World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 77 18364 17253 1664 1592 272 24023

Argyro Syngelaki publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Argyro Syngelaki between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Argyro Syngelaki published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 19.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2021. 43 of the 335 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2021. 2009: 1 publication 2010: 11 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 27 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 26 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 31 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 23 publications
2009 2025

335 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Argyro Syngelaki: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 1
2010 11
2011 21
2012 27
2013 26
2014 16
2015 12
2016 13
2017 26
2018 19
2019 18
2020 19
2021 31
2022 25
2023 27
2024 20
2025 23
Total 335
Download as CSV

Argyro Syngelaki publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Argyro Syngelaki sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 272 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722 272
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Argyro Syngelaki D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Argyro Syngelaki sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730 77
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Argyro Syngelaki is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on Obstetrics and Gynecology, accounting for a significant portion of their publications.

Their work covers several related subfields, including Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, and Immunology. This multidisciplinary approach reflects an engagement with both clinical and public health aspects of maternal and child health.

Key research topics addressed by Syngelaki include:

  • Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
  • Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis

Their recent publications demonstrate ongoing contributions to high-impact journals in their domain. Notable papers include:

  • "ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of 11-14-week ultrasound scan," published in 2023 in Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • "Pravastatin Versus Placebo in Pregnancies at High Risk of Term Preeclampsia," published in 2021 in Circulation
  • "Early vaginal progesterone versus placebo in twin pregnancies for the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: a randomized, double-blind trial," published in 2020 in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • "Screening for pre-eclampsia at 11-13 weeks' gestation: use of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A, placental growth factor or both," published in 2020 in Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • "Impact of new definitions of preeclampsia at term on identification of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes," published in 2020 in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Syngelaki frequently collaborates with other researchers in their field. The most frequent co-authors are:

  • K. H. Nicolaides
  • Ranjit Akolekar
  • Alan Wright
  • Peter von Dadelszen
  • Laura A. Magee

Their publications predominantly appear in specialized journals related to Obstetrics and Gynecology. The most common publication venues include:

  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
  • Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey
  • Hypertension

Best Publications

  • Aspirin Versus Placebo in Pregnancies at High Risk for Preterm Preeclampsia

    Daniel Lorber Orber D.L. Rolnik;David Wright;Liona L.C. Poon;Liona L.C. Poon;Neil O'Gorman

  • Prediction of early, intermediate and late pre-eclampsia from maternal factors, biophysical and biochemical markers at 11-13 weeks.

    Ranjit Akolekar;Argyro Syngelaki;Argyro Syngelaki;Rita Sarquis;Rita Sarquis;Mona Zvanca;Mona Zvanca

  • Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Fetal Trisomies in a Routinely Screened First-Trimester Population

    Kypros H. Nicolaides;Argyro Syngelaki;Ghalia Ashoor;Cahit Birdir

  • Competing Risks Model in Early Screening for Preeclampsia by Biophysical and Biochemical Markers

    Ranjit Akolekar;Argyro Syngelaki;Leona Poon;David Wright

  • Challenges in the diagnosis of fetal non‐chromosomal abnormalities at 11–13 weeks

    Argyro Syngelaki;Argyro Syngelaki;Teodora Chelemen;Themistoklis Dagklis;Lindsey Allan

  • Competing risks model in screening for preeclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11-13 weeks gestation

    Neil O'Gorman;David Wright;Argyro Syngelaki;Ranjit Akolekar

  • Maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: a cohort study

    A. Khalil;A. Syngelaki;A. Syngelaki;N. Maiz;Y. Zinevich;Y. Zinevich

  • Fetal fraction in maternal plasma cell‐free DNA at 11–13 weeks' gestation: relation to maternal and fetal characteristics

    G. Ashoor;A. Syngelaki;L. C. Y. Poon;J. C. Rezende

  • Competing risks model in screening for preeclampsia by maternal characteristics and medical history.

    David Wright;Argyro Syngelaki;Ranjit Akolekar;Leona C. Poon

  • Chromosome-selective sequencing of maternal plasma cell–free DNA for first-trimester detection of trisomy 21 and trisomy 18

    Ghalia Ashoor;Argyro Syngelaki;Marion Wagner;Cahit Birdir

  • ASPRE trial: performance of screening for preterm pre‐eclampsia

    D. L. Rolnik;D. Wright;L. C. Y. Poon;L. C. Y. Poon;A. Syngelaki

  • Screening for pre-eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11-13 weeks' gestation.

    M.Y. Tan;M.Y. Tan;Argyro Syngelaki;Liona Poon;Liona Poon;Daniel Lorber Orber D.L. Rolnik

  • Metformin versus Placebo in Obese Pregnant Women without Diabetes Mellitus

    Argyro Syngelaki;Kypros H Nicolaides;Jyoti Balani;Steve Hyer

  • Multicenter screening for pre-eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11-13 weeks' gestation: comparison with NICE guidelines and ACOG recommendations.

    N. O'Gorman;D. Wright;L. C. Poon;L. C. Poon;D. L. Rolnik

  • Validation of targeted sequencing of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for non-invasive prenatal detection of aneuploidy of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y

    K. H. Nicolaides;K. H. Nicolaides;A. Syngelaki;M. Gil;V. Atanasova

  • A Competing Risks Model in Early Screening for Preeclampsia

    David Wright;Ranjit Akolekar;Argyro Syngelaki;Leona C Y Poon

  • Prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11 to 13 weeks

    Surabhi Nanda;Mina Savvidou;Argyro Syngelaki;Ranjit Akolekar

  • Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts

    K. H. Nicolaides;D. Wright;A. Syngelaki;A. Wright

  • Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of early screening for pre‐eclampsia by NICE guidelines and a method combining maternal factors and biomarkers: results of SPREE

    M. Y. Tan;D. Wright;A. Syngelaki;R. Akolekar

  • Aspirin Versus Placebo in Pregnancies at High Risk for Preterm Preeclampsia

    D.L. Rolnik;D. Wright;L.C. Poon;N. O’Gorman

Frequent Co-Authors

Kypros H. Nicolaides
Kypros H. Nicolaides King's College London
Asma Khalil
Asma Khalil St George's, University of London
David S. Wishart
David S. Wishart University of Alberta
Nigel Klein
Nigel Klein University College London
Lindsey D. Allan
Lindsey D. Allan King's College London
Philip Stanier
Philip Stanier University College London
Liang Li
Liang Li University of Alberta
Hanns-Ulrich Marschall
Hanns-Ulrich Marschall University of Gothenburg
Laura A. Magee
Laura A. Magee King's College London
Paul T. Seed
Paul T. Seed King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in medicine but seeking flexible study options, there are several related online degrees and career pathways to consider in healthcare. Studying online can open doors to clinical, administrative, and specialized roles, often with more affordable tuition and adaptable schedules.

Prospective nurses can look into the cheapest dnp programs online to advance their nursing careers while balancing work and family obligations. Meanwhile, those passionate about pharmacy may explore online pharmd programs for a flexible route toward becoming a licensed pharmacist.

If you are interested in the administrative side of health care, online schools for health information management offer programs that focus on medical records, compliance, and data security—key fields in a digital health environment. Alternatively, finding out how much does it cost to become a medical coder can help you start a vital healthcare support career from home, often within a short period.

Choosing the right online program requires careful research into accreditation, tuition, and long-term career potential. These pathways ensure that a career in healthcare remains accessible to motivated students everywhere.

Best Scientists Citing Argyro Syngelaki

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles