with the Stowers Institute for Medical Research in the United States. Their work is situated within an established research institution known for contributions to biomedical science.

While specific research topics, main fields of study, and subfields are not detailed, the affiliation suggests engagement in biomedical or related scientific research. There are no listed publications or co-authors to provide further detail on the precise areas of investigation or collaborative networks.

No information is available regarding recent papers, book publications, or frequent publication venues, which limits the ability to outline the scientist's publication history or preferred journals and conferences.

There are no recorded awards or honors linked to Brian Sauer, and they are currently living.

Best Publications

  • Site-specific DNA recombination in mammalian cells by the Cre recombinase of bacteriophage P1.

    Brian Sauer;Nancy Henderson

  • Intestinal polyposis in mice with a dominant stable mutation of the β-catenin gene

    Naomoto Harada;Yoshitaka Tamai;Tomo O. Ishikawa;Brian Sauer;Brian Sauer

  • Efficient in vivo manipulation of mouse genomic sequences at the zygote stage

    Merja Lakso;Jose G. Pichel;James R. Gorman;Brian Sauer

  • Targeted oncogene activation by site-specific recombination in transgenic mice

    M Lakso;B Sauer;B Mosinger;E J Lee

  • Functional expression of the cre-lox site-specific recombination system in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    B Sauer

  • Manipulation of transgenes by site-specific recombination: use of Cre recombinase.

    Brian Sauer

  • Cre-stimulated recombination at loxP-containing DNA sequences placed into the mammalian genome

    Brian Sauer;Nancy Henderson

  • RECOMBINACION ESPECIFICA DE SITIO DE DNA EN LEVADURAS.

    Sauer Brian Lee

  • Targeted insertion of exogenous DNA into the eukaryotic genome by the Cre recombinase.

    B. Sauer;N. Henderson

  • Genomic targeting with a positive-selection lox integration vector allows highly reproducible gene expression in mammalian cells.

    Shinichi Fukushige;Brian Sauer

  • Site-directed recombination in the genome of transgenic tobacco.

    Joan Odell;Perry Caimi;Brian Sauer;Sandra Russell

  • Disruption of the c/ebp alpha gene in adult mouse liver.

    Ying-Hue Lee;Brian Sauer;Peter F. Johnson;Frank J. Gonzalez

  • Genomic targeting with purified Cre recombinase

    Wendy Baubonis;Brian Sauer

  • A positive selection vector for cloning high molecular weight DNA by the bacteriophage P1 system: improved cloning efficacy.

    James C. Pierce;Brian Sauer;Nat Sternberg

  • Conditional gene knockout using Cre recombinase.

    Yunzheng Le;Brian Sauer

  • Site-specific recombination of dna in plant cells

    Joan Tellefsen Odell;Sandra Hoff Russell;Brian Lee Sauer;Francis Chuoh Hsu

  • DNA recombination with a heterospecific Cre homolog identified from comparison of the pac-c1 regions of P1-related phages

    Brian Sauer;Jeffrey McDermott

  • Segmental genomic replacement by Cre-mediated recombination: genotoxic stress activation of the p53 promoter in single-copy transformants

    Bruce Bethke;Brian Sauer

  • Segmental genomic replacement in embryonic stem cells by double lox targeting

    Serguei Soukharev;Jeffery L. Miller;Brian Sauer

  • Brief expression of a GFPcre fusion gene in embryonic stem cells allows rapid retrieval of site-specific genomic deletions

    Sara Gagneten;Yunzheng Le;Jeffrey Miller;Brian Sauer

Frequent Co-Authors

Lynn W. Enquist
Lynn W. Enquist Princeton University
Nat Sternberg
Nat Sternberg National Institutes of Health
Edward N. Pugh
Edward N. Pugh University of California, Davis
Heiner Westphal
Heiner Westphal National Institutes of Health
Su-Chun Zhang
Su-Chun Zhang University of Wisconsin–Madison
Ashok B. Kulkarni
Ashok B. Kulkarni National Institutes of Health
David R. Hyde
David R. Hyde University of Notre Dame
John A. Hanover
John A. Hanover National Institutes of Health
Jeffrey S. Miller
Jeffrey S. Miller University of Minnesota
Peter McPhie
Peter McPhie National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring genetics opens doors to numerous career options in health, research, and technology. For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, a career in medical billing and coding offers a stable pathway with strong demand. This field is ideal for individuals who want to work in healthcare without pursuing advanced science degrees.

Many students now seek flexibility and faster completion times. You may want to consider colleges with accelerated programs if you wish to graduate sooner and jumpstart your genetics-related career. Alternatively, those balancing work and study can benefit from self paced online college programs, which provide greater autonomy and adaptable schedules.

It’s also wise to consider institutions that make the application process easier. Choosing from the list of accredited online universities with no application fee can reduce upfront costs and remove barriers to entry for many prospective students.

Best Scientists Citing Brian Sauer