What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Organic chemistry
- Enzyme
- Biochemistry
Stephen Hanessian spends much of his time researching Stereochemistry, Organic chemistry, Total synthesis, Bicyclic molecule and Combinatorial chemistry.
His Stereochemistry research incorporates elements of Amino acid, Enzyme, Peptidomimetic, Chemical synthesis and Stereoselectivity.
His Stereoselectivity study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Medicinal chemistry and Addition reaction.
His Organic chemistry study is mostly concerned with Lactone, Reagent, Catalysis, Alkyl and Acetal.
His work focuses on many connections between Total synthesis and other disciplines, such as Absolute configuration, that overlap with his field of interest in Natural product.
Stephen Hanessian focuses mostly in the field of Bicyclic molecule, narrowing it down to topics relating to Alkylation and, in certain cases, Enantiomer, Enantioselective synthesis and Reactivity.
His most cited work include:
- Design and synthesis of conformationally constrained amino acids as versatile scaffolds and peptide mimetics (503 citations)
- Regioselective manipulation of hydroxyl groups via organotin derivatives (488 citations)
- The Preparation and Synthetic Utility of tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl Ethers (381 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Stereochemistry, Organic chemistry, Total synthesis, Combinatorial chemistry and Bicyclic molecule are his primary areas of study.
He is interested in Intramolecular force, which is a field of Stereochemistry.
His study in Organic chemistry concentrates on Alkyl, Catalysis, Reagent and Lactone.
His work deals with themes such as Lactam and Crystal structure, which intersect with Bicyclic molecule.
Crystal structure is closely attributed to Molecule in his study.
He most often published in these fields:
- Stereochemistry (53.79%)
- Organic chemistry (28.03%)
- Total synthesis (14.65%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2008-2021)?
- Stereochemistry (53.79%)
- Total synthesis (14.65%)
- Organic chemistry (28.03%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Stephen Hanessian mostly deals with Stereochemistry, Total synthesis, Organic chemistry, Combinatorial chemistry and Catalysis.
Stephen Hanessian mostly deals with Lactone in his studies of Stereochemistry.
His research in Total synthesis intersects with topics in Molecule, Aliskiren, Enantiopure drug and Pactamycin.
All of his Organic chemistry and Yield and Allylic rearrangement investigations are sub-components of the entire Organic chemistry study.
His studies in Combinatorial chemistry integrate themes in fields like Reagent and In vitro.
Stephen Hanessian focuses mostly in the field of Catalysis, narrowing it down to matters related to Medicinal chemistry and, in some cases, Alkyl.
Between 2008 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Synthetic Strategies toward Natural Products Containing Contiguous Stereogenic Quaternary Carbon Atoms. (119 citations)
- Total synthesis of pactamycin. (60 citations)
- Recent Progress in the Chemistry of Daphniphyllum Alkaloids (49 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Organic chemistry
- Enzyme
- Biochemistry
His scientific interests lie mostly in Stereochemistry, Total synthesis, Organic chemistry, Aminoglycoside and Antibiotics.
His Stereochemistry research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Antiprotozoal, Stereoisomerism, Antibacterial activity, Pactamycin and Chemical synthesis.
His study in Total synthesis is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Stereocenter, Lactone, Lewis acids and bases, Enantiopure drug and Stereoselectivity.
The Stereoselectivity study which covers Reagent that intersects with Combinatorial chemistry.
His Organic chemistry research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Perspective and Drug.
The concepts of his Aminoglycoside study are interwoven with issues in Ether, A-site, Amphiphile and Neomycin.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
