World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rüdiger Hehlmann

Rüdiger Hehlmann

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 78 17876 16804 940 905 379 28231

Rüdiger Hehlmann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rüdiger Hehlmann between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rüdiger Hehlmann published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 8.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2007. 10 of the 403 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2007. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 8 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 8 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 19 publications 2005: 23 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 25 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 6 publications
1978 2025

403 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rüdiger Hehlmann: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 4
1981 4
1982 2
1983 4
1984 5
1985 8
1986 4
1987 4
1988 3
1989 4
1990 2
1991 1
1992 2
1993 4
1994 2
1995 1
1996 8
1997 6
1998 6
1999 10
2000 6
2001 5
2002 4
2003 8
2004 19
2005 23
2006 21
2007 25
2008 11
2009 12
2010 12
2011 15
2012 13
2013 22
2014 20
2015 9
2016 18
2017 17
2018 6
2019 4
2020 12
2021 5
2022 9
2023 12
2024 4
2025 6
Total 403
Download as CSV

Rüdiger Hehlmann publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rüdiger Hehlmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 379 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838 379
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Rüdiger Hehlmann D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rüdiger Hehlmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 78
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Rüdiger Hehlmann is affiliated with Heidelberg University in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, particularly focusing on hematology and leukemia research. Their scholarly output includes numerous publications related to chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and related hematologic disorders.

Their main fields of study encompass medicine with specialization in subfields such as hematology, genetics, rheumatology, organic chemistry, and public health, environmental, and occupational health.

Key topics of research covered by their work include:

  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes
  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Research
  • Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Fungal Plant Pathogen Control

Their recent research papers include:

  • The EUTOS long-term survival (ELTS) score is superior to the Sokal score for predicting survival in chronic myeloid leukemia (2020) published in Leukemia
  • European LeukemiaNet laboratory recommendations for the diagnosis and management of chronic myeloid leukemia (2023) published in Leukemia
  • High-risk additional chromosomal abnormalities at low blast counts herald death by CML (2020) published in Leukemia
  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in 2020 (2020) published in HemaSphere
  • The New ELN Recommendations for Treating CML (2020) published in Journal of Clinical Medicine

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Rüdiger Hehlmann include:

  • Andreas Hochhaus
  • Susanne Saußele
  • Dietger Niederwieser
  • Markus Pfirrmann
  • Alice Fabarius

The primary venues for their publications are:

  • Leukemia
  • Blood
  • Cellular Therapy and Transplantation
  • HemaSphere
  • Leukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma

Best Publications

  • European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: 2013

    Michele Baccarani;Michael W. Deininger;Gianantonio Rosti;Andreas Hochhaus

  • Evolving concepts in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet

    Michele Baccarani;Giuseppe Saglio;John Goldman;Andreas Hochhaus

  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: An Update of Concepts and Management Recommendations of European LeukemiaNet

    Michele Baccarani;Jorge Cortes;Fabrizio Pane;Dietger Niederwieser

  • Widespread occurrence of the JAK2 V617F mutation in chronic myeloproliferative disorders

    Amy V. Jones;Sebastian Kreil;Katerina Zoi;Katherine Waghorn

  • Monitoring CML patients responding to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: review and recommendations for harmonizing current methodology for detecting BCR-ABL transcripts and kinase domain mutations and for expressing results

    Timothy P Hughes;Michael W Deininger;Andreas Hochhaus;Susan Branford

  • A new prognostic score for survival of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with interferon alfa. Writing Committee for the Collaborative CML Prognostic Factors Project Group.

    Joerg Hasford;Markus Pfirrmann;Rüdiger Hehlmann;Norman C. Allan

  • Philadelphia-Negative Classical Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Critical Concepts and Management Recommendations From European LeukemiaNet

    Tiziano Barbui;Giovanni Barosi;Gunnar Birgegard;Francisco Cervantes

  • Chronic myeloid leukaemia

    Rüdiger Hehlmann;Andreas Hochhaus;Michele Baccarani

  • Predicting complete cytogenetic response and subsequent progression-free survival in 2060 patients with CML on imatinib treatment: the EUTOS score

    Joerg Hasford;Michele Baccarani;Verena Hoffmann;Joelle Guilhot

  • An evidence-based analysis of the effect of busulfan, hydroxyurea, interferon, and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in treating the chronic phase of chronic myeloid leukemia: Developed for the American Society of Hematology

    Richard T. Silver;Steven H. Woolf;Rüdiger Hehlmann;Frederick R. Appelbaum

  • Philadelphia chromosome-negative classical myeloproliferative neoplasms: Revised management recommendations from European LeukemiaNet

    Tiziano Barbui;Ayalew Tefferi;Alessandro M. Vannucchi;Francesco Passamonti

  • Early molecular and cytogenetic response is predictive for long-term progression-free and overall survival in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML).

    B. Hanfstein;M. C. Müller;R. Hehlmann;P. Erben

  • Tolerability-Adapted Imatinib 800 mg/d Versus 400 mg/d Versus 400 mg/d Plus Interferon-α in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

    Rüdiger Hehlmann;Michael Lauseker;Susanne Jung-Munkwitz;Armin Leitner

  • Deep Molecular Response Is Reached by the Majority of Patients Treated With Imatinib, Predicts Survival, and Is Achieved More Quickly by Optimized High-Dose Imatinib: Results From the Randomized CML-Study IV

    Rüdiger Hehlmann;Martin C. Müller;Michael Lauseker;Benjamin Hanfstein

  • Impact of additional cytogenetic aberrations at diagnosis on prognosis of CML: long-term observation of 1151 patients from the randomized CML Study IV

    Alice Fabarius;Armin Leitner;Andreas Hochhaus;Martin C. Müller

  • Assessment of imatinib as first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia: 10-year survival results of the randomized CML study IV and impact of non-CML determinants

    Rüdiger Hehlmann;Michael Lauseker;Susanne Saußele;Markus Pfirrmann

  • The t(8;9)(p22;p24) is a recurrent abnormality in chronic and acute leukemia that fuses PCM1 to JAK2

    Andreas Reiter;Christoph Walz;Ann Watmore;Claudia Schoch

  • How I treat CML blast crisis

    Rüdiger Hehlmann

  • Prognosis of long-term survival considering disease-specific death in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia

    M. Pfirrmann;M. Baccarani;S. Saussele;J. Guilhot

  • Specific Detection of Aspergillus Species in Blood and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Samples of Immunocompromised Patients by Two-Step PCR

    Heyko Skladny;Dieter Buchheidt;Corinna Baust;Frank Krieg-Schneider

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas Hochhaus
Andreas Hochhaus Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Stefan W. Krause
Stefan W. Krause University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Claudia Haferlach
Claudia Haferlach Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Lothar Kanz
Lothar Kanz University of Tübingen
Michael Pfreundschuh
Michael Pfreundschuh Saarland University
Susanne Schnittger
Susanne Schnittger Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Andreas Reiter
Andreas Reiter Heidelberg University
Hans-Jochem Kolb
Hans-Jochem Kolb Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Michael Kneba
Michael Kneba Kiel University
Michele Baccarani
Michele Baccarani University of Bologna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens the door to a wide range of related online degrees and career options in healthcare. Aspiring professionals no longer need to attend a campus full-time, as many accredited programs are now offered fully online and at a lower cost. For those interested in healthcare leadership or hospital management, exploring the cheapest mha programs online can be a practical next step after a medical degree.

Nursing professionals who want to advance their clinical expertise can consider the cheapest dnp online programs. Pharmacists or those interested in pharmacy careers may be drawn to the 3-year online pharmd programs designed for working adults.

For those focused on the intersection of healthcare and technology, a degree in healthcare informatics is increasingly sought-after. Online healthcare informatics degree programs prepare graduates to manage patient data, improve care quality, and lead digital transformation within medical facilities.

These online pathways make it easier to achieve advanced qualifications, adapt to changing healthcare needs, and pursue rewarding careers beyond traditional medicine.

Best Scientists Citing Rüdiger Hehlmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles