World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
51
Citations
9028
World Ranking
3869
National Ranking
1672

Steven J. Sandler publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven J. Sandler sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 112 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Steven J. Sandler D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven J. Sandler sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steven J. Sandler is affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Amherst in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on fields related to biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a significant concentration on molecular biology and genetics within these disciplines.

Their published work extensively covers topics such as DNA repair mechanisms, bacterial genetics and biotechnology, and DNA and nucleic acid chemistry. Additional areas of study include CRISPR and genetic engineering, enzyme structure and function, carcinogens and genotoxicity assessment, and amino acid enzymes and metabolism.

Key publication venues for their research include the Journal of Bacteriology, where they have contributed three papers, as well as Molecular Microbiology with two papers published. Other venues featuring their work are Nucleic Acids Research, Nature Communications, and Genetics.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Steven J. Sandler include the following:

  • Development of a single-stranded DNA-binding protein fluorescent fusion toolbox, 2020, Nucleic Acids Research
  • Interaction with single-stranded DNA-binding protein localizes ribonuclease HI to DNA replication forks and facilitates R-loop removal, 2020, Molecular Microbiology
  • Replication fork binding triggers structural changes in the PriA helicase that govern DNA replication restart in E. coli, 2023, Nature Communications
  • Escherichia coli K-12 has two distinguishable PriA-PriB replication restart pathways, 2021, Molecular Microbiology
  • An Epistasis Analysis of recA and recN in Escherichia coli K-12, 2020, Genetics

Sandler frequently collaborates with several researchers in the field, including James L. Keck, Elizabeth A. Wood, Michael M. Cox, A. Klimova, and Katarzyna Dubiel. Among these, James L. Keck is the most frequent coauthor, with five joint publications.

The scientist's research is characterized by its emphasis on DNA replication and repair processes, particularly within bacterial systems. Their investigations have included the study of single-stranded DNA-binding proteins, replication fork dynamics, and genetic pathways relevant to replication restart mechanisms in Escherichia coli.

Best Publications

  • The importance of repairing stalled replication forks

    Michael M. Cox;Myron F. Goodman;Kenneth N. Kreuzer;David J. Sherratt

  • Development of a genetic system for Geobacter sulfurreducens.

    Maddalena V. Coppi;Ching Leang;Steven J. Sandler;Derek R. Lovley

  • Biochemical and genetic characterization of PpcA, a periplasmic c-type cytochrome in Geobacter sulfurreducens.

    Jon R Lloyd;Ching Leang;Allison L Hodges Myerson;Maddalena V Coppi

  • Role of PriA in replication fork reactivation in Escherichia coli.

    Steven J. Sandler;Kenneth J. Marians

  • Homologous genetic recombination: the pieces begin to fall into place.

    Alvin J. Clark;Steven J. Sandler

  • RadA protein is an archaeal RecA protein homolog that catalyzes DNA strand exchange

    Seitz Em;Brockman Jp;Sandler Sj;Clark Aj

  • Overexpression of archaeal proteins in Escherichia coli

    Rosalind Kim;Steve J. Sandler;Stanley Goldman;Hisao Yokota

  • Physical manipulation of the Escherichia coli chromosome reveals its soft nature

    James Pelletier;Ken Halvorsen;Ken Halvorsen;Bae-Yeun Ha;Raffaella Paparcone

  • Reduced sensitivity of inducible nitric oxide synthase-deficient mice to multiple low-dose streptozotocin-induced diabetes.

    M Flodström;B Tyrberg;Decio L. Eizirik;S Sandler

  • Differential Suppression of priA2::kan Phenotypes in Escherichia coli K-12 by Mutations in priA, lexA, and dnaC

    Steven J. Sandler;Hardeep S. Samra;Alvin J. Clark

  • Measurement of SOS expression in individual Escherichia coli K-12 cells using fluorescence microscopy.

    Jesse D. McCool;Edward Long;Joseph F. Petrosino;Hilary A. Sandler

  • Multiple genetic pathways for restarting DNA replication forks in Escherichia coli K-12.

    Steven J. Sandler

  • Evolutionary Comparisons of RecA-Like Proteins Across All Major Kingdoms of Living Organisms

    Volker Brendel;Luciano Brocchieri;Steven J. Sandler;Alvin J. Clark

  • recA-Like Genes From Three Archaean Species with Putative Protein Products Similar to Rad51 and Dmcl Proteins of the Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

    Steven J. Sandler;Leslie H. Satin;Hardeep S. Samra;Alvin J. Clark

  • Replication fork assembly at recombination intermediates is required for bacterial growth

    Joing Liu;Liewei Xu;Steven J. Sandler;Kenneth J. Marians

  • Structure of the SSB–DNA polymerase III interface and its role in DNA replication

    Aimee H Marceau;Soon Bahng;Shawn C Massoni;Nicholas P George

  • IL-1 receptor antagonist inhibits recurrence of disease after syngeneic pancreatic islet transplantation to spontaneously diabetic non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice

    J O Sandberg;Decio L. Eizirik;S Sandler

  • Long-term effects of cyclosporin A on cultured mouse pancreatic islets

    A. Andersson;H. Borg;A. Hallberg;C. Hellerström

  • Localization of RecA in Escherichia coli K‐12 using RecA–GFP

    Nicholas Renzette;Nathan Gumlaw;Jared T. Nordman;Marlee Krieger

  • Interleukin-1 beta increases the activity of superoxide dismutase in rat pancreatic islets.

    L A Borg;E Cagliero;S Sandler;Nils Welsh

Frequent Co-Authors

Decio L. Eizirik
Decio L. Eizirik Université Libre de Bruxelles
Alvin J. Clark
Alvin J. Clark University of Arizona
Claes Hellerström
Claes Hellerström Uppsala University
Klaus Bendtzen
Klaus Bendtzen Rigshospitalet
Kenneth J. Marians
Kenneth J. Marians Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Michael M. Cox
Michael M. Cox University of Wisconsin–Madison
Olle Korsgren
Olle Korsgren Uppsala University
Derek R. Lovley
Derek R. Lovley University of Massachusetts Amherst
Taekjip Ha
Taekjip Ha Johns Hopkins University
Sigurd Lenzen
Sigurd Lenzen Hannover Medical School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring genetics can open doors to a variety of interdisciplinary careers in healthcare, biomedical sciences, and research. For those interested in combining genetics with nursing, pursuing a nursing program no teas requirement streamlines admission for aspiring nurses, letting you focus more on coursework rather than entrance exams.

If healthcare leadership interests you, consider the cheapest online mha options to gain advanced management skills affordably. For those seeking a quicker entry point into the workforce, a 9 month lpn program offers a fast-track route to start a practical nursing career with flexible online learning.

Professionals already in nursing or a science field may also look to complete a phd in nursing for advanced research opportunities and teaching roles. Whether you choose a direct patient-care path or a research-oriented route, online programs make it easier than ever to further your education in areas complementary to genetics.

Best Scientists Citing Steven J. Sandler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles