World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
William R. Taylor

William R. Taylor

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 106 6550 6158 90 88 674 40467

William R. Taylor publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by William R. Taylor between 1969 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. William R. Taylor published across 58 years, from 1969 to 2026, averaging 14.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 2012. 29 of the 823 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 47. Peak 47 publications in 2012. 1969: 2 publications 1970: 4 publications 1971: 6 publications 1972: 7 publications 1973: 4 publications 1974: 4 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 7 publications 1977: 5 publications 1978: 6 publications 1979: 4 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 9 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 7 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 16 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 23 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 30 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 47 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 27 publications 2015: 27 publications 2016: 44 publications 2017: 34 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 37 publications 2020: 33 publications 2021: 36 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 47 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 25 publications 2026: 4 publications
1969 2026

823 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
William R. Taylor: publications per year, 1969 to 2026
Year Publications
1969 2
1970 4
1971 6
1972 7
1973 4
1974 4
1975 3
1976 7
1977 5
1978 6
1979 4
1980 4
1981 9
1982 4
1983 7
1984 6
1985 4
1986 5
1987 7
1988 4
1989 5
1990 3
1991 6
1992 2
1993 8
1994 16
1995 4
1996 4
1997 9
1998 5
1999 3
2000 4
2001 11
2002 14
2003 17
2004 23
2005 17
2006 30
2007 14
2008 15
2009 22
2010 18
2011 21
2012 47
2013 19
2014 27
2015 27
2016 44
2017 34
2018 25
2019 37
2020 33
2021 36
2022 23
2023 47
2024 22
2025 25
2026 4
Total 823
Download as CSV

William R. Taylor publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William R. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 661–680 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 674 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340 674
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

William R. Taylor D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William R. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 106–107 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 106 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541 106
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

William R. Taylor is affiliated with ETH Zurich in Switzerland and has a substantial publication record primarily in the field of Medicine, with 288 publications. Their research spans several key subfields, including Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation.

The scientist's work covers multiple important topics within medical research. These include:

  • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
  • Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
  • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders

William R. Taylor has collaborated frequently with a number of co-authors, reflecting active engagement in collaborative research. The most frequent co-authors are:

  • Pascal Schütz
  • Navrag B. Singh
  • Seyyed Hamed Hosseini Nasab
  • John B. Kisiel
  • Renate List

Their work has been published in several preferred scientific venues where they have multiple publications. These include:

  • Gait & Posture
  • Journal of Biomechanics
  • Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Scientific Reports

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by William R. Taylor are:

  • Wearable Inertial Measurement Units for Assessing Gait in Real-World Environments, 2020, Frontiers in Physiology
  • The prone transpsoas technique: preliminary radiographic results of a multicenter experience, 2020, European Spine Journal
  • Prone Transpsoas Technique for Simultaneous Single-Position Access to the Anterior and Posterior Lumbar Spine, 2020, Operative Neurosurgery
  • Assessing the Temporal Organization of Walking Variability: A Systematic Review and Consensus Guidelines on Detrended Fluctuation Analysis, 2020, Frontiers in Physiology
  • Accurate Nonendoscopic Detection of Barrett's Esophagus by Methylated DNA Markers: A Multisite Case Control Study, 2020, The American Journal of Gastroenterology

Best Publications

  • Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

    Burak M. Ozgur;Henry E. Aryan;Luiz Pimenta;William R. Taylor

  • Ipsilateral lobectomy versus bilateral lobar resection in papillary thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of surgical outcome using a novel prognostic scoring system.

    Ian D. Hay;Clive S. Grant;William F. Taylor;William M. McConahey

  • Follicular Thyroid Cancer Treated at the Mayo Clinic, 1946 Through 1970: Initial Manifestations, Pathologic Findings, Therapy, and Outcome

    William M. McCONAHEY;Ian D. Hay;Lewis B. Woolner;Jon A. van Heerden

  • Mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, a measure of diabetic instability.

    George D Molnar;John W Rosevear;Eugene Ackerman

  • Lung cancer screening: the Mayo program.

    Fontana Rs;Sanderson Dr;Woolner Lb;Taylor Wf

  • Neurosurgical management of low-grade astrocytoma of the cerebral hemispheres

    Edward R. Laws;William F. Taylor;Marvin B. Clifton;Haruo Okazaki

  • Thymoma. A clinicopathologic review.

    Jean E. Lewis;Mark R. Wick;Bernd W. Scheithauer;Philip E. Bernatz

  • Cancer risk and life expectancy of children with ulcerative colitis.

    Ghislain J. Devroede;William F. Taylor;William G. Sauer;Raymond J. Jackman

  • Crohn's Disease and Cancer

    David D. Weedon;Roy G. Shorter;Duane M. Ilstrup;Kenneth A. Huizenga

  • Lung Cancer Mortality in the Mayo Lung Project: Impact of Extended Follow-up

    Pamela M. Marcus;Erik J. Bergstralh;Richard M. Fagerstrom;David E. Williams

  • LIVER BIOPSY: COMPLICATIONS IN 1000 INPATIENTS AND OUTPATIENTS

    Jean Perrault;Douglas B. McGill;Beverly J. Ott;William F. Taylor

  • Early lung cancer detection: results of the initial (prevalence) radiologic and cytologic screening in the Mayo Clinic study.

    R S Fontana;D R Sanderson;W F Taylor;L B Woolner

  • Screening for lung cancer. A critique of the Mayo Lung Project.

    Robert S. Fontana;David R. Sanderson;Lewis B. Woolner;William F. Taylor

  • A survey of formal methods for determining the centre of rotation of ball joints.

    Rainald M. Ehrig;William R. Taylor;Georg N. Duda;Markus O. Heller

  • A prospective randomized study of the efficacy of routine elective lymphadenectomy in management of malignant melanoma. Preliminary results.

    Franklin H. Sim;William F. Taylor;John C. Ivins;Douglas J. Pritchard

  • Tibio-femoral loading during human gait and stair climbing.

    William R Taylor;Markus O Heller;Georg Bergmann;Georg N Duda

  • Kinematic measures for assessing gait stability in elderly individuals: a systematic review.

    D. Hamacher;N.B. Singh;J.H. Van Dieën;M.O. Heller

  • SSAP: sequential structure alignment program for protein structure comparison.

    Christine A. Orengo;William R. Taylor

  • Malignant lymphoma of bone

    Mary L. Ostrowski;Krishnan K. Unni;Peter M. Banks;Thomas C. Shives

  • Determination of orthotropic bone elastic constants using FEA and modal analysis

    W.R. Taylor;E. Roland;H. Ploeg;D. Hertig

Frequent Co-Authors

Georg N. Duda
Georg N. Duda Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Thomas C. Smyrk
Thomas C. Smyrk Mayo Clinic
Carsten Perka
Carsten Perka Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Ajay P. Singh
Ajay P. Singh University of South Alabama
Suresh T. Chari
Suresh T. Chari The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Georg Bergmann
Georg Bergmann Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Lewis R. Roberts
Lewis R. Roberts Mayo Clinic
Kenneth K. Wang
Kenneth K. Wang Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in studying Medicine in the USA, there are many alternative online degrees and career pathways in healthcare to consider. For those who enjoy leadership roles, a bachelors in healthcare administration can open doors to hospital management and policy planning.

Advancing your education with affordable options is possible, with several cheapest mha programs available entirely online. An MHA prepares you for high-level administrative roles in healthcare organizations and systems.

For nursing professionals, a 1 year dnp program online offers an accelerated path to the highest clinical nursing credential, allowing you to advance your practice without stepping away from your current job.

Those interested in pharmacy careers can earn credentials through online pharmacy school programs, which provide flexible study options and open opportunities in both clinical and research settings.

Exploring these pathways can help you find the right fit in the rapidly evolving world of healthcare, offering flexible and cost-effective alternatives to traditional on-campus programs.

Best Scientists Citing William R. Taylor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles