World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
29
Citations
11276
World Ranking
1214
National Ranking
606

Tina Nabatchi publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tina Nabatchi sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 90 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Tina Nabatchi D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tina Nabatchi sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 29 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration
  • Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration
  • Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration
  • Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration

Overview

Tina Nabatchi is affiliated with Syracuse University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of Social Sciences, focusing primarily on Public Administration. Their research spans several subfields including Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions, and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management.

The main topics of Tina Nabatchi's work include Public Policy and Administration Research, Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering, Community Health and Development, Disaster Management and Resilience, E-Government and Public Services, Customer Service Quality and Loyalty, and Forest Management and Policy.

Tina Nabatchi has published in a variety of academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Public Administration Review
  • Public Management Review
  • Policy Design and Practice
  • The American Review of Public Administration
  • Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Tina Nabatchi are:

  • "Rising to Ostrom's challenge: an invitation to walk on the bright side of public governance and public service" (2021), Policy Design and Practice
  • "Different Processes, Different Outcomes? Assessing the Individual-Level Impacts of Public Participation" (2020), Public Administration Review
  • "Collaborative Governance at Scale: Examining the Regimes, Platforms, and System in the State of Oregon" (2022), The American Review of Public Administration
  • "How citizens want to "see" the state: Exploring the relationship between transparency and public values" (2023), Public Administration Review
  • "Monetary and symbolic rewards: do they matter for fostering co-commissioning and co-delivery of public services?" (2023), Public Management Review

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Paul 't Hart
  • Janine O'Flynn
  • Alessandro Sancino
  • Greg Munno
  • Kirk Emerson

Tina Nabatchi has been recognized as a Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration.

Best Publications

  • An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance

    Kirk Emerson;Tina Nabatchi;Stephen Balogh

  • The New Governance: Practices and Processes for Stakeholder and Citizen Participation in the Work of Government

    Lisa Blomgren Bingham;Tina Nabatchi;Rosemary O'Leary

  • Collaborative Governance Regimes

    Kirk Emerson;Tina Nabatchi

  • Varieties of Participation in Public Services: The Who, When, and What of Coproduction

    Tina Nabatchi;Alessandro Sancino;Mariafrancesca Sicilia

  • Putting the “Public” Back in Public Values Research: Designing Participation to Identify and Respond to Values

    Tina Nabatchi

  • Addressing the Citizenship and Democratic Deficits: The Potential of Deliberative Democracy for Public Administration:

    Tina Nabatchi

  • Evaluating the Productivity of Collaborative Governance Regimes: A Performance Matrix

    Kirk Emerson;Tina Nabatchi

  • Direct Public Engagement in Local Government

    Tina Nabatchi;Lisa Blomgren Amsler

  • Public Participation for 21st Century Democracy

    Tina Nabatchi;Matthew Leighninger

  • Public Participation for 21st Century Democracy: Nabatchi/Public

    Tina Nabatchi;Matt Leighninger

  • Democracy in motion : evaluating the practice and impact of deliberative civic engagement

    Tina Nabatchi;John Gastil;Matt Leighninger;G. Michael Weiksner

  • Organizational justice and workplace mediation: a six‐factor model

    Tina Nabatchi;Lisa Blomgren Bingham;David H. Good

  • From Galaxies to Universe A Cross-Disciplinary Review and Analysis of Public Values Publications From 1969 to 2012

    Zeger Van der Wal;Tina Nabatchi;Gjalt de Graaf

  • Public Values Frames in Administration and Governance

    Tina Nabatchi

  • Public Administration in Dark Times: Some Questions for the Future of the Field

    Tina Nabatchi;Holly T. Goerdel;Shelly Peffer

  • Transformative Mediation in the USPS REDRESS Program: Observations of ADR Specialists

    Lisa B. Bingham;Tina Nabatchi

  • The new diagnostic team

    Mark L. Graber;Diana Rusz;Melissa L. Jones;Diana Farm-Franks

  • The Institutionalization of Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Federal Government

    Tina Nabatchi

  • Deliberative Democracy and Citizenship: In Search of the Efficacy Effect

    Tina Nabatchi

  • An Introduction to Deliberative Civic Engagement

    Tina Nabatchi

  • JPART Virtual Issue on Citizen-State Interactions in Public Administration Research

    Morten Jakobsen;Oliver James;Donald Moynihan;Tina Nabatchi

  • Facilitating co-production in public services: management implications from a systematic literature review

    Mariafrancesca Sicilia;Alessandro Sancino;Tina Nabatchi;Enrico Guarini

  • Rising to Ostrom's challenge: an invitation to walk on the bright side of public governance and public service.

    Scott Douglas;Thomas Schillemans;Paul ‘t Hart;Chris Ansell

  • Networks and landscapes: a framework for setting goals and evaluating performance at the large landscape scale

    R Patrick Bixler;Shawn Johnson;Kirk Emerson;Tina Nabatchi

  • Public Administration in Dark Times: Some Questions for the Future of the Field

    Tina Nabatchi;Holly T. Goerdel

Frequent Co-Authors

Rosemary O'Leary
Rosemary O'Leary University of Kansas
Donald P. Moynihan
Donald P. Moynihan University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Brian Head
Brian Head University of Queensland
Christopher Ansell
Christopher Ansell University of California, Berkeley
Matthew Flinders
Matthew Flinders University of Sheffield
Eva Sørensen
Eva Sørensen Roskilde University
John Gastil
John Gastil Pennsylvania State University
Paul 't Hart
Paul 't Hart Utrecht University
Jacob Torfing
Jacob Torfing Roskilde University
B. Guy Peters
B. Guy Peters University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Political Science, a range of related online degrees can broaden your expertise and open new career opportunities. Programs like an online interdisciplinary studies master's degree let you combine political science with other fields, offering flexibility for diverse interests and career goals.

Another option is to specialize in the study of the past through online ma history programs. These degrees help you develop strong research and analytical skills, which are highly valued in education, policy analysis, journalism, and more.

If you're looking to boost your credentials quickly, consider fastest certifications to get. These certifications can provide targeted training for specific roles in public administration, paralegal work, or nonprofit leadership, making them a smart choice for quick career advancement.

For those seeking affordability and speed, pursuing the cheapest fastest masters degree could be ideal. These accelerated programs provide advanced qualifications without the time or financial commitment of traditional routes, helping you reach your career goals sooner.

Best Scientists Citing Tina Nabatchi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles