World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
101
Citations
40528
World Ranking
7929
National Ranking
455

Werner G. Daniel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Werner G. Daniel sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 524 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Werner G. Daniel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Werner G. Daniel sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts
  • Member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts

Overview

Werner G. Daniel is affiliated with the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg in Germany. Their recent research contributions are published primarily in the journal Chirality, reflecting a focus on topics relevant to this publication.

The recent papers authored include:

  • Issue Information, 2021, Chirality
  • Issue Information, 2021, Chirality
  • Issue Information, 2021, Chirality
  • Issue Information, 2021, Chirality
  • Issue Information, 2023, Chirality

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Werner G. Daniel are:

  • Eiji Yashima
  • Mirasol Matela
  • D Nina
  • Zhiqiang Zhou

All the documented publications are consistently featured in the journal Chirality.

Werner G. Daniel has been recognized as a member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts.

Best Publications

  • Detection of Coronary Artery Stenoses With Thin-Slice Multi-Detector Row Spiral Computed Tomography and Multiplanar Reconstruction

    Dieter Ropers;Ulrich Baum;Karsten Pohle;Katharina Anders

  • Detection of Calcified and Noncalcified Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque by Contrast-Enhanced, Submillimeter Multidetector Spiral Computed Tomography A Segment-Based Comparison With Intravascular Ultrasound

    Stephan Achenbach;Fabian Moselewski;Dieter Ropers;Maros Ferencik

  • Safety of transesophageal echocardiography. A multicenter survey of 10,419 examinations.

    W G Daniel;R Erbel;W Kasper;C A Visser

  • Detection of Coronary Artery Stenoses by Contrast-Enhanced, Retrospectively Electrocardiographically-Gated, Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography

    Stephan Achenbach;Tom Giesler;Dieter Ropers;Stefan Ulzheimer

  • Improvement in the Diagnosis of Abscesses Associated with Endocarditis by Transesophageal Echocardiography

    Werner G. Daniel;Andreas Mügge;Randolph P. Martin;Oliver Lindert

  • Echocardiography in infective endocarditis: Reassessment of prognostic implications of vegetation size determined by the transthoracic and the transesophageal approach

    Andreas Mügge;Werner G. Daniel;Günter Frank;Paul R. Lichtlen

  • ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSIS OF AORTIC DISSECTION

    AliceV. Stanton;Miriam Casey;EoinT. O'Brien;Raimund Erbel

  • Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition

    Stephan Achenbach;Mohamed Marwan;Dieter Ropers;Tiziano Schepis

  • Noninvasive coronary angiography by retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT.

    Stephan Achenbach;Stefan Ulzheimer;Ulrich Baum;Marc Kachelrieß

  • Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in mitral valve disease: An indicator for an increased thromboembolic risk

    Werner G. Daniel;Ulrich Nellessen;Eberhard Schröder;Barbara Nonnast-Daniel

  • Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography--initial experience.

    Stephan Achenbach;Dieter Ropers;Axel Kuettner;Thomas Flohr

  • Usefulness of Multidetector Row Spiral Computed Tomography With 64- × 0.6-mm Collimation and 330-ms Rotation for the Noninvasive Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Stenoses

    Dieter Ropers;Johannes Rixe;Katharina Anders;Axel Küttner

  • Monocytes coexpress endothelial and macrophagocytic lineage markers and form cord-like structures in Matrigel under angiogenic conditions.

    Alexander Schmeisser;Christoph D. Garlichs;Hong Zhang;Saeed Eskafi

  • Atrial Septal Aneurysm in Adult Patients A Multicenter Study Using Transthoracic and Transesophageal Echocardiography

    Andreas Mügge;Werner G. Daniel;Christiane Angermann;Christoph Spes

  • Progression of aortic valve calcification: association with coronary atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk factors.

    Karsten Pohle;Ralph Mäffert;Dieter Ropers;Werner Moshage

  • Effect of medical and surgical therapy on aortic dissection evaluated by transesophageal echocardiography. Implications for prognosis and therapy. The European Cooperative Study Group on Echocardiography.

    R Erbel;H Oelert;J Meyer;M Puth

  • Strain-Rate Imaging During Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography Provides Objective Evidence of Inducible Ischemia

    Jens Uwe Voigt;Bert Exner;Kristin Schmiedehausen;Cord Huchzermeyer

  • Value of Electron-Beam Computed Tomography for the Noninvasive Detection of High-Grade Coronary-Artery Stenoses and Occlusions

    Stephan Achenbach;Werner Moshage;Dieter Ropers;Jörg Nossen

  • Diagnosis of noninfective cardiac mass lesions by two-dimensional echocardiography. Comparison of the transthoracic and transesophageal approaches.

    A Mügge;W G Daniel;A Haverich;P R Lichtlen

  • Noninvasive Visualization of Coronary Arteries Using Contrast-Enhanced Multidetector CT: Influence of Heart Rate on Image Quality and Stenosis Detection

    Tom Giesler;Ulrich Baum;Dieter Ropers;Stefan Ulzheimer

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephan Achenbach
Stephan Achenbach University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Willi A. Kalender
Willi A. Kalender University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Udo Hoffmann
Udo Hoffmann Harvard University
Thomas J. Brady
Thomas J. Brady Harvard University
Roland E. Schmieder
Roland E. Schmieder University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Ik-Kyung Jang
Ik-Kyung Jang Massachusetts General Hospital
Raimund Erbel
Raimund Erbel University of Duisburg-Essen
Peter Hanrath
Peter Hanrath RWTH Aachen University
Suhny Abbara
Suhny Abbara The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Christian W. Hamm
Christian W. Hamm University of Giessen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine isn't limited to traditional medical degrees. Many students are now choosing flexible online programs or alternative healthcare pathways. For those interested in nursing, direct admit nursing programs allow motivated individuals to secure a spot in nursing school directly from high school, reducing uncertainty in their admission journey.

If you prefer a non-clinical role, consider medical billing and coding schools that accept financial aid. These programs open doors to healthcare administrative careers while making education more affordable.

Many aspiring nurses are also seeking absn programs that don't require teas, eliminating the need for exams like TEAS or HESI and lowering barriers for those with a non-nursing bachelor’s degree.

Looking to move into healthcare management? An online healthcare administration associate degree online can offer a fast and flexible path into healthcare leadership roles. Whether you’re seeking patient care or administrative expertise, there are numerous online options for every interest.

Best Scientists Citing Werner G. Daniel

Recently Published Articles