World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 63 3154 2906 338 320 177 12024

Robert T Woods publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert T Woods between 1977 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert T Woods published across 45 years, from 1977 to 2021, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2015. 6 of the 201 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2015. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 3 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 4 publications
1977 2021

201 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert T Woods: publications per year, 1977 to 2021
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 0
1979 2
1980 1
1981 1
1982 2
1983 3
1984 0
1985 1
1986 3
1987 2
1988 0
1989 0
1990 3
1991 1
1992 2
1993 0
1994 1
1995 2
1996 0
1997 1
1998 1
1999 1
2000 3
2001 8
2002 3
2003 7
2004 5
2005 3
2006 3
2007 3
2008 14
2009 4
2010 11
2011 5
2012 15
2013 15
2014 11
2015 18
2016 13
2017 17
2018 3
2019 6
2020 2
2021 4
Total 201
Download as CSV

Robert T Woods publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert T Woods sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 177 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 177
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert T Woods D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert T Woods sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248 63
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Cognition
  • Dementia
  • Mental illness

His main research concerns Dementia, Psychological intervention, Quality of life, Activities of daily living and Intervention. His Dementia study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Psychiatry, Family medicine, Developmental psychology, Evidence-based medicine and Clinical psychology. His Developmental psychology research integrates issues from Alzheimer's disease, Anosognosia and Cognitive disorder.

His Clinical psychology research incorporates themes from Construct validity and Caregiver wellbeing. His Psychological intervention research includes themes of Gerontology, Cognitive rehabilitation therapy, Cognition, Mood and Physical therapy. As a member of one scientific family, Robert T Woods mostly works in the field of Cognition, focusing on Psychotherapist and, on occasion, Cognitive training.

His most cited work include:

  • Whose quality of life is it anyway? The validity and reliability of the Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD) scale. (329 citations)
  • Cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation for people with early-stage Alzheimer's disease: A review (312 citations)
  • A European consensus on outcome measures for psychosocial intervention research in dementia care (277 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Robert T Woods mainly focuses on Dementia, Clinical psychology, Psychological intervention, Cognition and Psychiatry. He interconnects Gerontology, Nursing, Intervention, Quality of life and Activities of daily living in the investigation of issues within Dementia. Robert T Woods combines subjects such as Psychotherapist, Personality and Vascular dementia with his study of Clinical psychology.

In his work, Cognitive therapy is strongly intertwined with Physical therapy, which is a subfield of Psychological intervention. His Cognition research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Developmental psychology, Association, Social isolation and Anxiety. His Developmental psychology research incorporates themes from Anosognosia, Cognitive disorder and Stroop effect.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Dementia (56.94%)
  • Clinical psychology (25.00%)
  • Psychological intervention (21.53%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2020)?

  • Dementia (56.94%)
  • Physical therapy (13.19%)
  • Cognition (20.14%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His scientific interests lie mostly in Dementia, Physical therapy, Cognition, Clinical psychology and Psychological intervention. His Dementia study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Nursing, Family caregivers, Gerontology and Psychosocial, Psychiatry. In his research on the topic of Physical therapy, Service user and Medical physics is strongly related with Intervention.

His work carried out in the field of Cognition brings together such families of science as Social isolation, Moderation, Depression and Anxiety. His research integrates issues of Neuropsychology, Memory Dysfunction, Rating scale, Cognitive stimulation therapy and Memory impairment in his study of Clinical psychology. Mental health and Reminiscence is closely connected to Quality of life in his research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Psychological intervention.

Between 2014 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • REMCARE: Pragmatic Multi-Centre Randomised Trial of Reminiscence Groups for People with Dementia and their Family Carers: Effectiveness and Economic Analysis (53 citations)
  • The impact of individual Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (iCST) on cognition, quality of life, caregiver health, and family relationships in dementia: A randomised controlled trial (50 citations)
  • Individual cognitive stimulation therapy for dementia: a clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. (47 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Cognition
  • Psychiatry
  • Mental illness

Robert T Woods spends much of his time researching Dementia, Cognition, Psychiatry, Psychological intervention and Physical therapy. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Psychosocial, Applied psychology, Activities of daily living, Family caregivers and Face. His study on Cognition also encompasses disciplines like

  • Association that intertwine with fields like Clinical psychology,
  • Depression and related Medical prescription, Care homes and Longitudinal Course,
  • Moderation and related Developmental psychology and Interpersonal relationship,
  • Social isolation that connect with fields like Feeling and Loneliness.

Specifically, his work in Psychiatry is concerned with the study of Mood. His study looks at the intersection of Mood and topics like Anxiety with Cognitive skill. His Psychological intervention study also includes fields such as

  • Quality of life and related Mental health,
  • Intervention that connect with fields like Reminiscence.

Best Publications

  • Cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation for people with early-stage Alzheimer's disease: A review

    Linda Clare;Robert T. Woods

  • Whose quality of life is it anyway? The validity and reliability of the Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD) scale.

    L Thorgrimsen;A Selwood;A Spector;L Royan

  • A European consensus on outcome measures for psychosocial intervention research in dementia care

    E. Moniz-Cook;M. Vernooij-Dassen;R. Woods;F. R. Verhey

  • Goal-oriented cognitive rehabilitation for people with early-stage Alzheimer disease: a single-blind randomized controlled trial of clinical efficacy.

    Linda Clare;David E.J. Linden;Robert T. Woods;Rhiannon Whitaker

  • Factors affecting timely recognition and diagnosis of dementia across Europe: from awareness to stigma

    Myrra J F J Vernooij-Dassen;Esme D Moniz-Cook;Robert T Woods;Jan De Lepeleire

  • Examination of a theoretical model of psychological resilience in older age.

    Gill Windle;David A. Markland;Robert T. Woods

  • Cognitive stimulation for dementia: A systematic review of the evidence of effectiveness from randomised controlled trials

    Elisa Aguirre;Robert T. Woods;Aimee Spector;Martin Orrell

  • Malnutrition and quality of life in older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Solah Rasheed;Robert T. Woods

  • Subjective memory complaints and awareness of memory functioning in mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review.

    Judith Roberts;L. Clare;R. T. Woods

  • Strain in nursing care of people with dementia: nurses' experience in Australia, Sweden and United Kingdom.

    Anna Karin Edberg;Mike Bird;David A. Richards;Robert Woods

  • Social isolation, cognitive reserve, and cognition in healthy older people

    Isobel E. M. Evans;David J. Llewellyn;Fiona E. Matthews;Fiona E. Matthews;Robert T. Woods

  • Maintenance cognitive stimulation therapy for dementia: single-blind, multicentre, pragmatic randomised controlled trial

    Martin Orrell;Elisa Aguirre;Aimee Spector;Zoe Hoare

  • Discovering the person with Alzheimer's disease: cognitive, emotional and behavioural aspects.

    R T Woods

  • The impact of motivations and meanings on the wellbeing of caregivers of people with dementia: a systematic review.

    Catherine Quinn;Linda Clare;Robert T Woods

  • REMCARE: reminiscence groups for people with dementia and their family caregivers - effectiveness and cost-effectiveness pragmatic multicentre randomised trial

    RT Woods;E Bruce;RT Edwards;R Elvish

  • Cognitive rehabilitation interventions targeting memory functioning in early-stage Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia

    L Clare;RT Woods;ED Moniz-Cook;M Orrell

  • The impact of individual Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (iCST) on cognition, quality of life, caregiver health, and family relationships in dementia: A randomised controlled trial

    Martin Orrell;Lauren Yates;Phuong Leung;Sujin Kang

  • The influence of psychological, social and contextual factors on the expression and measurement of awareness in early-stage dementia: testing a biopsychosocial model

    Linda Clare;Sharon M. Nelis;Anthony Martyr;Judith Roberts

  • Dementia: issues in early recognition and intervention in primary care

    R. T. Woods;Esme Moniz-Cook;Steve Iliffe;Peter Campion

  • Living alone and cognitive function in later life.

    Isobel E M Evans;David J Llewellyn;Fiona E Matthews;Robert T Woods

  • Variations in subjective wellbeing: the mediating role of a psychological resource

    Gill Windle;Robert T. Woods

Frequent Co-Authors

Linda Clare
Linda Clare University of Exeter
Christopher J. Whitaker
Christopher J. Whitaker Bangor University
Esme Moniz-Cook
Esme Moniz-Cook University of Hull
Martin Orrell
Martin Orrell University of Nottingham
Aimee Spector
Aimee Spector University College London
Robin G. Morris
Robin G. Morris King's College London
Sharon M. Nelis
Sharon M. Nelis University of Exeter
Ian Russell
Ian Russell Swansea University
Martin Knapp
Martin Knapp London School of Economics and Political Science
Rhiannon Tudor Edwards
Rhiannon Tudor Edwards Bangor University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide variety of online degrees and career pathways. Many students are now considering specialized fields such as counseling, which offers both rewarding personal impact and strong career prospects.

Selecting a top program is crucial. For those interested in the western U.S., the best-ranked counseling degree programs in Utah are gaining attention for their quality curriculum and professional outcomes. Similarly, Arizona's most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in Arizona highlights schools with excellent returns on educational investment.

If you're seeking value, consider the most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in Colorado. These programs combine affordability with high graduation rates and employability. In Florida, the best value counseling programs in Florida are noted for their flexible online options and strong licensure preparation.

Pursuing an online psychology or counseling degree can pave the way to meaningful roles in mental health, education, or private practice. Take time to compare programs in different states to find options that match your goals and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Robert T Woods

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles