World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
5625
World Ranking
9849
National Ranking
4148

Raheem Beyah publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raheem Beyah sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 202 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Raheem Beyah D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raheem Beyah sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - ACM Distinguished Member
  • 2011 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Raheem Beyah is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States and has a research focus primarily within the field of Computer Science. Their scholarly contributions span various subfields, including Signal Processing, Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Software, and Control and Systems Engineering.

Themes prominent in their research include Advanced Malware Detection Techniques, Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning, Software Engineering Research, Software Testing and Debugging Techniques, Security and Verification in Computing, Software Reliability and Analysis Research, and Smart Grid Security and Resilience.

Some of their recent published papers include:

  • A Large-Scale Empirical Study on the Vulnerability of Deployed IoT Devices, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
  • Multi-Color 3D Printing via Single-Vat Grayscale Digital Light Processing, 2022, Advanced Functional Materials
  • V-Fuzz: Vulnerability Prediction-Assisted Evolutionary Fuzzing for Binary Programs, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
  • UNIFUZZ: A Holistic and Pragmatic Metrics-Driven Platform for Evaluating Fuzzers, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Raheem Beyah include Shouling Ji, Xuhong Zhang, Chenyang Lyu, Ting Wang, and Qinying Wang.

The primary venues where Raheem Beyah's work has appeared are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
  • IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
  • 2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)
  • Advanced Functional Materials

Raheem Beyah has been recognized with professional distinctions including the ACM Senior Member in 2011 and the ACM Distinguished Member in 2016.

Best Publications

  • Acing the IOC Game: Toward Automatic Discovery and Analysis of Open-Source Cyber Threat Intelligence

    Xiaojing Liao;Kan Yuan;XiaoFeng Wang;Zhou Li

  • GTID: A Technique for Physical Device and Device Type Fingerprinting

    Sakthi Vignesh Radhakrishnan;A. Selcuk Uluagac;Raheem Beyah

  • Who's in Control of Your Control System? Device Fingerprinting for Cyber-Physical Systems.

    David Formby;Preethi Srinivasan;Andrew M. Leonard;Jonathan D. Rogers

  • Rogue access point detection using temporal traffic characteristics

    R. Beyah;S. Kangude;G. Yu;B. Strickland

  • Graph Data Anonymization, De-Anonymization Attacks, and De-Anonymizability Quantification: A Survey

    Shouling Ji;Prateek Mittal;Raheem A. Beyah

  • SirenAttack: Generating Adversarial Audio for End-to-End Acoustic Systems

    Tianyu Du;Shouling Ji;Jinfeng Li;Qinchen Gu

  • Structural Data De-anonymization: Quantification, Practice, and Implications

    Shouling Ji;Weiqing Li;Mudhakar Srivatsa;Raheem Beyah

  • {MOPT}: Optimized Mutation Scheduling for Fuzzers

    Chenyang Lyu;Shouling Ji;Chao Zhang;Yuwei Li

  • SecGraph: a uniform and open-source evaluation system for graph data anonymization and de-anonymization

    Shouling Ji;Weiqing Li;Prateek Mittal;Xin Hu

  • A passive approach to wireless device fingerprinting

    Ke Gao;Cherita Corbett;Raheem Beyah

  • P3D: A parallel 3D coordinate visualization for advanced network scans

    Troy Nunnally;Penyen Chi;Kulsoom Abdullah;A. Selcuk Uluagac

  • A Passive Approach to Rogue Access Point Detection

    L. Watkins;R. Beyah;C. Corbett

  • On Your Social Network De-anonymizablity: Quantification and Large Scale Evaluation with Seed Knowledge.

    Shouling Ji;Weiqing Li;Neil Zhenqiang Gong;Prateek Mittal

  • Composite Event Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks

    C.T. Vu;R.A. Beyah;Yingshu Li

  • Visual firewall: real-time network security monitor

    C.P. Lee;J. Trost;N. Gibbs;Raheem Beyah

  • Edge Computing for the Internet of Things

    Ju Ren;Yi Pan;Andrzej Goscinski;Raheem A. Beyah

  • Sensor scheduling for p-percent coverage in wireless sensor networks

    Yingshu Li;Chunyu Ai;Zhipeng Cai;Raheem Beyah

  • Structure Based Data De-Anonymization of Social Networks and Mobility Traces

    Shouling Ji;Weiqing Li;Mudhakar Srivatsa;Jing Selena He

  • Snapshot and Continuous Data Collection in Probabilistic Wireless Sensor Networks

    Shouling Ji;Raheem Beyah;Zhipeng Cai

  • VEBEK: Virtual Energy-Based Encryption and Keying for Wireless Sensor Networks

    A Selcuk Uluagac;Raheem A Beyah;Yingshu Li;John A Copeland

  • Multi‐Color 3D Printing via Single‐Vat Grayscale Digital Light Processing

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Shouling Ji
Shouling Ji Zhejiang University
John A. Copeland
John A. Copeland Georgia Institute of Technology
Ting Wang
Ting Wang Washington University in St. Louis
Yingshu Li
Yingshu Li Georgia State University
Zhipeng Cai
Zhipeng Cai Georgia State University
Prateek Mittal
Prateek Mittal Princeton University
Xiaofeng Wang
Xiaofeng Wang Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Mudhakar Srivatsa
Mudhakar Srivatsa IBM (United States)
Yi Pan
Yi Pan Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology
Raghupathy Sivakumar
Raghupathy Sivakumar Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education can open doors to diverse and flexible career options within computer science and related fields. Many universities across the USA offer degrees that can be completed fully online, allowing students to balance their studies with work or other commitments.

Those interested in a foundational science may consider the cheapest online physics degree options, which offer affordability without compromising on quality. Students focused on data and analytics could look into the cheapest master in data science for advanced skills leading to high-demand roles.

If your interests lean toward tech infrastructure and innovation, researching electrical engineering degree online admissions can connect you to top-rated programs nationwide. Additionally, those seeking fast entry into the workforce can explore 3-month certificate programs that pay well to quickly upskill and access lucrative job opportunities.

Whether you are aiming for a comprehensive degree or a quick certification, plenty of flexible and affordable pathways can help you advance your tech career from anywhere.

Best Scientists Citing Raheem Beyah

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles