World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
5705
World Ranking
10770
National Ranking
675

Sue Cobb publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sue Cobb sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 125 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Sue Cobb D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sue Cobb sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sue Cobb is a researcher affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. Their work primarily focuses on computer science, with emphases on social psychology, computer vision and pattern recognition, cognitive neuroscience, human-computer interaction, and demography. The research portfolio is composed of 14 publications in computer science and includes significant contributions in subfields such as social psychology, computer vision, and cognitive neuroscience.

Their research covers a range of main topics, notably virtual reality applications and impacts, technology use by older adults, occupational health and safety research, human-automation interaction and safety, musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation, autism spectrum disorder research, and augmented reality applications.

Frequent coauthors in their research include Brendan Ryan, Pepita Barnard, Liz Dowthwaite, Nils Jäger, and Ann-Marie Hughes. These collaborations reflect a sustained engagement with peers across overlapping research themes.

They have published in several respected academic venues, including:

  • Safety Science
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
  • ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • PRESENCE Virtual and Augmented Reality
  • Computers & Education X Reality

Selected recent papers demonstrate the scope and focus of their research:

  • How are Autistic People Involved in the Design of Extended Reality Technologies? A Systematic Literature Review, 2023, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
  • Factors Influencing Engagement in Hybrid Virtual and Augmented Reality, 2023, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • Presence and Communication in Hybrid Virtual and Augmented Reality Environments, 2021, PRESENCE Virtual and Augmented Reality
  • Using expert perspectives to explore factors affecting choice of methods in safety analysis, 2021, Safety Science
  • Programming for generalization: Confronting known challenges in the design of virtual reality interventions for autistic users, 2023, Computers & Education X Reality

Best Publications

  • Virtual reality induced symptoms and effects (VRISE): Comparison of head mounted display (HMD), desktop and projection display systems

    Sarah Sharples;Sue Cobb;Amanda Moody;John R. Wilson

  • Virtual Reality-Induced Symptoms and Effects (VRISE)

    Sue V. G. Cobb;Sarah Nichols;Amanda Ramsey;John R. Wilson

  • State-of-the-art of virtual reality technologies for children on the autism spectrum

    Sarah Parsons;Sue Cobb

  • Classroom collaboration in the design of tangible interfaces for storytelling

    Danae Stanton;Victor Bayon;Helen Neale;Ahmed Ghali

  • Measurement of postural stability before and after immersion in a virtual environment.

    Susan Valerie Gray Cobb

  • Virtual reality and rapid prototyping

    I. Gibson;D. Brown;S. Cobb;R. Eastgate

  • Technology and applications for collaborative learning in virtual reality

    Scott W. Greenwald;Alexander Kulik;André Kunert;Stephan Beck

  • Development of social skills amongst adults with Asperger's Syndrome using virtual environments: the 'AS Interactive' project

    S Parsons;L Beardon;H R Neale;G Reynard

  • Applied virtual environments to support learning of social interaction skills in users with Asperger's Syndrome

    Sue Cobb;Luke Beardon;Richard M. Eastgate;Tony Glover

  • Modified virtual reality technology for treatment of amblyopia.

    R M Eastgate;G D Griffiths;P E Waddingham;P E Waddingham;A D Moody

  • Randomised controlled trial of video clips and interactive games to improve vision in children with amblyopia using the I-BiT system

    Nicola Herbison;Daisy MacKeith;Anthony Vivian;Jon Purdy

  • The Heat is On: Exploring User Behaviour in a Multisensory Virtual Environment for Fire Evacuation

    Emily Shaw;Tessa Roper;Tommy Nilsson;Glyn Lawson

  • Key lessons for the design and integration of virtual environments in secondary science

    Joanna K. Crosier;Sue Cobb;John R. Wilson

  • Preliminary results from the use of the novel Interactive binocular treatment (I-BiT) system, in the treatment of strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia.

    P E Waddingham;T K H Butler;S V Cobb;A D R Moody

  • Experimental Comparison of Virtual Reality with Traditional Teaching Methods for Teaching Radioactivity

    Joanna K. Crosier;Sue V. G. Cobb;John R. Wilson

  • Development and Evaluation of the Virtual City

    David J. Brown;Helen Neale;Sue Cobb;Hugh Reynolds

  • Aparato de visualización ocular para el tratamiento de enfermedades oculares

    Smart Paula;Cobb Sue;Moody Amanda;Eastgate Richard

  • Validity of a Virtual Environment for Stroke Rehabilitation

    Judi A. Edmans;John R.F. Gladman;Sue Cobb;Alan Sunderland

  • Virtual environments for social skills training: the importance of scaffolding in practice

    Steven J. Kerr;Helen R. Neale;Sue V. G. Cobb

  • The AS interactive project: single-user and collaborative virtual environments for people with high-functioning autistic spectrum disorders

    Anja Rutten;Sue Cobb;Helen Neale;Steven Kerr

  • Structured Evaluation of Virtual Environments for Special-Needs Education

    H. R. Neale;D. J. Brown;S. V. G. Cobb;J. R. Wilson

Frequent Co-Authors

John R. Wilson
John R. Wilson University of Nottingham
Tony P. Pridmore
Tony P. Pridmore University of Nottingham
Steve Benford
Steve Benford University of Nottingham
Peter Mitchell
Peter Mitchell University of Nottingham
Xu Sun
Xu Sun Peking University
Ian Gibson
Ian Gibson University of Twente
Massimo Zancanaro
Massimo Zancanaro University of Trento
Claire O'Malley
Claire O'Malley Teesside University
Allison Druin
Allison Druin University of Maryland, College Park
David D. Clarke
David D. Clarke University of Nottingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Computer Science lays the foundation for many in-demand and rewarding career paths. If you’re interested in exploring fields that complement or expand upon a CS background, several related online degree options are available. Many of these can be completed fully online, making them accessible and flexible for working students or those seeking affordable alternatives.

For example, an environmental engineering degree can open doors to careers tackling global environmental challenges using technology. If your interests are more focused on design, manufacturing, or robotics, pursuing an online degree in mechanical engineering provides a strong technical foundation with broad applications.

Those fascinated by the fundamental laws of the universe may consider an online theoretical physics degree to dive deeper into advanced scientific problem-solving. Additionally, professionals seeking to enter the rapidly growing field of big data and analytics can opt for the cheapest data science degree programs, which blend computing, statistics, and business know-how.

Each pathway offers distinct specializations and career possibilities, helping you shape a future that aligns with your interests and the ever-evolving tech industry.

Best Scientists Citing Sue Cobb

Trending Scientists