World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
43
Citations
6327
World Ranking
5362
National Ranking
1827

Thomas J. Hilbish publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Hilbish sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 77 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Thomas J. Hilbish D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Hilbish sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas J. Hilbish is affiliated with the University of South Carolina in the United States. Their research primarily spans Environmental Science and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on subfields including Ecology, Genetics, and Global and Planetary Change.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
  • Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies

Hilbish's recent publications illustrate these interests. Notable papers include:

  • "Transgressive gene expression and expression plasticity under thermal stress in a stable hybrid zone" (2024), published in Molecular Ecology
  • "Integration of natural selection across the life cycle stabilizes a marine mussel hybrid zone" (2024), published in Ecology and Evolution

These works reflect a focus on hybrid zones, gene expression, and natural selection in marine mussels, connecting physiological responses to environmental stressors and evolutionary processes.

Frequent co-authors contributing to their research include:

  • L. Schwartz
  • Vanessa L. González
  • Ellen E. Strong
  • Manuela Truebano
  • Allison B. Willis

Frequent publication venues where their work appears are:

  • Molecular Ecology
  • Ecology and Evolution

The combined emphasis on aquatic invertebrate ecology and genetic diversity positions Hilbish's work at the intersection of ecological and molecular approaches to understanding marine organism adaptability and population structure.

Best Publications

  • THE GEOGRAPHY OF MARINE LARVAL DISPERSAL: COUPLING GENETICS WITH FINE-SCALE PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY

    Matthew R. Gilg;Thomas J. Hilbish

  • TEMPORAL VARIATION IN THE REPRODUCTIVE CYCLE OF MYTILUS EDULIS L. (BIVALVIA, MYTILIDAE) FROM LOCALITIES ON THE EAST COAST OF THE UNITED STATES

    Roger I. E. Newell;Thomas J. Hilbish;Richard K. Koehn;Christine J. Newell

  • Origin of the antitropical distribution pattern in marine mussels (Mytilus spp.): routes and timing of transequatorial migration

    Thomas J. Hilbish;A. Mullinax;Sarah Ingrid Dolven;Axel Meyer

  • Response of intertidal populations to climate: Effects of extreme events versus long term change

    David S. Wethey;Sarah A. Woodin;Thomas J. Hilbish;Sierra J. Jones

  • Evolutionary relationships among the male and female mitochondrial DNA lineages in the Mytilus edulis species complex.

    P D Rawson;T J Hilbish

  • PCR-based nuclear markers identify alien blue mussel (Mytilus spp.) genotypes on the west coast of Canada

    Daniel D. Heath;Paul D. Rawson;Thomas J. Hilbish

  • Evidence for intragenic recombination within a novel genetic marker that distinguishes mussels in the Mytilus edulis species complex.

    Paul D Rawson;Karen L Joyner;Keith Meetze;Thomas J Hilbish

  • Climate change, species distribution models, and physiological performance metrics: predicting when biogeographic models are likely to fail

    Sarah A. Woodin;Thomas J. Hilbish;Brian Helmuth;Sierra J. Jones

  • Mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene sequences support an Asian origin for the Portuguese oyster Crassostrea angulata

    D. Ó Foighil;P. M. Gaffney;A. E. Wilbur;T. J. Hilbish

  • ECOLOGICAL GENETICS IN THE NORTH ATLANTIC: ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENTS AND ADAPTATION AT SPECIFIC LOCI

    Paul S. Schmidt;Ester A. SerrÃo;Gareth A. Pearson;Cynthia Riginos

  • THE PHYSIOLOGICAL BASIS OF NATURAL SELECTION AT THE LAP LOCUS.

    Thomas J. Hilbish;Richard K. Koehn

  • Hybridization between the blue mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis and M. trossulus along the Pacific coast of North America: evidence for limited introgression

    P. D. Rawson;V. Agrawal;T. J. Hilbish

  • Distribution of Mytilus edulis, M. galloprovincialis, and their hybrids in open-coast populations of mussels in southwestern England

    T. J. Hilbish;E. W. Carson;J. R. Plante;L. A. Weaver

  • Population genetics of marine species: the interaction of natural selection and historically differentiated populations

    Thomas J. Hilbish

  • Growth trajectories of shell and soft tissue in bivalves: Seasonal variation in Mytilus edulis L.

    Thomas J. Hilbish

  • The Adaptive Importance of Genetic Variation

    Richard K. Koehn;Thomas J. Hilbish

  • ASYMMETRIC INTROGRESSION OF MITOCHONDRIAL DNA AMONG EUROPEAN POPULATIONS OF BLUE MUSSELS (MYTILUS SPP.).

    Paul D. Rawson;Thomas J. Hilbish

  • Trans-Pacific range extension by rafting is inferred for the flat oyster Ostrea chilensis.

    Diarmaid G Foighil;Bruce A. Marshall;Thomas J. Hilbish;Mario A. Pino

  • The Effects of Natural Hybridization on the Regulation of Doubly Uniparental mtDNA Inheritance in Blue Mussels (Mytilus spp.)

    Paul D. Rawson;Carol L. Secor;Thomas J. Hilbish

  • Dominance in physiological phenotypes and fitness at an enzyme locus.

    Thomas J. Hilbish;Richard K. Koehn

  • GENETICS OF PHYSIOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION WITHIN THE MARINE MUSSEL GENUS MYTILUS.

    Thomas J. Hilbish;Brian L. Bayne;Amanda Day

  • GENOTYPE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION FOR JUVENILE GROWTH IN THE HARD CLAM MERCENARIA MERCENARIA (L.).

    Paul D. Rawson;Thomas J. Hilbish

  • Differences in mitochondrial 16S ribosomal gene sequences allow discrimination among American [Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin)] and Asian [C. gigas (Thunberg) C. ariakensis Wakiya] oyster species

    Diarmaid Ó Foighil;Patrick M. Gaffney;Thomas J. Hilbish

Frequent Co-Authors

David S. Wethey
David S. Wethey University of South Carolina
Daniel D. Heath
Daniel D. Heath University of Windsor
Fernando P. Lima
Fernando P. Lima University of Porto
Richard K. Koehn
Richard K. Koehn University of Utah
Brian Helmuth
Brian Helmuth Northeastern University
Emily Carrington
Emily Carrington University of Washington
Sarah A. Woodin
Sarah A. Woodin University of South Carolina
Jan A. Pechenik
Jan A. Pechenik Tufts University
Patrick M. Gaffney
Patrick M. Gaffney Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
Mark W. Denny
Mark W. Denny Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution opens doors to diverse career pathways both inside and outside traditional research roles. If your interests overlap with human behavior, policy, or mental health, there are many related online degree options that could broaden your expertise and employability.

For those curious about the intersection of science and law, explore what can i do with a masters in forensic psychology to learn about careers bridging ecological studies and the justice system. If your passion lies in working with youth or communities, specialized programs such as child psychology masters programs online can provide skills for educational or counseling roles.

Those seeking to make an impact through direct support roles may benefit from counseling masters programs online, which equip graduates to guide individuals or communities through change—skills in demand among conservation groups and NGOs. For a clinical perspective, discover the best online clinical psychology programs to potentially combine your ecological knowledge with mental health expertise.

These flexible online pathways can strategically supplement your background, preparing you for interdisciplinary careers that draw on both ecological science and human behavior.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas J. Hilbish

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles