World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 86 14162 13336 7173 6639 677 26244

Michael V. Knopp publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael V. Knopp between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael V. Knopp published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 19.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 56 publications in 2016. 15 of the 715 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 56. Peak 56 publications in 2016. 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 15 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 18 publications 1995: 15 publications 1996: 33 publications 1997: 33 publications 1998: 25 publications 1999: 27 publications 2000: 20 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 31 publications 2008: 32 publications 2009: 28 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 25 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 26 publications 2016: 56 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 28 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 7 publications
1989 2025

715 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael V. Knopp: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 2
1990 0
1991 3
1992 15
1993 9
1994 18
1995 15
1996 33
1997 33
1998 25
1999 27
2000 20
2001 9
2002 12
2003 17
2004 9
2005 14
2006 17
2007 31
2008 32
2009 28
2010 24
2011 25
2012 24
2013 21
2014 15
2015 26
2016 56
2017 27
2018 24
2019 28
2020 17
2021 24
2022 7
2023 13
2024 8
2025 7
Total 715
Download as CSV

Michael V. Knopp publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael V. Knopp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 661–680 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 677 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340 677
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael V. Knopp D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael V. Knopp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960 86
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael V. Knopp is affiliated with The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of medicine with notable contributions across 127 publications. The main subfields of study include Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging; Surgery; Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine; Oncology; and Biomedical Engineering.

The scientist's work addresses several key topics, including:

  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
  • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
  • Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques

Michael V. Knopp has published extensively in a range of respected venues. The most frequent publication journals are:

  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (7 publications)
  • Osteoarthritis and Cartilage (5 publications)
  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics (3 publications)
  • Blood (2 publications)
  • Annals of Oncology (2 publications)

Their recent papers demonstrate a focus on oncology, imaging, and clinical trials. Selected papers include:

  • Phase 3 Trial of Cabozantinib to Treat Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors, 2024, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Prognostic value of interim FDG-PET in diffuse large cell lymphoma: results from the CALGB 50303 Clinical Trial, 2020, Blood
  • Alliance A071401: Phase II Trial of Focal Adhesion Kinase Inhibition in Meningiomas With Somatic NF2 Mutations, 2022, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • LBA53 Alliance A021602: Phase III, double-blinded study of cabozantinib versus placebo for advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NET) after progression on prior therapy (CABINET), 2023, Annals of Oncology
  • Eccentric rehabilitation induces white matter plasticity and sensorimotor recovery in chronic spinal cord injury, 2021, Experimental Neurology

Frequent co-authors working closely with Michael V. Knopp include:

  • Heiko Schöder
  • Chadwick Wright
  • Richard Lartey
  • Brendan Eck
  • Kurt P. Spindler

These collaborations indicate active engagement with colleagues across highly specialized domains within medicine and oncology research.

Best Publications

  • Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols.

    Paul S. Tofts;Gunnar Brix;David L. Buckley;Jeffrey L. Evelhoch

  • Consensus recommendations for a standardized Brain Tumor Imaging Protocol in clinical trials

    Benjamin M. Ellingson;Martin Bendszus;Martin Bendszus;Jerrold Boxerman;Daniel Barboriak

  • Phase II Trial of Sorafenib in Metastatic Thyroid Cancer

    Richard T. Kloos;Matthew D. Ringel;Michael V. Knopp;Nathan C. Hall

  • The assessment of antiangiogenic and antivascular therapies in early-stage clinical trials using magnetic resonance imaging: issues and recommendations

    Martin O Leach;K Brindle;J Evelhoch;John R Griffiths

  • Functional tumor imaging with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

    Peter L. Choyke;Andrew J. Dwyer;Michael V. Knopp

  • Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors.

    M.V. Knopp;E. Weiss;H.P. Sinn;J. Mattern

  • Phase II Clinical Trial of Sorafenib in Metastatic Medullary Thyroid Cancer

    Elaine T. Lam;Matthew D. Ringel;Richard T. Kloos;Thomas W. Prior

  • Pharmacokinetic mapping of the breast: a new method for dynamic MR mammography

    U Hoffmann;G Brix;M V Knopp;T Hess

  • Normal and abnormal pulmonary ventilation: visualization at hyperpolarized He-3 MR imaging.

    H U Kauczor;D Hofmann;K F Kreitner;H Nilgens

  • US Intergroup Trial of Response-Adapted Therapy for Stage III to IV Hodgkin Lymphoma Using Early Interim Fluorodeoxyglucose–Positron Emission Tomography Imaging: Southwest Oncology Group S0816

    Oliver W. Press;Oliver W. Press;Hongli Li;Heiko Schöder;David J. Straus

  • MR imaging of tumor microcirculation: Promise for the new millenium

    June S. Taylor;June S. Taylor;Paul S. Tofts;Ruediger Port;Jeffrey L. Evelhoch

  • Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging with hyperpolarised helium-3

    M Ebert;T Grossmann;W Heil;E.W Otten

  • A comprehensive overview of radioguided surgery using gamma detection probe technology

    Stephen P Povoski;Ryan L Neff;Cathy M Mojzisik;David M O'Malley

  • Sensorimotor cortex and supplementary motor area changes in schizophrenia. A study with functional magnetic resonance imaging.

    J. Schröder;F. Wenz;L. R. Schad;K. Baudendistel

  • Imaging Cortical Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis With Ultra–High-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    David Pitt;Aaron Boster;Wei Pei;Eric Wohleb

  • Non-invasive vascular imaging: assessing tumour vascularity.

    S. Delorme;M. V. Knopp

  • Creatine deficiency syndrome caused by guanidinoacetate methyltransferase deficiency: Diagnostic tools for a new inborn error of metabolism

    A. Schulze;T. Hess;R. Wevers;E. Mayatepek

  • Uterine Cervical Carcinoma: Comparison of Standard and Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Time-Intensity Curves for Assessment of Tumor Angiogenesis and Patient Survival

    H. Hawighorst;P. G. Knapstein;M. V. Knopp;W. Weikel

  • Angiogenic activity of cervical carcinoma: assessment by functional magnetic resonance imaging-based parameters and a histomorphological approach in correlation with disease outcome.

    H Hawighorst;W Weikel;P G Knapstein;M V Knopp

  • Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oncology.

    Knopp Mv;Giesel Fl;Marcos H;von Tengg-Kobligk H

Frequent Co-Authors

Marco Essig
Marco Essig University of Manitoba
Jürgen Debus
Jürgen Debus University Hospital Heidelberg
Stefan O. Schoenberg
Stefan O. Schoenberg Heidelberg University
Johannes Pantel
Johannes Pantel Goethe University Frankfurt
Peter L. Choyke
Peter L. Choyke National Institutes of Health
Frederik L. Giesel
Frederik L. Giesel University Hospital Heidelberg
Uwe Haberkorn
Uwe Haberkorn Heidelberg University
Ali R. Rezai
Ali R. Rezai West Virginia University
Charles L. Shapiro
Charles L. Shapiro Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Heiko Schöder
Heiko Schöder Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Medicine opens the door to a variety of related online degrees and healthcare pathways. One popular choice is pursuing an online BS in nutrition, which equips students with the foundational knowledge needed for roles in dietetics, nutrition consulting, and health promotion.

For those interested in healthcare administration, accredited online programs are vital. Explore reputable online MHA programs CAHME accredited to ensure the highest standards in healthcare leadership and management education.

Registered nurses looking to further their education often consider BSN completion programs. Many ask, does RN to BSN require clinicals? Some online RN to BSN programs can be completed fully online, allowing working nurses to advance their qualifications with minimal disruption.

Advanced nursing professionals may also want to consider the shortest online DNP program options, which provide a fast track to a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree and open doors to leadership and specialized roles.

Best Scientists Citing Michael V. Knopp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles