World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
55
Citations
75973
World Ranking
2888
National Ranking
85

Rudolf de Groot publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rudolf de Groot sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 102 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Rudolf de Groot D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rudolf de Groot sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rudolf de Groot is affiliated with Wageningen University & Research in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to the field of Environmental Science. Their research concentrates primarily on ecosystems and the services they provide, with significant work exploring the relationships between human well-being and ecological health.

The scientist's main fields of study include Environmental Science, with subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, and Ecology.

Key research topics addressed by Rudolf de Groot encompass:

  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Urban Green Space and Health
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Coastal Wetland Ecosystem Dynamics
  • Agricultural and Environmental Management
  • Environmental Conservation and Management

Frequent publication venues for their work are:

  • Ecosystem Services
  • Global Change Biology
  • Trees Forests and People
  • Ecological Indicators
  • Journal of Environmental Management

They have collaborated frequently with a number of co-authors including Ekaningrum Damastuti, Marcel Silvius, Yuehan Dou, Xiubo Yu, and Martha Bakker.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Rudolf de Groot include:

  • Ecosystem health, ecosystem services, and the well-being of humans and the rest of nature (2022) published in Global Change Biology
  • Economic values for ecosystem services: A global synthesis and way forward (2024) published in Ecosystem Services
  • Effectiveness of community-based mangrove management for biodiversity conservation: A case study from Central Java, Indonesia (2022) published in Trees Forests and People
  • Analysis of the relationship between cross-cultural perceptions of landscapes and cultural ecosystem services in Genheyuan region, Northeast China (2020) published in Ecosystem Services
  • Ecosystem services or nature's contributions? Reasons behind different interpretations in Latin America (2020) published in Ecosystem Services

Best Publications

  • The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital

    Robert Costanza;Rudolf de Groot;Stephen Farberk;Monica Grasso

  • A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services

    R.S. de Groot;M.A. Wilson;R.M.J. Boumans

  • Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making

    R.S. de Groot;R. Alkemade;L. Braat;L. Hein

  • Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units

    Rudolf De Groot;Luke Brander;Sander Van Der Ploeg;Robert Costanza

  • Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?

    Robert Costanza;Rudolph de Groot;Leon Braat;Ida Kubiszewski

  • The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes

    Erik Gómez-Baggethun;Rudolf de Groot;Pedro L. Lomas;Carlos Montes

  • The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital

    Robert Costanza;Robert Costanza;Ralph d'Arge;Rudolf de Groot;Stephen Farber

  • Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services

    L.G. Hein;C.S.A. van Koppen;R.S. de Groot;E.C. van Ierland

  • The ecosystem services agenda:bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy

    Leon C. Braat;Rudolf de Groot

  • A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability

    Paul Ekins;Sandrine Simon;Lisa Deutsch;Carl Folke;Carl Folke

  • Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes

    Rudolf de Groot

  • A conceptual framework for selecting environmental indicator sets

    David Niemeijer;Rudolf S. de Groot

  • Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas

    Thomas Elmqvist;Heikki Martti Setälä;SN Handel;S van der Ploeg

  • Ecosystem Services as a Contested Concept: a Synthesis of Critique and Counter-Arguments

    Matthias Schröter;Emma H. van der Zanden;Alexander P.E. van Oudenhoven;Roy P. Remme

  • Ecosystem services and economic theory: integration for policy-relevant research.

    Brendan Fisher;Kerry Turner;Matthew Zylstra;Roy Brouwer

  • Framework for systematic indicator selection to assess effects of land management on ecosystem services

    Alexander P.E. van Oudenhoven;Katalin Petz;Rob Alkemade;Lars Hein

  • The value of ecosystem services: putting the issues in perspective

    Robert Costanza;Ralph d’Arge;Rudolf de Groot;Stephen Farber

  • Ecosystem services and ethics

    Kurt Jax;Kurt Jax;David N. Barton;Kai M.A. Chan;Rudolf de Groot

  • Critical natural capital: a socio-cultural perspective

    Anna Chiesura;Rudolf de Groot

  • Benefits of Investing in Ecosystem Restoration

    Rudolf S. De Groot;James Nelson Blignaut;Sander Van der Ploeg;James Aronson;James Aronson

  • Framing environmental indicators: moving from causal chains to causal networks

    David Niemeijer;Rudolf S. de Groot

  • Assessing Landscape Functions with Broad-Scale Environmental Data: Insights Gained from a Prototype Development for Europe

    Felix Kienast;Janine Bolliger;Marion Potschin;Rudolf S. de Groot

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Costanza
Robert Costanza University College London
James Aronson
James Aronson Missouri Botanical Garden
Erik Gómez-Baggethun
Erik Gómez-Baggethun Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Paul C. Sutton
Paul C. Sutton University of Denver
Karin E. Limburg
Karin E. Limburg SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry
Rik Leemans
Rik Leemans Wageningen University & Research
José M. Paruelo
José M. Paruelo University of Buenos Aires
Shahid Naeem
Shahid Naeem Columbia University
James Nelson Blignaut
James Nelson Blignaut Stellenbosch University
Ignacio Palomo
Ignacio Palomo Grenoble Alpes University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens the door to a wide range of professional opportunities—many of which now offer flexible online pathways. For those interested in blending natural sciences with healthcare, programs like the adn to np programs are designed for registered nurses aiming to become nurse practitioners, potentially integrating environmental perspectives into patient care.

Even non-nurses can enter advanced practice roles through specialized courses such as the online direct entry msn. These programs provide a streamlined route to a Master of Science in Nursing, regardless of previous experience.

Choosing the right school is important, so reviewing resources like wgu vs chamberlain can help you compare institutions by curriculum, cost, and flexibility.

For those looking for further advancement, the bsn to msn online options offer affordable, fully accredited bridge programs, making career progression more accessible for graduates in related scientific and healthcare fields.

Best Scientists Citing Rudolf de Groot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles