World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
66
Citations
24203
World Ranking
2037
National Ranking
832

Robert O. Green publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert O. Green sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 334 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Robert O. Green D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert O. Green sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert O. Green is affiliated with the California Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research primarily spans Environmental Science and Engineering, encompassing a total of sixteen publications across these fields.

Their subfields of study include Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, and Atmospheric Science. The main topics of Green's work cover Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Calibration and Measurement Techniques, Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping, Urban Heat Island Mitigation, Cryospheric Studies and Observations, Atmospheric Aerosols and Clouds, and Remote Sensing in Agriculture.

Green has contributed to several peer-reviewed papers published largely in Remote Sensing of Environment, where four articles appear, along with publications in the SSRN Electronic Journal, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, and the Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

  • Optimal estimation of snow and ice surface parameters from imaging spectroscopy measurements (2021, Remote Sensing of Environment)
  • Uncertainty quantification for a global imaging spectroscopy surface composition investigation (2020, Remote Sensing of Environment)
  • Joint VSWIR-TIR retrievals of earth's surface and atmosphere (2021, Remote Sensing of Environment)
  • Sensitivity and Uncertainty in Matched-Filter-Based Gas Detection With Imaging Spectroscopy (2024, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing)
  • Scene invariants for quantifying radiative transfer uncertainty (2021, Remote Sensing of Environment)

Frequent collaborators in their research include David R. Thompson, Niklas Bohn, Philip G. Brodrick, Nimrod Carmon, and Kerry Cawse-Nicholson. These collaborations have contributed to advancing understanding in measurement techniques and environmental monitoring through imaging spectroscopy and related methods.

Best Publications

  • Imaging Spectroscopy and the Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS)

    Robert O Green;Michael L Eastwood;Charles M Sarture;Thomas G Chrien

  • Mapping Chaparral in the Santa Monica Mountains Using Multiple Endmember Spectral Mixture Models

    D.A. Roberts;M. Gardner;R. Church;S. Ustin

  • Mapping target signatures via partial unmixing of AVIRIS data

    Joseph W. Boardman;Fred A. Kruse;Robert O. Green

  • Compact Reconnaissance Imaging Spectrometer for Mars (CRISM) on Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO)

    Scott Murchie;R. Arvidson;P. Bedini;K. Beisser

  • The airborne visible/infrared imaging spectrometer (AVIRIS)

    Gregg Vane;Robert O Green;Thomas G Chrien;Harry T Enmark

  • Character and Spatial Distribution of OH/H2O on the Surface of the Moon Seen by M3 on Chandrayaan-1

    C. M. Pieters;J. N. Goswami;J. N. Goswami;R. N. Clark;M. Annadurai

  • Hydrated silicate minerals on Mars observed by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter CRISM instrument

    John F. Mustard;Scott L. Murchie;S. M. Pelkey;B. L. Ehlmann

  • Using Imaging Spectroscopy to Study Ecosystem Processes and Properties

    Susan L. Ustin;Dar A. Roberts;John A. Gamon;Gregory P. Asner

  • Retrieval of subpixel snow-covered area and grain size from imaging spectrometer data

    Thomas H. Painter;Jeff Dozier;Dar A. Roberts;Robert E. Davis

  • Airborne methane remote measurements reveal heavy-tail flux distribution in Four Corners region

    Christian Frankenberg;Andrew K. Thorpe;David R. Thompson;Glynn Hulley

  • Opaline silica in young deposits on Mars

    Ralph E. Milliken;Gregg A. Swayze;Raymond E. Arvidson;Janice L Bishop

  • Design of pushbroom imaging spectrometers for optimum recovery of spectroscopic and spatial information

    Pantazis Mouroulis;Robert O. Green;Thomas G. Chrien

  • California's methane super-emitters.

    Riley M. Duren;Riley M. Duren;Andrew K. Thorpe;Kelsey T. Foster;Talha Rafiq

  • Carnegie Airborne Observatory-2: Increasing science data dimensionality via high-fidelity multi-sensor fusion

    Gregory P. Asner;David E. Knapp;Joseph Boardman;Robert O. Green

  • An introduction to the NASA Hyperspectral InfraRed Imager (HyspIRI) mission and preparatory activities

    Christine M. Lee;Morgan L. Cable;Simon J. Hook;Robert O. Green

  • Invasive plants transform the three-dimensional structure of rain forests.

    Gregory P. Asner;R. Flint Hughes;Peter M. Vitousek;David E. Knapp

  • The Moon Mineralogy Mapper (M 3 ) on Chandrayaan-1

    Carle M. Pieters;Joseph Boardman;Bonnie Buratti;Alok Chatterjee

  • The Moon Mineralogy Mapper (M3) imaging spectrometer for lunar science: Instrument description, calibration, on‐orbit measurements, science data calibration and on‐orbit validation

    R.O. Green;C. Pieters;P. Mouroulis;M. Eastwood

  • Temporal and spatial patterns in vegetation and atmospheric properties from AVIRIS

    D.A. Roberts;R.O. Green;R.O. Green;J.B. Adams

  • The Effect of Grain Size on Spectral Mixture Analysis of Snow-Covered Area from AVIRIS Data

    Thomas H. Painter;Dar A. Roberts;Robert O. Green;Robert O. Green;Jeff Dozier

  • Airborne Visible/Infrared Imaging Spectrometer 3 (AVIRIS-3)

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Dar A. Roberts
Dar A. Roberts University of California, Santa Barbara
Bethany L. Ehlmann
Bethany L. Ehlmann University of Colorado Boulder
Christian Frankenberg
Christian Frankenberg California Institute of Technology
Carle M. Pieters
Carle M. Pieters Brown University
Philip E. Dennison
Philip E. Dennison University of Utah
John F. Mustard
John F. Mustard Brown University
Thomas H. Painter
Thomas H. Painter University of California, Los Angeles
Charles E. Miller
Charles E. Miller California Institute of Technology
James W. Head
James W. Head Brown University
Jeff Dozier
Jeff Dozier University of California, Santa Barbara

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences often opens doors to diverse educational and career opportunities. For those interested in advancing their expertise without the traditional dissertation route, several online doctoral programs without dissertation offer flexible alternatives. These programs allow professionals to focus on practical applications and leadership skills in environmental fields.

Many students also seek reputable programs, and choosing from accredited eds to edd programs ensures academic quality and recognition. Accredited degrees can significantly impact career growth, especially in educational and policy-making roles related to environmental science.

For those passionate about community engagement and social aspects of environmental work, pursuing a Doctor of Social Work through dsw programs can be a strategic path. These programs blend social science with environmental justice, expanding career pathways.

If budget is a concern, consider affordable options like a cheap online general studies degree, which can serve as a versatile foundation for specialization in environmental topics later on. Together, these diverse degree options support a range of ambitions within the environmental science sector.

Best Scientists Citing Robert O. Green

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles