World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
54
Citations
10161
World Ranking
15657
National Ranking
6528

David R. Hyde publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David R. Hyde sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 165 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

David R. Hyde D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David R. Hyde sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

David R. Hyde is affiliated with the University of Notre Dame in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine, with a focus on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, and Neurology as key subfields. The scientist's work addresses main topics including Retinal Development and Disorders, Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications, Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms, Traumatic Brain Injury Research, and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms.

Recent publications by David R. Hyde include the following:

  • Gene regulatory networks controlling vertebrate retinal regeneration, 2020, Science
  • Reprogramming Müller Glia to Regenerate Retinal Neurons, 2020, Annual Review of Vision Science
  • Inflammation and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (Mmp-9) regulate photoreceptor regeneration in adult zebrafish, 2020, Glia
  • The Regenerating Adult Zebrafish Retina Recapitulates Developmental Fate Specification Programs, 2021, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
  • Notch3 and DeltaB maintain Müller glia quiescence and act as negative regulators of regeneration in the light-damaged zebrafish retina, 2020, Glia

The scientist often collaborates with other researchers, frequently co-authoring papers with Patrick Boyd, Leah J. Campbell, Seth Blackshaw, James Hentig, and Kaylee Cloghessy.

David R. Hyde publishes regularly in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, Journal of Visualized Experiments, UNC Libraries, and Glia. The body of work reflects a consistent interest in zebrafish as a model for retinal and neurological studies.

Best Publications

  • The zebrafish as a model for complex tissue regeneration

    Matthew Gemberling;Travis J. Bailey;David R. Hyde;Kenneth D. Poss

  • Light-induced rod and cone cell death and regeneration in the adult albino zebrafish (Danio rerio) retina.

    Thomas S. Vihtelic;David R. Hyde

  • Gene regulatory networks controlling vertebrate retinal regeneration

    Thanh Hoang;Jie Wang;Patrick Boyd;Fang Wang

  • The UV visual world of fishes: a review

    G. S. Losey;T. W. Cronin;T. H. Goldsmith;D. Hyde

  • Cloning and characterization of six zebrafish photoreceptor opsin cDNAs and immunolocalization of their corresponding proteins.

    Thomas S. Vihtelic;Christopher J. Doro;David R. Hyde

  • Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha Is Produced by Dying Retinal Neurons and Is Required for Müller Glia Proliferation during Zebrafish Retinal Regeneration

    Craig M. Nelson;Kristin M. Ackerman;Patrick O'Hayer;Travis J. Bailey

  • Localization of Drosophila retinal degeneration B, a membrane-associated phosphatidylinositol transfer protein

    Thomas S. Vihtelic;Mark Goebl;Scott Milligan;Joseph E. O'Tousa

  • Fgf-dependent depletion of microRNA-133 promotes appendage regeneration in zebrafish

    Viravuth P. Yin;J. Michael Thomson;Ryan Thummel;David R. Hyde

  • The Phosphatidylinositol Transfer Protein Domain of Drosophila Retinal Degeneration B Protein Is Essential for Photoreceptor Cell Survival and Recovery from Light Stimulation

    Scott C. Milligan;James G. Alb;Raya B. Elagina;Vytas A. Bankaitis

  • Ganglion cell regeneration following whole-retina destruction in zebrafish.

    Tshering Sherpa;Shane M. Fimbel;Dianne E. Mallory;Hans Maaswinkel

  • dgq: A drosophila gene encoding a visual system-specific Gα molecule

    Young Jae Lee;Matthew B. Dobbs;Mary L. Verardi;David R. Hyde

  • Genetic determinants of hyaloid and retinal vasculature in zebrafish

    Yolanda Alvarez;Maria L Cederlund;David C Cottell;Brent R Bill

  • Repressing notch signaling and expressing TNFα are sufficient to mimic retinal regeneration by inducing Müller glial proliferation to generate committed progenitor cells.

    Clay Conner;Kristin M. Ackerman;Manuela Lahne;Joshua S. Hobgood

  • CNTF induces photoreceptor neuroprotection and Müller glial cell proliferation through two different signaling pathways in the adult zebrafish retina.

    Sean C. Kassen;Ryan Thummel;Laura A. Campochiaro;Molly J. Harding

  • A novel model of retinal ablation demonstrates that the extent of rod cell death regulates the origin of the regenerated zebrafish rod photoreceptors

    Jacob E. Montgomery;Michael J. Parsons;David R. Hyde

  • Twenty Drosophila visual system cDNA clones: one is a homolog of human arrestin.

    David R. Hyde;Kirk L. Mecklenburg;John A. Pollock;Thomas S. Vihtelic

  • Isolation and characterization of the Drosophila retinal degeneration B (rdgB) gene.

    T S Vihtelic;D R Hyde;J E O'Tousa

  • Stat3 defines three populations of Müller glia and is required for initiating maximal müller glia proliferation in the regenerating zebrafish retina.

    Craig M. Nelson;Ryne A. Gorsuch;Travis J. Bailey;Kristin M. Ackerman

  • The drosophila dgq gene encodes a Gα protein that mediates phototransduction

    Young-Jae Lee;Seema Shah;Emiko Suzuki;Troy Zars

  • Regulation of Müller glial dependent neuronal regeneration in the damaged adult zebrafish retina.

    Ryne A. Gorsuch;David R. Hyde

Frequent Co-Authors

Andy J. Fischer
Andy J. Fischer The Ohio State University
Jiang Qian
Jiang Qian Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Kenneth D. Poss
Kenneth D. Poss Duke University
Seth Blackshaw
Seth Blackshaw Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Vytas A. Bankaitis
Vytas A. Bankaitis Texas A&M University
William R. Jeffery
William R. Jeffery University of Maryland, College Park
Graeme Wistow
Graeme Wistow National Institutes of Health
Baruch Minke
Baruch Minke Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Zvi Selinger
Zvi Selinger Hebrew University of Jerusalem
James G. Patton
James G. Patton Vanderbilt University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to varied online degrees and career pathways. A popular option for science graduates is entering the field of health data management. Many wonder how long does it take to become a medical coder. The answer depends on your education level and chosen certification, but it’s possible to qualify within a year.

If you are considering a non-laboratory role, explore if is medical coding a good job for your skills and interests. Medical billing and coding can offer job security and remote work opportunities, but it also comes with unique challenges such as accuracy demands and deadlines.

For flexible study options, you’ll find a range of health information management schools online designed to fit around busy schedules and various budgets.

If nutrition interests you, science backgrounds pair well with online degrees in nutrition, leading to careers in wellness, dietetics, or research.

Best Scientists Citing David R. Hyde

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles