World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
António J.A. Nogueira

António J.A. Nogueira

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 46 6200 5952 33 33 139 6249

António J.A. Nogueira publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by António J.A. Nogueira between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. António J.A. Nogueira published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2019. 5 of the 160 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2019. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication
1991 2025

160 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
António J.A. Nogueira: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 1
1995 1
1996 2
1997 0
1998 0
1999 2
2000 4
2001 2
2002 3
2003 3
2004 4
2005 4
2006 7
2007 9
2008 10
2009 9
2010 4
2011 5
2012 4
2013 11
2014 10
2015 4
2016 11
2017 7
2018 10
2019 12
2020 4
2021 2
2022 4
2023 4
2024 4
2025 1
Total 160
Download as CSV

António J.A. Nogueira publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where António J.A. Nogueira sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 139 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544 139
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

António J.A. Nogueira D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where António J.A. Nogueira sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291 46
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

António J.A. Nogueira is affiliated with the University of Aveiro in Portugal. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. They have published extensively on topics related to environmental toxicology and ecotoxicology, genetics and neurodevelopmental disorders, and the impact of toxic organic pollutants.

The main fields of study for António J.A. Nogueira include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

The subfields of their research encompass:

  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Genetics
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Pollution
  • Materials Chemistry

Key topics in their work cover:

  • Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Genomic Variations and Chromosomal Abnormalities
  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Nanoparticles: Synthesis and Applications
  • Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity

Frequent coauthors include Paula Jorge, Bárbara Rodrigues, Vanessa Sousa, Fátima Jesus, and Joana Luísa Pereira, reflecting collaborative work across multiple studies.

Publication venues where António J.A. Nogueira's work has appeared include:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Environmental Science & Policy
  • Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture
  • Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Notable recent papers by António J.A. Nogueira are:

  • A review on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons distribution in freshwater ecosystems and their toxicity to benthic fauna, 2022, The Science of The Total Environment
  • The aquaculture supply chain in the time of covid-19 pandemic: Vulnerability, resilience, solutions and priorities at the global scale, 2021, Environmental Science & Policy
  • The Synergistic Impacts of Anthropogenic Stressors and COVID-19 on Aquaculture: A Current Global Perspective, 2021, Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture
  • Differences in toxicity and accumulation of metal from copper oxide nanomaterials compared to copper sulphate in zebrafish embryos: Delayed hatching, the chorion barrier and physiological effects, 2023, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
  • Do Freshwater and Marine Bivalves Differ in Their Response to Wildfire Ash? Effects on the Antioxidant Defense System and Metal Body Burden, 2023, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Best Publications

  • Terrestrial avoidance behaviour tests as screening tool to assess soil contamination.

    Susana Loureiro;Amadeu M.V.M. Soares;António J.A. Nogueira

  • Toxicity of binary mixtures of metals and pyrethroid insecticides to Daphnia magna Straus. Implications for multi-substance risks assessment

    Carlos Barata;D.J. Baird;A.J.A. Nogueira;A.M.V.M. Soares

  • Pesticides in Brazilian freshwaters: a critical review.

    A. F. Albuquerque;J. S. Ribeiro;F. Kummrow;F. Kummrow;A. J. A. Nogueira;A. J. A. Nogueira

  • Effect of Endosulfan and Parathion on Energy Reserves and Physiological Parameters of the Terrestrial Isopod Porcellio dilatatus

    Sónia Ribeiro;J.P. Sousa;A.J.A. Nogueira;A.M.V.M. Soares

  • Use, fate and ecological risks of antibiotics applied in tilapia cage farming in Thailand

    Andreu Rico;Rhaul Oliveira;Sakchai McDonough;Arrienne Matser

  • In vitro and in vivo inhibition of Daphnia magna acetylcholinesterase by surfactant agents: possible implications for contamination biomonitoring.

    L Guilhermino;M N Lacerda;António J A Nogueira;Amadeu Soares

  • Growth and extremely high production of the non-indigenous invasive species Corbicula fluminea (Muller, 1774): Possible implications for ecosystem functioning

    Ronaldo Sousa;António J.A. Nogueira;Miguel B. Gaspar;Carlos Antunes

  • Effects of oxytetracycline and amoxicillin on development and biomarkers activities of zebrafish (Danio rerio)

    Rhaul Oliveira;Sakchai McDonough;Jessica C.L. Ladewig;Amadeu M.V.M. Soares

  • Cholinesterase and glutathione-S-transferase activities in freshwater invertebrates as biomarkers to assess pesticide contamination.

    Inês Domingues;Ana Raquel Agra;Kieran Monaghan;Amadeu M.V.M. Soares

  • Exploring variability in environmental impact risk from human activities across aquatic ecosystems

    Florian Borgwardt;Leonie Robinson;Daniel Trauner;Heliana Teixeira

  • Key criteria for developing ecosystem service indicators to inform decision making

    Alexander P.E. van Oudenhoven;Matthias Schröter;Evangelina G. Drakou;Ilse R. Geijzendorffer

  • Feeding behaviour of the terrestrial isopod Porcellionides pruinosus Brandt, 1833 (Crustacea, Isopoda) in response to changes in food quality and contamination.

    Susana Loureiro;Alexandra Sampaio;Ana Brandão;António J.A. Nogueira

  • Assessing lethal and sub-lethal effects of trichlorfon on different trophic levels

    Sónia Coelho;Rhaul Oliveira;Susana Pereira;Carolina Musso

  • Evaluation of the toxicity of two soils from Jales Mine (Portugal) using aquatic bioassays.

    Susana Loureiro;Abel L.G. Ferreira;Amadeu M.V.M. Soares;António J.A. Nogueira

  • Effects of Cadmium and Zinc on the feeding behaviour of two freshwater crustaceans: Atyaephyra desmarestii (Decapoda) and Echinogammarus meridionalis (Amphipoda)

    J.L.T. Pestana;A. Ré;A.J.A. Nogueira;A.M.V.M. Soares

  • Evaluation of the effects, on canopy arthropods, of two agricultural management systems to control pests in olive groves from north-east of Portugal

    Sónia A.P. Santos;José A. Pereira;Laura M. Torres;António J.A. Nogueira

  • Impact of chemical exposure on the fish Pomatoschistus microps Krøyer (1838) in estuaries of the Portuguese Northwest coast

    M. Monteiro;C. Quintaneiro;A.J.A. Nogueira;F. Morgado

  • Brominated, chlorinated and phosphate organic contaminants in house dust from Portugal

    Sónia D. Coelho;Sónia D. Coelho;Ana C.A. Sousa;Ana C.A. Sousa;Ana C.A. Sousa;Tomohiko Isobe;Tomohiko Isobe;Joon-Woo Kim

  • Ionic-liquid-based aqueous biphasic systems for improved detection of bisphenol A in human fluids

    Helena Passos;Ana C. A. Sousa;Ana C. A. Sousa;M. Ramiro Pastorinho;António J. A. Nogueira

  • Risk to the supply of ecosystem services across aquatic ecosystems.

    Fiona Culhane;Heliana Teixeira;Antonio J.A. Nogueira;Florian Borgwardt

  • Toxicity Assessment of Two Soils from Jales Mine (Portugal) Using Plants: Growth and Biochemical Parameters

    Susana Loureiro;Conceição Santos;Glória Pinto;Armando Costa

  • Ecotoxicological effects, water quality standards and risk assessment for the anti-diabetic metformin.

    Aline Andrade Godoy;Inês Domingues;António José Arsénia Nogueira;Fábio Kummrow;Fábio Kummrow

Frequent Co-Authors

Amadeu M.V.M. Soares
Amadeu M.V.M. Soares University of Aveiro
Ana I. Lillebø
Ana I. Lillebø University of Aveiro
Heliana Teixeira
Heliana Teixeira University of Aveiro
Tomohiko Isobe
Tomohiko Isobe National Institute for Environmental Studies
Lúcia Guilhermino
Lúcia Guilhermino University of Porto
Shinsuke Tanabe
Shinsuke Tanabe Ehime University
James F. Ranville
James F. Ranville Colorado School of Mines
José Alberto Pereira
José Alberto Pereira Polytechnic Institute of Bragança
Susana Loureiro
Susana Loureiro University of Aveiro
Paul J. Van den Brink
Paul J. Van den Brink Wageningen University & Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can expand career opportunities. Online doctoral programs without dissertation requirements offer a flexible route for professionals who want to advance their education without undergoing the traditional dissertation process. This option is particularly valuable for those balancing work and study.

Educators looking to move from a master's level EdS to EdD program can find pathways that integrate leadership and policy development, which are crucial for environmental education and advocacy roles. These programs prepare students for higher administrative and academic positions within the field.

Social work intersects with environmental sciences through community outreach and sustainability projects. Pursuing affordable online general studies degree programs or accredited DSW programs online allows students to gain interdisciplinary skills that address social and environmental challenges collectively.

Exploring these diverse degree options can help you build a versatile career, whether you aim to influence policy, engage in scientific research, or lead environmental initiatives. For more detailed information, check out online doctoral programs without dissertation, eds to edd program, dsw programs online, and affordable online general studies degree for more guidance.

Best Scientists Citing António J.A. Nogueira

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles