World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
30
Citations
5559
World Ranking
13922
National Ranking
5534

Ming-Chien Shan publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ming-Chien Shan sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 96 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ming-Chien Shan D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ming-Chien Shan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ming-Chien Shan is affiliated with Hewlett-Packard in the United States. Their professional activity is primarily located within the United States.

There are no records of published papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues associated with Ming-Chien Shan. Similarly, there are no entries for book publications, fields of study, subfields, or main research topics documented in the available data.

No awards or recognitions have been recorded. There is no indication that Ming-Chien Shan is deceased.

Best Publications

  • Adaptive and Dynamic Service Composition in eFlow

    Fabio Casati;Ski Ilnicki;Li-jie Jin;Vasudev Krishnamoorthy

  • Business process intelligence

    Daniela Grigori;Fabio Casati;Malu Castellanos;Umeshwar Dayal

  • Dynamic and adaptive composition of e-services

    Fabio Casati;Ming-Chien Shan

  • The Pegasus heterogeneous multidatabase system

    R. Ahmed;P. DeSmedt;W. Du;W. Kent

  • Improving Business Process Quality through Exception Understanding, Prediction, and Prevention

    Daniela Grigori;Fabio Casati;Umeshwar Dayal;Ming-Chien Shan

  • Business-oriented management of Web services

    Fabio Casati;Eric Shan;Umeshwar Dayal;Ming-Chien Shan

  • Developing E-Services for Composing E-Services

    Fabio Casati;Mehmet Sayal;Ming-Chien Shan

  • Business process cockpit

    Mehmet Sayal;Fabio Casati;Umeshwar Dayal;Ming-Chien Shan

  • eFlow: a platform for developing and managing composite e-services

    F. Casati;S. Ilnicki;Li-Jie Jin;V. Krishnamoorthy

  • Technologies for E-Services

    Alejandro Buchmann;Ludger Fiege;Fabio Casati;Mei-Chun Hsu

  • Method and system for integrating workflow management systems with business-to-business interaction standards

    Mehmet Sayal;Fabio Casati;Ming-Chien Shan

  • Event-based scheduling method and system for workflow activities

    Fabio Casati;Ming-Chien Shan

  • Hosted Universal Composition: Models, Languages and Infrastructure in mashArt

    Florian Daniel;Fabio Casati;Boualem Benatallah;Ming-Chien Shan

  • System and method for monitoring event based systems

    Fabio Casati;Ming-Chien Shan;Rama Chandra Murthy

  • Query Optimization in a Heterogeneous DBMS

    Unknown

  • iBOM: a platform for intelligent business operation management

    M. Castellanos;F. Casati;M.-C. Shan;U. Dayal

  • Modeling tool for electronic services and associated methods and businesses

    Fabio Casati;Ming-Chien Shan;Mehmet Sayal

  • Method of load balancing a distributed workflow management system

    Li-Jie Jin;Fabio Casati;Ming-Chien Shan

  • Investigating business processes

    Fabio Casati;Ming-Chien Shan;Mehmet Sayal

  • Optimization of Multi-Way Join Queries for Parallel Execution

    Hongjun Lu;Ming-Chien Shan;Kian-Lee Tan

  • Dynamically defining workflow processes using generic nodes

    Fabio Casati;Ming-Chien Shan

  • A Comprehensive and Automated Approach to Intelligent Business Processes Execution Analysis

    Malu Castellanos;Fabio Casati;Umeshwar Dayal;Ming-Chien Shan

  • Adaptive and Dynamic Service Composition in eFlow

    Fabio Casati;LiJie Jin;Ski Ilinicki;Vasudev Krishnamoorthy

  • Warehousing Workflow Data: Challenges and Opportunities

    Angela Bonifati;Fabio Casati;Umeshwar Dayal;Ming-Chien Shan

  • Integrating workflow management systems with business-to-business interaction standards

    M. Sayal;F. Casati;U. Dayal;Ming-Chien Shan

  • Semantic Analysis of Business Process Executions

    Fabio Casati;Ming-Chien Shan

  • Reducing multidatabase query response time by tree balancing

    Weimin Du;Ming-Chien Shan;Umeshwar Dayal

  • Load balancing in distributed workflow management system

    Li-jie Jin;Fabio Casati;Mehmet Sayal;Ming-Chien Shan

  • Definition, Execution, Analysis, and Optimization of Composite E-Services.

    Fabio Casati;Ming-Chien Shan

Frequent Co-Authors

Fabio Casati
Fabio Casati University of Trento
Umeshwar Dayal
Umeshwar Dayal Hitachi (Japan)
Meichun Hsu
Meichun Hsu Hewlett Packard Enterprise (United States)
Heiko Ludwig
Heiko Ludwig IBM (United States)
Alejandro Buchmann
Alejandro Buchmann Technical University of Darmstadt
Florian Daniel
Florian Daniel Polytechnic University of Milan
Boualem Benatallah
Boualem Benatallah Dublin City University
Dimitrios Georgakopoulos
Dimitrios Georgakopoulos Swinburne University of Technology
Paul Grefen
Paul Grefen Eindhoven University of Technology
Angela Bonifati
Angela Bonifati Claude Bernard University Lyon 1

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online study options in Computer Science opens up diverse opportunities and flexible pathways. Many online schools that accept low gpa make it possible for students with varying academic backgrounds to pursue their goals. This accessibility helps more learners start a tech career without the traditional entry barriers.

Students looking to fast-track their education can consider accelerated computer science degree online programs. These programs allow motivated students to graduate quicker and enter the workforce sooner, making them a practical option for career changers or working professionals.

If you’re interested in how technology interacts with our environment, an environmental engineering bachelor's degree online can lead to rewarding and innovative roles at the intersection of engineering, science, and sustainability.

Additionally, branching out into related fields expands your career prospects. Curious about interdisciplinary paths? Discover what can you do with an environmental science major to see how these studies can enhance your tech skillset and broaden your career options.

Best Scientists Citing Ming-Chien Shan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles