World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Anthony W. K. Gaillard

Anthony W. K. Gaillard

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9679 9054 426 412 97 10431

Anthony W. K. Gaillard publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anthony W. K. Gaillard between 1973 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anthony W. K. Gaillard published across 49 years, from 1973 to 2021, averaging 2.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 1996. 3 of the 109 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 1996. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 2 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 4 publications 1980: 5 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 5 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 2 publications
1973 2021

109 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anthony W. K. Gaillard: publications per year, 1973 to 2021
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 2
1975 3
1976 3
1977 2
1978 1
1979 4
1980 5
1981 5
1982 0
1983 3
1984 2
1985 3
1986 5
1987 0
1988 2
1989 1
1990 0
1991 0
1992 1
1993 5
1994 4
1995 2
1996 12
1997 9
1998 6
1999 1
2000 1
2001 1
2002 0
2003 2
2004 0
2005 1
2006 3
2007 2
2008 3
2009 1
2010 2
2011 2
2012 0
2013 0
2014 1
2015 0
2016 2
2017 1
2018 1
2019 1
2020 1
2021 2
Total 109
Download as CSV

Anthony W. K. Gaillard publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony W. K. Gaillard sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 97 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 97
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Anthony W. K. Gaillard D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony W. K. Gaillard sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Cognition
  • Neuroscience
  • Social psychology

His primary scientific interests are in Neuroscience, Event-related potential, Contingent negative variation, Audiology and Communication. His studies deal with areas such as Cerebral cortex, Discrimination learning, Multimedia and Human–computer interaction as well as Event-related potential. His Contingent negative variation research includes themes of Cognitive psychology, Arousal and Visual perception.

His Audiology study combines topics in areas such as Breathing, Heart rate variability, Heart rate, Simulation and Eye movement. Anthony W. K. Gaillard combines subjects such as Stimulus and Mismatch negativity, P3a with his study of Communication. His research integrates issues of Evoked potential, Pre-attentive processing, Dichotic listening and Sensory memory in his study of P3a.

His most cited work include:

  • Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted ☆ (2144 citations)
  • Psychophysiological brain research. (332 citations)
  • Energetics and Human Information Processing (329 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Audiology, Social psychology, Developmental psychology, Contingent negative variation and Workload. His work on Evoked potential is typically connected to Vertex as part of general Audiology study, connecting several disciplines of science. Anthony W. K. Gaillard has included themes like Psychosocial and Information processing in his Social psychology study.

His Contingent negative variation research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Cognitive psychology, Arousal and Electrophysiology. The Communication study combines topics in areas such as Stimulus, Neuroscience, Mismatch negativity and Event-related potential. In general Mismatch negativity, his work in P3a is often linked to Feature linking many areas of study.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Audiology (28.57%)
  • Social psychology (18.57%)
  • Developmental psychology (15.71%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2003-2021)?

  • Social psychology (18.57%)
  • Information processing (8.57%)
  • Rigidity (2.86%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Anthony W. K. Gaillard mainly investigates Social psychology, Information processing, Rigidity, Clinical psychology and Applied psychology. His research in Social psychology intersects with topics in Control, Six degrees of freedom, Robotic arm and Human–computer interaction. As part of his studies on Information processing, Anthony W. K. Gaillard frequently links adjacent subjects like Cognitive skill.

Anthony W. K. Gaillard interconnects Knowledge management, Team composition and Team effectiveness in the investigation of issues within Rigidity. His Clinical psychology investigation overlaps with other disciplines such as Stress, Workload, Occupational safety and health, Human factors and ergonomics and Suicide prevention. His biological study deals with issues like Affect, which deal with fields such as Transactive memory.

Between 2003 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Hardiness and the response to stressful situations: Investigating mediating processes (63 citations)
  • The Effects of Physical Threat on Team Processes During Complex Task Performance (17 citations)
  • A methodology to compensate for individual differences in psychophysiological assessment (10 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Cognition
  • Social psychology
  • Artificial intelligence

His scientific interests lie mostly in Social psychology, Applied psychology, Information processing, Oxygen level and Developmental psychology. His work on Personality Assessment Inventory as part of his general Social psychology study is frequently connected to Comparability, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science. His studies in Developmental psychology integrate themes in fields like Coping, Coping behavior and Self-efficacy.

Best Publications

  • Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted ☆

    R. Näätänen;A.W.K. Gaillard;S. Mäntysalo

  • Physiological workload reactions to increasing levels of task difficulty.

    J. A. Veltman;A. W. K. Gaillard

  • Psychophysiological brain research.

    C.H.M. Brunia;A.W.K. Gaillard;A. Kok

  • Physiological indices of workload in a simulated flight task

    J.A. Veltman;A.W.K. Gaillard

  • 5 The Orienting Reflex and the N2 Deflection of the Event-Related Potential (ERP)

    R. Näätänen;A.W.K. Gaillard

  • 13 Sensory and Motor Aspects of the Contingent Negative Variation

    John W. Rohrbaugh;Anthony W.K. Gaillard

  • Energetics and Human Information Processing

    Robert Hockey;Anthony W. K. Gaillard

  • Tutorials in event related potential research : endogenous components

    Anthony W. K. Gaillard;Walter Ritter

  • Comparing the concepts of mental load and stress

    A. W. K. Gaillard

  • Hardiness and the response to stressful situations: Investigating mediating processes

    Roos Delahaij;Anthony W.K. Gaillard;Karen van Dam

  • Effects of warning-signal modality on the contingent negative variation (CNV).

    A.W.K. Gaillard

  • Cognition and event-related potentials. I. The relation of negative potentials and cognitive processes.

    Walter Ritter;Judith M. Ford;Anthony W. K. Gaillard;M. Russell Harter

  • Brain Potential Correlates of Voluntary and Involuntary Attention

    R. NääTäNEN;A.W.K. Gaillard;S. MäNTYSALO

  • The Late CNV Wave: Preparation Versus Expectancy

    A. W. K. Gaillard

  • Performance Decrement During Prolonged Night Driving

    J. B. J. Riemersma;A. F. Sanders;C. Wildervanck;A. W. Gaillard

  • Mental load and work stress as two types of energy mobilization

    A. W. K. Gaillard;C. J. E. Wientjes

  • Attention effects on auditory EPs as a function of inter-stimulus interval.

    R. Näätänen;A.W.K. Gaillard;C.A. Varey

  • Stress, productiviteit en gezondheid

    A.W.K. Gaillard

  • Stress, Workload, and Fatigue as Three Biobehavioral States : A General Overview

    A.W.K. Gaillard

  • Indices of Mental Workload in a Complex Task Environment

    J.A. Veltman;A.W.K. Gaillard

Frequent Co-Authors

Risto Näätänen
Risto Näätänen University of Tartu
Arnold B. Bakker
Arnold B. Bakker Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jens Jordan
Jens Jordan German Aerospace Center
Walter Ritter
Walter Ritter Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Michael G. H. Coles
Michael G. H. Coles University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
John W. Rohrbaugh
John W. Rohrbaugh Washington University in St. Louis
Abraham P. Buunk
Abraham P. Buunk University of Groningen
Guus L. Van Heck
Guus L. Van Heck Tilburg University
Gijsbertus Mulder
Gijsbertus Mulder University of Groningen
Marta Kutas
Marta Kutas University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online psychology degrees open doors to flexible learning and diverse career opportunities. Whether you aim to work in clinical practice, research, or human resources, there are programs tailored to suit your goals.

Those interested in advanced research or specialized fields may explore the best online doctorate in psychology degree programs ranking in America. For those seeking a master's degree on the West Coast, the online psychology master's programs in California offer a range of options with strong connections to professional networks.

Regional offerings are also available, such as the best online psychology program rankings in Illinois, which highlights accredited programs for students in the Midwest. In the Northeast, learners can review the online psychology degrees in Massachusetts, known for innovative curricula and expert faculty.

Online psychology programs often emphasize flexibility, making them ideal for working professionals. Graduates pursue roles in counseling, education, healthcare, organizational consulting, and more, ensuring a wide range of career pathways in this expanding field.

Best Scientists Citing Anthony W. K. Gaillard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles