World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stuart David Michael Thomas

Stuart David Michael Thomas

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
40
Citations
5457
World Ranking
5429
National Ranking
393

Stuart David Michael Thomas publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart David Michael Thomas sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 153 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Stuart David Michael Thomas D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart David Michael Thomas sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Psychiatry
  • Mental illness
  • Mental health

Stuart David Michael Thomas mostly deals with Psychiatry, Injury prevention, Suicide prevention, Human factors and ergonomics and Clinical psychology. His study in the field of Mental health and Mental illness also crosses realms of Sexual abuse, Child abuse and Child sexual abuse. His Mental health study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Reliability, Sample, Lifetime prevalence and Diagnosis of schizophrenia.

His work on Mentally ill as part of his general Mental illness study is frequently connected to Victimisation, Sex offense and Grounded theory, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science. Many of his research projects under Sexual abuse are closely connected to Personality disorders, Psychopathology and Anxiety disorder with Personality disorders, Psychopathology and Anxiety disorder, tying the diverse disciplines of science together. Stuart David Michael Thomas integrates many fields, such as Clinical psychology and Risk factor, in his works.

His most cited work include:

  • Psychopathology in a large cohort of sexually abused children followed up to 43 years (306 citations)
  • Schizophrenia and Other Psychotic Disorders in a Cohort of Sexually Abused Children (166 citations)
  • Displacement and health. (104 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Stuart David Michael Thomas focuses on Psychiatry, Mental health, Clinical psychology, Mental illness and Suicide prevention. In his works, Stuart David Michael Thomas performs multidisciplinary study on Psychiatry and Victimisation. His work carried out in the field of Mental health brings together such families of science as Nursing, Public health and Public relations.

His study in Clinical psychology is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Substance abuse and Personality, Psychopathy. His research in Suicide prevention intersects with topics in Injury prevention and Human factors and ergonomics. His work on Homicide as part of general Injury prevention study is frequently linked to Occupational safety and health, bridging the gap between disciplines.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Psychiatry (66.90%)
  • Mental health (60.69%)
  • Clinical psychology (31.72%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?

  • Mental health (60.69%)
  • Mental illness (33.79%)
  • Psychiatry (66.90%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Mental health, Mental illness, Psychiatry, Clinical psychology and Use of force. His Mental health research includes themes of Inpatient units, Medical emergency, Public relations and Medical education. His Mental illness study combines topics in areas such as Psychological intervention and Association.

His work on Intellectual disability as part of general Psychiatry study is frequently connected to Victimisation, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them. His Victimisation study focuses on Suicide prevention, Injury prevention and Human factors and ergonomics. His research integrates issues of Risk factor and Internalised stigma in his study of Clinical psychology.

Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Estimating the risk of crime and victimisation in people with intellectual disability: a data-linkage study (17 citations)
  • Estimating the risk of crime and victimisation in people with intellectual disability: a data-linkage study (17 citations)
  • The risks, needs and stages of recovery of a complete forensic patient cohort in an Australian state. (14 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Mental illness
  • Mental health
  • Psychiatry

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Mental health, Mental illness, Clinical psychology, Procedural justice and Internalised stigma. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Criminal history, Family medicine, Criminal justice, Sample and Cohort. His Mental illness study frequently draws connections to other fields, such as Social psychology.

In general Social psychology, his work in Legal psychology is often linked to Redress and Use of force linking many areas of study. Stuart David Michael Thomas connects Clinical psychology with Positive perception in his study.

Best Publications

  • Psychopathology in a large cohort of sexually abused children followed up to 43 years

    Margaret C. Cutajar;Paul E. Mullen;James R. P. Ogloff;Stuart D. Thomas

  • Schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders in a cohort of sexually abused children.

    Margaret C. Cutajar;Paul E. Mullen;James R. P. Ogloff;Stuart D. M. Thomas

  • Displacement and health.

    Samantha L Thomas;Stuart David Michael Thomas

  • Youth gang affiliation, violence, and criminal activities: A review of motivational, risk, and protective factors

    Kate O'Brien;Michael David Daffern;Chi Meng Chu;Chi Meng Chu;Stuart David Michael Thomas;Stuart David Michael Thomas

  • A case-linkage study of crime victimisation in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders over a period of deinstitutionalisation

    Tamsin Bernice Short;Stuart David Michael Thomas;Stuart David Michael Thomas;Stefan Luebbers;Paul Edward Mullen

  • The reliability and validity of the forensic Camberwell Assessment of Need (CANFOR): a needs assessment for forensic mental health service users.

    Stuart D. M. Thomas;Mike Slade;Paul Mccrone;Mari-Anne Harty

  • Procedural justice in contacts with the police: testing a relational model of authority in a mixed methods study

    Irina Elliott;Stuart D. M. Thomas;James R. P. Ogloff

  • Comparing violence in schizophrenia patients with and without comorbid substance-use disorders to community controls

    Tamsin Bernice Short;Stuart David Michael Thomas;Paul Edward Mullen;James Robert Ogloff

  • Crime and victimisation in people with intellectual disability: a case linkage study

    Billy C Fogden;Stuart Dm Thomas;Stuart Dm Thomas;Stuart Dm Thomas;Michael D Daffern;James R. P Ogloff;James R. P Ogloff

  • Suicide and fatal drug overdose in child sexual abuse victims: a historical cohort study.

    Margaret C Cutajar;Paul E Mullen;James R P Ogloff;Stuart D Thomas

  • Police perceptions of their encounters with individuals experiencing mental illness: a Victorian survey

    Joel W. Godfredson;Stuart D. M. Thomas;James R. P. Ogloff;Stefan Luebbers

  • An ecological study of factors associated with rates of self-inflicted death in prisons in England and Wales

    Morven Leese;Stuart David Michael Thomas;Louisa Snow

  • The short- to medium-term predictive accuracy of static and dynamic risk assessment measures in a secure forensic hospital

    Chi Meng Chu;Stuart David Michael Thomas;James Robert Ogloff;Michael David Daffern

  • Procedural justice in contacts with the police: the perspective of victims of crime

    Irina Elliott;Stuart David Michael Thomas;James Robert Ogloff

  • Schizophrenia disorders, substance abuse and prior offending in a sequential series of 435 homicides

    Deb Bennett;James Ogloff;Paul Mullen;Stuart Thomas

  • Violence risk and gang affiliation in youth offenders: a recidivism study

    Chi Meng Chu;Michael David Daffern;Stuart David Michael Thomas;Jia Ying Lim

  • Psychiatric disorders and unmet needs in Australian police cells

    Gennady N. Baksheev;Stuart D. M. Thomas;James R. P. Ogloff

  • Harm associated with stalking victimization.

    Stuart David Michael Thomas;Rosemary Purcell;Michele Pathe;Paul Edward Mullen

  • Adolescent sexual offenders: The relationship between typology and recidivism

    Chi Meng Chu;Stuart D. M. Thomas

  • Police Discretion and Encounters With People Experiencing Mental Illness: The Significant Factors

    Joel W. Godfredson;James R.P. Ogloff;Stuart D.M. Thomas;Stefan Luebbers

  • Estimating the risk of crime and victimisation in people with intellectual disability: a data-linkage study

    Margaret Nixon;Margaret Nixon;Stuart D. M. Thomas;Stuart D. M. Thomas;Michael Daffern;James R. P. Ogloff

  • Police encounters with people with intellectual disability: prevalence, characteristics and challenges.

    Marie Henshaw;Stuart David Michael Thomas

Frequent Co-Authors

James R. P. Ogloff
James R. P. Ogloff Swinburne University of Technology
Michael David Daffern
Michael David Daffern Swinburne University of Technology
Graham Thornicroft
Graham Thornicroft King's College London
Morven Leese
Morven Leese King's College London
Paul E. Mullen
Paul E. Mullen Monash University
Mike Slade
Mike Slade University of Nottingham
Jenny Shaw
Jenny Shaw University of Manchester
Samantha L. Thomas
Samantha L. Thomas Deakin University
Paul McCrone
Paul McCrone King's College London
Louis Appleby
Louis Appleby University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The online landscape for Social Sciences and Humanities degrees in the USA offers remarkable flexibility for students balancing education with life’s other commitments. Programs in psychology, social work, and marriage and family therapy are especially popular due to high demand in related careers.

Prospective students can find affordable online psychology degrees that make entering the field both practical and cost-effective. For those interested in social work, some of the easiest msw programs to get into help students start their journey with accessible admissions requirements.

Professionals seeking advanced clinical practice may consider best psyd programs, which foster careers in counseling and therapy with an emphasis on real-world skills. If you’re eager to fast-track your qualifications, accelerated online mft programs provide a quicker route to becoming a licensed marriage and family therapist.

Choosing the right online pathway depends on your goals, current situation, and desired timeline, but a flexible education is now more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Stuart David Michael Thomas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles