World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Lindsey D. Allan publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lindsey D. Allan sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Lindsey D. Allan D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lindsey D. Allan sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lindsey D. Allan is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom and has contributed to multiple research areas within the field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields including Surgery, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine.

Allan's research covers diverse main topics such as:

  • Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Actinomycetales infections and treatment
  • Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
  • Intestinal Malrotation and Obstruction Disorders

Recent publications by Lindsey D. Allan include:

  • "A plant-based high energy and protein enteral tube feed is highly tolerated, complied with and accepted, and decreases feeding time per day in home enterally tube fed patients" (2023, Clinical Nutrition ESPEN)
  • "Pulmonary actinomycosis presenting with empyema" (2023, BMJ Case Reports)
  • "Managing oral diet following a diagnosis of sub-acute malignant bowel obstruction: Results of the 4-step bounced diet feasibility study" (2023, Clinical Nutrition ESPEN)
  • "Large-scale acute hospital bed and mattress implementations: insights and recommendations" (2024, British Journal of Healthcare Management)
  • "SOCCER Script: A Patient Safety Tool During Cardioversion Procedures" (2023, Heart Lung and Circulation)

Publication venues where Allan frequently appears include:

  • Clinical Nutrition ESPEN
  • BMJ Case Reports
  • British Journal of Healthcare Management
  • Heart Lung and Circulation
  • Blood

Collaborations with other researchers form a notable aspect of Allan's work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • C. Griffen
  • Nicola Wyer
  • Y. Dube
  • Joseph H. Bates
  • H. Meanwell

Best Publications

  • Prospective diagnosis of 1,006 consecutive cases of congenital heart disease in the fetus☆

    Lindsey D. Allan;Gurleen K. Sharland;Anna Milburn;Susan M. Lockhart

  • Challenges in the diagnosis of fetal non‐chromosomal abnormalities at 11–13 weeks

    Argyro Syngelaki;Argyro Syngelaki;Teodora Chelemen;Themistoklis Dagklis;Lindsey Allan

  • Ebstein's anomaly: presentation and outcome from fetus to adult.

    David S. Celermajer;Catherine Bull;Janice A. Till;Seamus Cullen

  • ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic screening examination of the fetal heart

    JS Carvalho;LD Allan;R Chaoui;JA Copel

  • Recurrence risks in offspring of adults with major heart defects: results from first cohort of British collaborative study

    J Burn;P Brennan;J Little;S Holloway

  • Balloon dilatation of the aortic valve in the fetus: a report of two cases.

    D J Maxwell;Lindsey Allan;M J Tynan

  • Echocardiographic and anatomical correlates in the fetus.

    L D Allan;M J Tynan;S Campbell;J L Wilkinson

  • World experience of percutaneous ultrasound-guided balloon valvuloplasty in human fetuses with severe aortic valve obstruction.

    Thomas Kohl;Gurleen Sharland;Lindsey D Allan;Ulrich Gembruch

  • Prenatal Screening for Congenital Heart Disease

    Lindsey D. Allan;Diane C. Crawford;Sunder K. Chita;Michael J. Tynan

  • Screening for congenital heart disease prenatally. Results of a 2 1/2-year study in the South East Thames Region.

    Gurleen K. Sharland;Lindsey D. Allan

  • M-mode echocardiography in the developing human fetus.

    L D Allan;M C Joseph;E G Boyd;S Campbell

  • Fetal cardiac abnormalities identified prior to 14 weeks' gestation

    I. C. Huggon;T. Ghi;A. C. Cook;N. Zosmer

  • Evidence of redistribution of cardiac output in asymmetrical growth retardation

    Widad Al-Ghazali;Sunder K. Chita;Michael G. Chapman;Lindsey D. Allan

  • The natural history of the hypoplastic left heart syndrome

    Lindsey D. Allan;Gurleen Sharland;Michael J. Tynan

  • Evaluation of fetal arrhythmias by echocardiography.

    L D Allan;R H Anderson;I D Sullivan;S Campbell

  • Outcome of isolated congenital complete heart block diagnosed in utero.

    A. M. M. Groves;L. D. Allan;E. Rosenthal

  • ISUOG consensus statement: what constitutes a fetal echocardiogram?

    W. Lee;L. Allan;J. S. Carvalho;R. Chaoui

  • Prognosis in Fetal Diaphragmatic Hernia

    G. K. Sharland;S. M. Lockhart;A. J. Heward;L. D. Allan

  • Flecainide in the treatment of fetal tachycardias.

    L D Allan;S K Chita;G K Sharland;D Maxwell

  • Tricuspid regurgitation in the diagnosis of chromosomal anomalies in the fetus at 11–14 weeks of gestation

    I C Huggon;D B DeFigueiredo;L D Allan

Frequent Co-Authors

Kypros H. Nicolaides
Kypros H. Nicolaides King's College London
Robert H. Anderson
Robert H. Anderson Newcastle University
Argyro Syngelaki
Argyro Syngelaki King's College London
Stuart Campbell
Stuart Campbell University of Cambridge
Siew Yen Ho
Siew Yen Ho Imperial College London
Robyn J. Barst
Robyn J. Barst Columbia University
David S. Celermajer
David S. Celermajer Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
John E. Deanfield
John E. Deanfield University College London
Norman H. Silverman
Norman H. Silverman University of California, San Francisco
Julian Little
Julian Little University of Ottawa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine-related careers in the USA has never been more accessible, thanks to a wide variety of affordable online programs. For those looking to advance in nursing or pivot into healthcare, there are practical and budget-friendly study options available. For example, nurses seeking leadership roles can benefit from the cheapest dnp online program, which offers cost-effective routes to a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree.

Registered nurses looking to elevate their credentials may consider cheap rn to bsn programs—ideal for balancing studies with work and personal commitments. Meanwhile, those with a non-nursing background interested in a fast-track entry to the nursing field can explore the cheapest direct entry msn programs and online bsn programs for non nurses to quickly gain essential qualifications.

Regardless of your starting point, these online pathways offer flexibility and affordability for building a rewarding healthcare career in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Lindsey D. Allan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles