World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 41 4958 4597 841 781 177 9129

Alison Fuller publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alison Fuller between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alison Fuller published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2006. 4 of the 185 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2006. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 8 publications 2004: 18 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1990 2025

185 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alison Fuller: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 2
1995 1
1996 1
1997 0
1998 2
1999 1
2000 0
2001 2
2002 1
2003 8
2004 18
2005 11
2006 21
2007 16
2008 9
2009 15
2010 7
2011 13
2012 7
2013 17
2014 6
2015 3
2016 3
2017 6
2018 3
2019 2
2020 1
2021 2
2022 1
2023 0
2024 3
2025 1
Total 185
Download as CSV

Alison Fuller publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alison Fuller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 174–183 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 177 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313 177
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Alison Fuller D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alison Fuller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308 41
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Alison Fuller is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focused on medicine and social sciences. Within these fields, their work addresses subfields including psychiatry and mental health, education, otorhinolaryngology, pediatrics, perinatology, child health, and physiology.

Their academic output is diverse, concentrating on topics such as epilepsy research and treatment, sinusitis and nasal conditions, pharmacological effects and toxicity studies, diet and metabolism studies, management and organizational studies, mental health and patient involvement, and emergency and acute care studies.

Fuller has contributed to several peer-reviewed journals, with publications appearing in venues like Rhinology Journal, Seizure, Public Money & Management, BMJ Open, and the British Journal of Neuroscience Nursing.

  • Mepolizumab in CRSwNP/ECRS and NP: the phase III randomised MERIT trial in Japan, China, and Russia (2024), Rhinology Journal
  • Translating employee-driven innovation in healthcare: Bricolage and the mobilization of scarce resources (2020), Public Money & Management
  • Top Ten epilepsy research priorities: A UK priority setting partnership (2024), Seizure
  • Supporting the ambulance service to safely convey fewer patients to hospital by developing a risk prediction tool: Risk of Adverse Outcomes after a Suspected Seizure (RADOSS)-protocol for the mixed-methods observational RADOSS project (2022), BMJ Open
  • Epilepsy and learning disabilities: benchmarking services to keep patients safe (2025), British Journal of Neuroscience Nursing

Frequent collaborators include Anthony G Marson, Jon M Dickson, F Fujieda, Chenwei Wang, and Mamoru Yoshikawa.

Best Publications

  • Learning as peripheral participation in communities of practice: a reassessment of key concepts in workplace learning

    Alison Fuller;Heather Hodkinson;Phil Hodkinson;Lorna Unwin

  • Learning as Apprentices in the Contemporary UK Workplace: creating and managing expansive and restrictive participation

    Alison Fuller;Lorna Unwin

  • Workplace learning in context

    Alison Fuller;Anne Munro;Helen Rainbird

  • Expansive learning environments : Integrating organizational and personal development

    Alison Fuller;Lorna Unwin

  • Improving Workplace Learning

    Karen Evans;Phil Hodkinson;Helen Rainbird;Lorna Unwin

  • Learning in communities of practice

    A. Fuller

  • Improving Working as Learning

    Alan Felstead;Alison Fuller;Nick Jewson;Lorna Unwin

  • Surveying the scene: learning metaphors, survey design and the workplace context

    Alan Felstead;Alison Fuller;Lorna Unwin;David Norman Ashton

  • Chasing shadows: defining network boundaries in qualitative social network analysis

    Sue Heath;Alison Fuller;Brenda Johnston

  • Reconceptualising apprenticeship: exploring the relationship between work and learning

    Alison Fuller;Lorna Unwin

  • Young people as teachers and learners in the workplace : challenging the novice-expert dichotomy

    Alison Fuller;Lorna Unwin

  • Creating a 'Modern Apprenticeship': A critique of the UK's multi-sector, social inclusion approach

    Alison Fuller;Lorna Unwin

  • The significance of individual biography in workplace learning

    Phil Hodkinson;Heather Hodkinson;Karen Evans;Natasha Kersh

  • Workplace learning and the organization

    Alison Fuller;Lorna Unwin

  • Critiquing theories of learning and communities of practice

    Alison Fuller

  • Creating and using knowledge : an analysis of the differentiated nature of workplace learning environments

    Alison Fuller;Lorna Unwin;Alan Felstead;Nick Jewson

  • Change and continuity in apprenticeship: the resilience of a model of learning

    Alison Fuller;Lorna Unwin

  • Fostering workplace learning: looking through the lens of apprenticeship

    Alison Fuller;Lorna Unwin

  • Improving Learning by Widening Participation in Higher Education

    Miriam David;Ann-Marie Bathmaker;Gill Crozier;Pauline Davis

  • Older and wiser? Workplace learning from the perspective of older employees

    Alison Fuller;Lorna Unwin

Frequent Co-Authors

Lorna Unwin
Lorna Unwin University College London
Alan Felstead
Alan Felstead Cardiff University
Phil Hodkinson
Phil Hodkinson University of Leeds
Diane Reay
Diane Reay University of Cambridge
Anna Vignoles
Anna Vignoles Leverhulme Trust
Gill Crozier
Gill Crozier University of Roehampton
Avan Aihie Sayer
Avan Aihie Sayer Newcastle University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to a variety of flexible online degree options in the USA. Many students choose 1 year master's programs to quickly advance their academic credentials and job prospects, especially for mid-career professionals seeking a fast track to new opportunities.

For those who wish to complete their undergraduate education efficiently, online accelerated bachelor degree programs offer a streamlined path to graduation, saving both time and tuition costs.

Social work is a popular career pathway. Earning a msw degree (Master of Social Work) online equips graduates with both the theoretical and practical skills needed for roles in counseling, advocacy, and clinical practice.

Another growing area is behavior analysis. The bcba programs (Board Certified Behavior Analyst) credential is essential for professionals who want to specialize in behavioral interventions in education, mental health, and community support settings.

Best Scientists Citing Alison Fuller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles