World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Australia
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
48
Citations
10053
World Ranking
5477
National Ranking
196

Arnold G. Dekker publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arnold G. Dekker sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 139 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Arnold G. Dekker D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arnold G. Dekker sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Arnold G. Dekker is affiliated with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Australia. Their research spans multiple fields primarily focused on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences.

The scientist has contributed to key topics including:

  • Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
  • Marine and coastal plant biology
  • Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
  • Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management

Main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Subfields of study covered by their research are:

  • Oceanography
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Ecology
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Water Science and Technology

Arnold G. Dekker's recent publications include the following papers:

  • "GLORIA - A globally representative hyperspectral in situ dataset for optical sensing of water quality," 2023, Scientific Data
  • "The impact of spatial resolution on inland water quality monitoring from space," 2024, Environmental Research Communications
  • "Author Correction: GLORIA - A globally representative hyperspectral in situ dataset for optical sensing of water quality," 2023, Scientific Data
  • "Bio-Optical Measurements Indicative of Biogeochemical Transformations of Ocean Waters by Coral Reefs," 2022, Remote Sensing
  • "Demonstration of a Modular Prototype End-to-End Simulator for Aquatic Remote Sensing Applications," 2023, Sensors

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Arnold G. Dekker include:

  • Nima Pahlevan
  • Janet Anstee
  • Nathan Drayson
  • Moritz K. Lehmann
  • Daniela Gurlin

Common publication venues for their work are:

  • Scientific Data
  • Environmental Research Communications
  • Remote Sensing
  • Sensors
  • International Journal of Remote Sensing

Best Publications

  • A review of ocean color remote sensing methods and statistical techniques for the detection, mapping and analysis of phytoplankton blooms in coastal and open oceans

    David Blondeau-Patissier;James F.R. Gower;Arnold G. Dekker;Arnold G. Dekker;Stuart R. Phinn

  • Satellite hyperspectral remote sensing for estimating estuarine and coastal water quality

    V.E. Brando;A.G. Dekker

  • Detection of optical water quality parameters for eutrophic waters by high resolution remote sensing

    A.G. Dekker

  • The use of the Thematic Mapper for the analysis of eutrophic lakes: a case study in the Netherlands.

    A. G. Dekker;S. W. M. Peters

  • Mapping seagrass species, cover and biomass in shallow waters : An assessment of satellite multi-spectral and airborne hyper-spectral imaging systems in Moreton Bay (Australia)

    Stuart Phinn;Chris Roelfsema;Arnold Dekker;Vittoro Brando

  • Analytical algorithms for lake water TSM estimation for retrospective analyses of TM and SPOT sensor data

    A. G. Dekker;R. J. Vos;S. W. M. Peters

  • Assessment of water quality in Lake Garda (Italy) using Hyperion

    Claudia Giardino;Vittorio E. Brando;Arnold G. Dekker;Niklas Strömbeck

  • Intercomparison of shallow water bathymetry, hydro‐optics, and benthos mapping techniques in Australian and Caribbean coastal environments

    Arnold G. Dekker;Arnold G. Dekker;Stuart R. Phinn;Janet Anstee;Paul Bissett

  • The Australian Geoscience Data Cube - foundations and lessons learned

    Adam Lewis;Simon Oliver;Leo Lymburner;Ben Evans

  • Comparison of remote sensing data, model results and in situ data for total suspended matter (TSM) in the southern Frisian lakes.

    A.G. Dekker;R.J. Vos;S.W.M. Peters

  • A physics based retrieval and quality assessment of bathymetry from suboptimal hyperspectral data

    Vittorio E. Brando;Janet M. Anstee;Magnus Wettle;Arnold G. Dekker

  • Measuring freshwater aquatic ecosystems: The need for a hyperspectral global mapping satellite mission

    Erin Lee Hestir;Erin Lee Hestir;Vittorio E. Brando;Mariano Bresciani;Claudia Giardino

  • Retrospective seagrass change detection in a shallow coastal tidal Australian lake

    Arnold G. Dekker;Vittorio Ernesto Brando;Janet M. Anstee

  • Laboratory measurements of angular distributions of light scattered by phytoplankton and silt

    H. Volten;J. F. de Haan;J. W. Hovenier;R. Schreurs

  • Modeling spectral discrimination of Great Barrier Reef benthic communities by remote sensing instruments

    Tiit Kutser;Arnold G. Dekker;William Skirving

  • Quantitative modeling of inland water quality for high-resolution MSS systems

    A.G. Dekker;T.J. Malthus;E. Seyhan

  • Imaging Spectrometry of Water

    Arnold G. Dekker;Vittorio E. Brando;Janet M. Anstee;Nicole Pinnel

  • Satellite sensor requirements for monitoring essential biodiversity variables of coastal ecosystems

    Frank E. Muller‐Karger;Erin Hestir;Christiana Ade;Kevin Turpie

  • Imaging Spectrometry of Inland and Coastal Waters: State of the Art, Achievements and Perspectives

    Claudia Giardino;Vittorio Brando;Peter Gege;Nicole Pinnel

  • GLORIA - A globally representative hyperspectral in situ dataset for optical sensing of water quality

    Unknown

  • Inter-annual variability of wet season freshwater plume extent into the Great Barrier Reef lagoon based on satellite coastal ocean colour observations

    Thomas Schroeder;Michelle J. Devlin;Vittorio E. Brando;Arnold G. Dekker

  • Dispersal of suspended sediments and nutrients in the Great Barrier Reef lagoon during river-discharge events: conclusions from satellite remote sensing and concurrent flood-plume sampling

    Jon Brodie;Thomas Schroeder;Ken Rohde;John Faithful

Frequent Co-Authors

Vittorio E. Brando
Vittorio E. Brando National Research Council (CNR)
Stuart R. Phinn
Stuart R. Phinn University of Queensland
Chris Roelfsema
Chris Roelfsema University of Queensland
Tiit Kutser
Tiit Kutser University of Tartu
Claudia Giardino
Claudia Giardino National Research Council (CNR)
Menghua Wang
Menghua Wang National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Simon J. Allen
Simon J. Allen University of Zurich
William J. Skirving
William J. Skirving National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Tim R. McVicar
Tim R. McVicar Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Peter A. Thompson
Peter A. Thompson CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens the door to a variety of related online degrees that complement and expand career opportunities in this dynamic field. For those interested in the Earth's physical processes, an online geoscience degree offers a strong foundation in geology, mineralogy, and earth systems, essential for roles in environmental consulting and resource management.

Incorporating technology and spatial analysis is key in modern environmental work. Earning a geographic information systems degree provides skills in mapping and data analysis, crucial for monitoring environmental changes and urban planning.

For those drawn to leadership and policy, pursuing one of the best online MPA programs can prepare you for influential roles in government or non-profits focused on sustainability and environmental regulation.

Understanding human behavior and societal challenges is also vital. An online sociology bachelor programs equips students with perspectives on social dynamics and environmental justice, enhancing advocacy and community engagement efforts.

Best Scientists Citing Arnold G. Dekker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles