World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
6173
World Ranking
10423
National Ranking
5473

Stephen M. Auerbach publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen M. Auerbach sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 70 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stephen M. Auerbach D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen M. Auerbach sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1989 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Stephen M. Auerbach is affiliated with Virginia Commonwealth University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within the social sciences and humanities, with a particular focus on law, history, sociology, and economics. The main fields of study include Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities, and Economics, Econometrics and Finance. Subfields specifically addressed in their work comprise Law, Sociology and Political Science, History, Anthropology, and Economics and Econometrics.

The research topics that feature prominently in Auerbach's work encompass:

  • Law in Society and Culture
  • Historical Economic and Social Studies
  • Colonialism, slavery, and trade
  • Australian History and Society
  • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
  • Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies
  • Caribbean history, culture, and politics

Frequent publication venues for this researcher include:

  • The English Historical Review
  • Cambridge University Press eBooks
  • History Compass
  • Contraception
  • Journal of Colonialism and Colonial History

Recent papers authored by Stephen M. Auerbach cover a variety of interdisciplinary topics, published from 2021 to 2025, include:

  • "Of Rights and Riots: Indenture and (Mis)Rule in the Late Nineteenth-Century British Caribbean", 2022, The English Historical Review
  • "Index", 2021, Cambridge University Press eBooks
  • "Recent work on indenture in the British World", 2024, History Compass
  • "PUBLIC SUPPORT FOR REPORTING AND PUNISHING PEOPLE WHO USE ALCOHOL OR DRUGS WHILE PREGNANT", 2024, Contraception
  • "The Driver's Story: Labor and Power in the World of Atlantic Slavery by Randy Browne (review)", 2025, Journal of Colonialism and Colonial History

Their book publications include titles from leading academic presses such as Cambridge University Press and University of Nottingham. Notable books are:

  • "Armed with Sword and Scales", Cambridge University Press, 2021
  • "The Overseer State", Cambridge University Press, 2025
  • "Armed with Sword and Scales: Law, Culture, and Local Courtrooms in London, 1860-1913", University of Nottingham, 2021

Stephen M. Auerbach has collaborated with several frequent co-authors, including SCM Roberts, LJ Ralph, Shelly Kaller, Rosalyn Schroeder, and M. Antonia Biggs.

Among their recognitions, Auerbach was named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1989.

Best Publications

  • Optimal matches of patient preferences for information, decision-making and interpersonal behavior: evidence, models and interventions.

    Donald J. Kiesler;Stephen M. Auerbach

  • Trait-state anxiety and adjustment to surgery.

    Stephen M. Auerbach

  • Emotional reactions to surgery.

    Charles D. Spielberger;Stephen M. Auerbach;Allen P. Wadsworth;Thomas M. Dunn

  • Depression, pain, exposure to stressful life events, and long-term outcomes in temporomandibular disorder patients

    Stephen M. Auerbach;Daniel M. Laskin;Lisa Maria E. Frantsve;Tamara Orr

  • Optimism, Satisfaction With Needs Met, Interpersonal Perceptions of the Healthcare Team, and Emotional Distress in Patients’ Family Members During Critical Care Hospitalization

    Stephen M. Auerbach;Donald J. Kiesler;Jennifer Wartella;Sarah Rausch

  • Anxiety, locus of control, type of preparatory information, and adjustment to dental surgery.

    Stephen M. Auerbach;Philip C. Kendall;Henry F. Cuttler;Neal R. Levitt

  • Crisis Intervention: A Review of Outcome Research

    Stephen M. Auerbach;Peter R. Kilmann

  • The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: a systematic evaluation.

    Philip C. Kendall;A. J. Finch Jr.;Stephen M. Auerbach;James F. Hooke

  • Cognitive, affective, and behavioral effects of reminiscence group therapy on demented elderly.

    A N Goldwasser;S M Auerbach;S W Harkins

  • Stress management and coping research in the health care setting: An overview and methodological commentary.

    Stephen M. Auerbach

  • Anxiety, information, interpersonal impacts, and adjustment to a stressful health care situation.

    Stephen M. Auerbach;Michael F. Martelli;Louis G. Mercuri

  • Stress management in the health care setting: matching interventions with patient coping styles.

    Michael F. Martelli;Stephen M. Auerbach;John Alexander;Louis G. Mercuri

  • Effects of a Single Session of Large-Group Meditation and Progressive Muscle Relaxation Training on Stress Reduction, Reactivity, and Recovery

    Sarah M. Rausch;Sandra E. Gramling;Stephen M. Auerbach

  • Integrating measurement of control and affiliation in studies of physician-patient interaction: the interpersonal circumplex.

    Donald J Kiesler;Stephen M Auerbach

  • Adjustment to the stress of simulated captivity: effects of emotion-focused versus problem-focused preparation on hostages differing in locus of control.

    Thomas Strentz;Stephen M. Auerbach

  • Do Patients Want Control over their Own Health Care? A Review of Measures, Findings, and Research Issues

    Stephen M. Auerbach

  • General job stress and job-specific stress in juvenile correctional officers

    Stephen M Auerbach;Ben G Quick;Phillip O Pegg

  • Providers' roles in enhancing patients' adherence to pain self management

    Lindsey Dorflinger;Robert D Kerns;Stephen M Auerbach

  • Relation of diabetic patients' health-related control appraisals and physician-patient interpersonal impacts to patients' metabolic control and satisfaction with treatment.

    Stephen M Auerbach;John N Clore;Donald J Kiesler;Tamara Orr

  • Stress Management: Psychological Foundations

    Stephen M. Auerbach;Sandra E. Gramling

  • Psychological factors in recurrent genital herpes infection: Stress, coping style, social support, emotional dysfunction, and symptom recurrence

    Paul S. Silver;Stephen M. Auerbach;Nahum Vishniavcky;Lisa G. Kaplowitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald J. Kiesler
Donald J. Kiesler Virginia Commonwealth University
Bruce Rybarczyk
Bruce Rybarczyk Virginia Commonwealth University
Philip C. Kendall
Philip C. Kendall Temple University
Jack D. Edinger
Jack D. Edinger Duke University
Charles D. Spielberger
Charles D. Spielberger University of South Florida
Robert D. Kerns
Robert D. Kerns Yale University
Albert D. Farrell
Albert D. Farrell Virginia Commonwealth University
Rao R Ivatury
Rao R Ivatury Virginia Commonwealth University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens up diverse online study options and career pathways. Many students transition from psychology programs into roles such as school counselor, therapist, or mental health specialist. Online degrees offer flexibility, allowing you to study at your own pace while gaining essential skills for these rewarding careers.

If you're interested in becoming a school counselor, each state has its own specific education and certification requirements. For instance, review the Utah school counselor education requirements to understand the state's particular expectations. Similarly, you can learn about the process for other states by exploring what it takes for how to become a school counselor in Vermont.

Looking towards the East Coast, understanding Virginia school counselor certification requirements provides insights into the coursework, exams, and practical experience necessary. Meanwhile, those considering work in the Pacific Northwest should investigate how to become a school counselor in Washington for more details.

Whether you select counseling or another psychology-related career, understanding your state’s requirements is essential for a successful pathway. Online degrees can help you meet these requirements while balancing work and family commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen M. Auerbach

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles