World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
55
Citations
11092
World Ranking
15037
National Ranking
6294

Charles Searby publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles Searby sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 122 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Charles Searby D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles Searby sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles Searby is affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine. Their work spans multiple subfields including genetics, molecular biology, ophthalmology, cell biology, and biophysics. The primary focus of their research encompasses genetic and kidney cyst diseases, electromagnetic fields and their biological effects, retinal development and disorders, cellular transport and secretion, glaucoma and retinal disorders, retinal diseases and treatments, as well as genetic syndromes and imprinting.

The scientist's recent publications reflect a concentration on molecular and cellular mechanisms related to eye diseases and metabolic conditions. Key papers include:

  • ATF4 leads to glaucoma by promoting protein synthesis and ER client protein load (2020, Nature Communications)
  • Exposure to Static Magnetic and Electric Fields Treats Type 2 Diabetes (2020, Cell Metabolism)
  • Simultaneous detection of the enzyme activities of GPx1 and GPx4 guide optimization of selenium in cell biological experiments (2020, Redox Biology)
  • Autophagy stimulation reduces ocular hypertension in a murine glaucoma model via autophagic degradation of mutant myocilin (2021, JCI Insight)
  • Disulfiram causes selective hypoxic cancer cell toxicity and radio-chemo-sensitization via redox cycling of copper (2020, Free Radical Biology and Medicine)

Their frequent co-authors demonstrate collaboration with other researchers focused on related fields. Notable collaborators include:

  • Val C. Sheffield
  • Kai Wang
  • Qihong Zhang
  • Calvin S. Carter
  • Sunny C. Huang

Charles Searby's work has appeared in a range of publication venues. Their most frequent publication outlets include:

  • Cell Metabolism
  • American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • Redox Biology

The broad scope of their research across genetics, ophthalmology, and molecular biology reflects an interdisciplinary approach to understanding complex biological and medical challenges. Their published work contributes to ongoing discussions in cellular transport, protein regulation in eye diseases, and the physiological effects of electromagnetic fields among other topics.

Best Publications

  • Mutation of a nuclear receptor gene, NR2E3, causes enhanced S cone syndrome, a disorder of retinal cell fate

    Neena B. Haider;Samuel G. Jacobson;Artur V. Cideciyan;Ruth Swiderski

  • The forkhead transcription factor gene FKHL7 is responsible for glaucoma phenotypes which map to 6p25.

    Darryl Y. Nishimura;Ruth E. Swiderski;Wallace L. M. Alward;Charles C. Searby

  • Identification of the gene (BBS1) most commonly involved in Bardet-Biedl syndrome, a complex human obesity syndrome.

    Kirk Mykytyn;Darryl Y. Nishimura;Charles C. Searby;Mythreyi Shastri

  • Bbs2-null mice have neurosensory deficits, a defect in social dominance, and retinopathy associated with mislocalization of rhodopsin

    Darryl Y. Nishimura;Melissa Fath;Robert F. Mullins;Charles Searby

  • An autosomal genomic screen for autism. Collaborative linkage study of autism.

    Barrett S;Beck Jc;Bernier R;Bisson E

  • An autosomal genomic screen for autism

    Stacey Barrett;John C. Beck;Raphael Bernier;Erica Bisson

  • Non-secretion of mutant proteins of the glaucoma gene myocilin in cultured trabecular meshwork cells and in aqueous humor

    Nasreen Jacobson;Michael Andrews;Allan R. Shepard;Darryl Nishimura

  • A BBSome subunit links ciliogenesis, microtubule stability, and acetylation.

    Alexander V. Loktev;Qihong Zhang;John S. Beck;Charles C. Searby

  • Identification of the gene that, when mutated, causes the human obesity syndrome BBS4

    Kirk Mykytyn;Terry Braun;Terry Braun;Rivka Carmi;Neena B. Haider

  • Positional cloning of a novel gene on chromosome 16q causing Bardet–Biedl syndrome (BBS2)

    Darryl Y. Nishimura;Charles C. Searby;Rivka Carmi;Khalil Elbedour

  • A knockin mouse model of the Bardet–Biedl syndrome 1 M390R mutation has cilia defects, ventriculomegaly, retinopathy, and obesity

    Roger E. Davis;Ruth E. Swiderski;Kamal Rahmouni;Darryl Y. Nishimura

  • Reduction of ER stress via a chemical chaperone prevents disease phenotypes in a mouse model of primary open angle glaucoma

    Gulab S. Zode;Markus H. Kuehn;Darryl Y. Nishimura;Charles C. Searby

  • Comparative Genomics and Gene Expression Analysis Identifies BBS9, a New Bardet-Biedl Syndrome Gene

    Darryl Y. Nishimura;Ruth E. Swiderski;Charles C. Searby;Erik M. Berg

  • A spectrum of FOXC1 mutations suggests gene dosage as a mechanism for developmental defects of the anterior chamber of the eye

    Darryl Y. Nishimura;Charles C. Searby;Wallace L. Alward;David Walton

  • Comparative Genomic Analysis Identifies an ADP-Ribosylation Factor–like Gene as the Cause of Bardet-Biedl Syndrome (BBS3)

    Annie P. Chiang;Darryl Nishimura;Charles Searby;Khalil Elbedour

  • ARL13B, PDE6D, and CEP164 form a functional network for INPP5E ciliary targeting

    Melissa C. Humbert;Katie Weihbrecht;Charles C. Searby;Yalan Li

  • Compound heterozygosity for loss-of-function lysyl-tRNA synthetase mutations in a patient with peripheral neuropathy.

    Heather M. McLaughlin;Reiko Sakaguchi;Cuiping Liu;Takao Igarashi

  • A Novel Protein LZTFL1 Regulates Ciliary Trafficking of the BBSome and Smoothened

    Seongjin Seo;Qihong Zhang;Qihong Zhang;Kevin Bugge;Kevin Bugge;David K. Breslow

  • Mkks-null mice have a phenotype resembling Bardet–Biedl syndrome

    Melissa A. Fath;Robert F. Mullins;Charles Searby;Darryl Y. Nishimura

  • CRISPR-Cas9–based treatment of myocilin-associated glaucoma

    Ankur Jain;Gulab Zode;Ramesh B. Kasetti;Fei A. Ran

Frequent Co-Authors

Val C. Sheffield
Val C. Sheffield University of Iowa
Edwin M. Stone
Edwin M. Stone University of Iowa
Kamal Rahmouni
Kamal Rahmouni University of Iowa Health Care
Abbot F. Clark
Abbot F. Clark University of North Texas Health Science Center
Robert F. Mullins
Robert F. Mullins University of Iowa
Kai Wang
Kai Wang Jilin University
Samuel G. Jacobson
Samuel G. Jacobson University of Pennsylvania
Garry R. Buettner
Garry R. Buettner University of Iowa
Todd E. Scheetz
Todd E. Scheetz University of Iowa
Leslie G. Biesecker
Leslie G. Biesecker National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Charles Searby

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles