World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
21045
World Ranking
5319
National Ranking
2910

Bernadette Park publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernadette Park sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 90 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Bernadette Park D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernadette Park sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bernadette Park is affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with subfields including Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, such as:

  • Career Development and Diversity
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Obesity and Health Practices
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Bernadette Park include:

  • "Developing the Sense of Belonging Scale and Understanding Its Relationship to Loneliness, Need to Belong, and General Well-Being Outcomes," 2023, Journal of Personality Assessment
  • "Trait Stereotypes of Scientists as Analytical and Cold Align With Perceptions of Men More Than Women on Both Implicit and Explicit Measures," 2022, Social Cognition
  • "Who chooses a pSTEM academic major? Using social psychology to predict selection and persistence over the freshman year," 2021, Journal of Applied Social Psychology
  • "Stereotypes About Who is Affected by Eating Disorders Disadvantage Risk Perception for Black Girls and Women," 2024, Sex Roles
  • "The use of lullaby to support social and emotional wellness among parents during the COVID-19 pandemic," 2023, Psychology of Music

Bernadette Park frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Sex Roles
  • Journal of Personality Assessment
  • Social Cognition
  • Journal of Applied Social Psychology
  • Psychology of Music

Collaboration is evident in Bernadette Park's work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Sona Dimidjian
  • Anne E. Fritzson
  • Christopher Mellinger
  • Erin McPherson
  • Sarah Banchefsky

Best Publications

  • The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line

    Reid Hastie;Bernadette Park

  • The Police Officer's Dilemma: Using Ethnicity to Disambiguate Potentially Threatening Individuals

    Joshua Correll;Bernadette Park;Charles M. Judd;Bernd Wittenbrink

  • Evidence for Racial Prejudice at the Implicit Level and Its Relationship With Questionnaire Measures

    Bernd Wittenbrink;Charles M. Judd;Bernadette Park

  • Perception of Out-Group Homogeneity and Levels of Social Categorization: Memory for the Subordinate Attributes of In-Group and Out-Group Members

    Bernadette Park;Myron Rothbart

  • Across the thin blue line: police officers and racial bias in the decision to shoot.

    Joshua Correll;Bernadette Park;Charles M. Judd;Bernd Wittenbrink

  • Definition and assessment of accuracy in social stereotypes.

    Charles M. Judd;Bernadette Park

  • Spontaneous prejudice in context: variability in automatically activated attitudes.

    Bernd Wittenbrink;Charles M. Judd;Bernadette Park

  • Framing interethnic ideology: Effects of multicultural and color-blind perspectives on judgments of groups and individuals.

    Christopher Wolsko;Bernadette Park;Charles M. Judd;Bernd Wittenbrink

  • Out-group homogeneity: Judgments of variability at the individual and group levels.

    Charles M. Judd;Bernadette Park

  • When power does not corrupt: superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers.

    Jennifer R. Overbeck;Bernadette Park

  • Measures and models of perceived group variability.

    Bernadette Park;Charles M. Judd

  • On the confirmability and disconfirmability of trait concepts.

    Myron Rothbart;Bernadette Park

  • A Model of the Ingroup as a Social Resource

    Joshua Correll;Bernadette Park

  • A Method for Studying the Development of Impressions of Real People

    Bernadette Park

  • Stereotypes and ethnocentrism: diverging interethnic perceptions of African American and white American youth.

    Charles M. Judd;Bernadette Park;Carey S. Ryan;Markus Brauer

  • Rethinking the Link Between Categorization and Prejudice Within the Social Cognition Perspective

    Bernadette Park;Charles M. Judd

  • Powerful perceivers, powerless objects: Flexibility of powerholders’ social attention☆

    Jennifer R. Overbeck;Bernadette Park

  • Perception of variability in category development: Instance- versus abstraction-based stereotypes.

    Bernadette Park;Reid Hastie

  • Considering the Tower of Babel: Correlates of Assimilation and Multiculturalism among Ethnic Minority and Majority Groups in the United States

    Christopher Wolsko;Bernadette Park;Charles M. Judd

  • Accuracy in the judgment of in-group and out-group variability.

    Charles M. Judd;Carey S. Ryan;Bernadette Park

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles M. Judd
Charles M. Judd University of Colorado Boulder
Joshua Correll
Joshua Correll University of Colorado Boulder
Reid Hastie
Reid Hastie University of Chicago
Tiffany A. Ito
Tiffany A. Ito University of Colorado Boulder
Vincent Yzerbyt
Vincent Yzerbyt Université Catholique de Louvain
Robyn M. Dawes
Robyn M. Dawes Carnegie Mellon University
Sona Dimidjian
Sona Dimidjian University of Colorado Boulder
Jon A. Krosnick
Jon A. Krosnick Stanford University
Leaf Van Boven
Leaf Van Boven University of Colorado Boulder
Yphtach Lelkes
Yphtach Lelkes University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in psychology opens up a wide range of career options, from clinical roles to research, counseling, and even positions in education or business. With the growing demand for mental health professionals, finding the right online program can help you start or advance your career.

Cost is a key factor when choosing a degree. Many universities now offer flexible online programs, with tuition rates that vary by location and institution. For budget-conscious students, there are affordable psychology degrees in Louisville and other cities that provide quality education without a hefty price tag. If you’re looking for alternatives, explore affordable psychology programs in Minneapolis or check out the cheapest psychology degrees in Missouri.

North Carolina also offers several affordable psychology programs in North Carolina, helping students find a program that fits both their financial needs and career goals. Researching these options can lead you toward an online psychology degree that suits your budget and opens new professional pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Bernadette Park

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles