World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
48
Citations
57507
World Ranking
4012
National Ranking
1730

Richard Sandstrom publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Sandstrom sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 77 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Richard Sandstrom D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Sandstrom sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard Sandstrom is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the broad field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a specific focus on Molecular Biology, Genetics, and some work involving Artificial Intelligence.

The scientist's main topics of study involve diverse aspects of genomic science and chromatin dynamics. Key areas include:

  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer

Richard Sandstrom has contributed to publications in several scientific venues, including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature
  • Genome biology
  • Cell Reports
  • Stem Cell Reports

Their recent publications include:

  • Global reference mapping of human transcription factor footprints, 2020, Nature
  • Index and biological spectrum of human DNase I hypersensitive sites, 2020, Nature
  • The ENCODE Uniform Analysis Pipelines, 2023, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The ENCODE Imputation Challenge: a critical assessment of methods for cross-cell type imputation of epigenomic profiles, 2023, Genome biology
  • Global Regulatory DNA Potentiation by SMARCA4 Propagates to Selective Gene Expression Programs via Domain-Level Remodeling, 2020, Cell Reports

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, notably:

  • Kristen Lee
  • Jessica Halow
  • J Stamatoyannopoulos
  • Morgan Diegel
  • Fidencio Neri

Best Publications

  • Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome.

    Erez Lieberman-Aiden;Nynke L. van Berkum;Louise Williams;Maxim Imakaev

  • Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes

    Anshul Kundaje;Wouter Meuleman;Wouter Meuleman;Jason Ernst

  • Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project

    Ewan Birney;John A. Stamatoyannopoulos;Anindya Dutta;Roderic Guigó

  • Systematic localization of common disease-associated variation in regulatory DNA.

    Matthew T. Maurano;Richard Humbert;Eric Rynes;Robert E. Thurman

  • Genetic effects on gene expression across human tissues.

    Enhancing GTEx (eGTEx) groups

  • The accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome

    Robert E. Thurman;Eric Rynes;Richard Humbert;Jeff Vierstra

  • An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome

    Ian Dunham;Anshul Kundaje;Shelley F. Aldred;Patrick J. Collins

  • A comparative encyclopedia of DNA elements in the mouse genome

    Feng Yue;Feng Yue;Yong Cheng;Alessandra Breschi;Jeff Vierstra

  • A User's Guide to the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE)

    Richard M. Myers;John Stamatoyannopoulos;Michael Snyder;Ian Dunham

  • Exploring the phenotypic consequences of tissue specific gene expression variation inferred from GWAS summary statistics.

    Alvaro N. Barbeira;Scott P. Dickinson;Rodrigo Bonazzola;Jiamao Zheng

  • Comprehensive analysis of the chromatin landscape in Drosophila melanogaster

    Peter V. Kharchenko;Artyom A. Alekseyenko;Artyom A. Alekseyenko;Yuri B. Schwartz;Aki Minoda

  • BEDOPS: high-performance genomic feature operations.

    Shane J. Neph;Scott Kuehn;Alex P. Reynolds;Eric Haugen

  • An expansive human regulatory lexicon encoded in transcription factor footprints

    Shane Neph;Jeff Vierstra;Andrew B. Stergachis;Alex P. Reynolds

  • Resolving the complexity of the human genome using single-molecule sequencing

    Mark J. P. Chaisson;John Huddleston;Megan Y. Dennis;Peter H. Sudmant

  • Global mapping of protein-DNA interactions in vivo by digital genomic footprinting

    Jay R. Hesselberth;Xiaoyu Chen;Zhihong Zhang;Zhihong Zhang;Peter J. Sabo

  • Widespread plasticity in CTCF occupancy linked to DNA methylation

    Hao Wang;Matthew T. Maurano;Hongzhu Qu;Hongzhu Qu;Katherine E. Varley

  • Sequencing newly replicated DNA reveals widespread plasticity in human replication timing

    R. Scott Hansen;Sean Thomas;Richard Sandstrom;Theresa K. Canfield

  • Cell-of-origin chromatin organization shapes the mutational landscape of cancer

    Paz Polak;Paz Polak;Rosa Karlić;Amnon Koren;Amnon Koren;Robert Thurman

  • Circuitry and dynamics of human transcription factor regulatory networks.

    Shane Neph;Andrew B. Stergachis;Alex Reynolds;Richard Sandstrom

  • Foxp3 Exploits a Pre-Existent Enhancer Landscape for Regulatory T Cell Lineage Specification

    Robert M. Samstein;Aaron Arvey;Steven Z. Josefowicz;Xiao Peng

Frequent Co-Authors

John A. Stamatoyannopoulos
John A. Stamatoyannopoulos University of Washington
Mark Groudine
Mark Groudine Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Rajinder Kaul
Rajinder Kaul University of Washington
Roderic Guigó
Roderic Guigó Pompeu Fabra University
Ross C. Hardison
Ross C. Hardison Pennsylvania State University
Kate R. Rosenbloom
Kate R. Rosenbloom University of California, Santa Cruz
Michael Snyder
Michael Snyder Stanford University
Bradley E. Bernstein
Bradley E. Bernstein Broad Institute
Evan E. Eichler
Evan E. Eichler University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring genetics can open doors to many exciting fields in healthcare and science. If you are interested in practical patient care, consider becoming a nurse. Some do you have to take the teas test to get into nursing school programs do not require the TEAS or HESI exams, making entry smoother for aspiring nursing students.

For those drawn to leadership and administration within healthcare, it's worth exploring the cheapest mha programs available online. These programs make advancing your career more affordable and flexible.

If you’d like to begin your nursing career quickly, LPN paths offer a streamlined option. Many lpn fast track program options let you start working in healthcare sooner and gain experience alongside your studies.

For advanced research or teaching roles, an online doctoral degree is a smart choice. There are several online phd programs in nursing that are affordable and designed for working professionals.

Whether your interest lies in direct patient care, leadership, or research, these diverse degree pathways complement a background in genetics and can help you build a successful career in the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Sandstrom

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles