Data Sources and Citation Metrics
The 5th edition of the Research.com Best Business and Management Scientists in Malaysia Ranking is primarily based on bibliometric data sourced from OpenAlex and CrossRef, supplemented by multiple other reputable data sources. These databases provide comprehensive and up-to-date scholarly publication and citation records, forming a solid foundation for the citation-based metrics utilized in this ranking. All relevant bibliometric data were collated on January 12, 2026, ensuring the evaluation reflects the most recent scholarly impact.
A scientist’s position in the ranking is determined by their D-index (Discipline H-index), a metric that uniquely measures scholarly output and citation impact exclusively within the specified discipline—in this case, Business and Management. This approach ensures that each researcher’s standing reflects their contributions specifically to the examined field rather than their overall research profile.
Scope of Research and Selection Criteria
The ranking comprehensively examined 279,971 scientist profiles aggregated from various bibliometric sources across all disciplines, focusing specifically on 27 scientists recognized for their work in Business and Management. To qualify for inclusion, scientists were required to have a D-index of at least 30, reflecting significant discipline-specific research impact. Additionally, the majority of their tier publications needed to be within the Business and Management area to ensure domain relevance.
Selection further accounted for awards and notable achievements in the field, enhancing the contextual rigor of the ranking. The D-index threshold for top researchers is adjusted in increments of 10 based on the estimated total number of scholars in each discipline, thereby guaranteeing that the top 1% of leading experts are represented. Furthermore, qualifying profiles demonstrate a proximity of 30% or less between their general H-index and D-index, indicating a focused and consistent contribution to Business and Management.
Verification and Methodological Rigor
Understanding that raw bibliometric data alone cannot provide an absolute evaluation of scholarly output, the Research.com team implements extensive verification procedures. Every scientist’s profile underwent manual validation and was cross-correlated with publications across a broad spectrum of trusted academic sources to ensure accuracy and authenticity.
While not a direct factor in ranking position, the volume of papers published in prominent journals and conference proceedings serves as a valuable secondary indicator of a scientist’s contributions within their discipline. The final ranking position is assigned based on each researcher’s D-index using data from OpenAlex and CrossRef, which are among the most widely recognized and authoritative bibliometric databases available to the global research community.
For an in-depth understanding of our process, please visit our methodology page.
Research.com’s Mission and Purpose
Research.com is committed to fostering a transparent and data-driven environment for recognizing academic excellence. Our mission is to motivate researchers, industry leaders, and policymakers worldwide to explore where leading experts in various fields are advancing the frontiers of knowledge. By providing clear visibility into who the top researchers are within specific areas, countries, and institutions, we aim to strengthen the global scientific community and facilitate impactful collaborations and informed decision-making.
The meticulous and methodical approach underpinning this ranking underlines our dedication to credibility and accuracy, ensuring stakeholders can rely on Research.com as a trusted source for evaluating scholarly achievement.
