World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
41
Citations
16225
World Ranking
7541
National Ranking
2676

Richard B. Lammers publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard B. Lammers sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 121 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Richard B. Lammers D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard B. Lammers sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard B. Lammers is affiliated with the University of New Hampshire in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on Environmental Science, with particular emphasis on subfields such as Water Science and Technology, Global and Planetary Change, Ocean Engineering, Atmospheric Science, and Ecology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to a range of topics including Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Water Resources Management and Optimization, Flood Risk Assessment and Management, Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies, Cryospheric Studies and Observations, Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes, and Arctic and Antarctic Ice Dynamics.

Among the recent publications authored or co-authored by Richard B. Lammers are:

  • Differential Impact of Climate Change on the Hydropower Economics of Two River Basins in High Mountain Asia, 2020, Frontiers in Environmental Science
  • Coordination and control - limits in standard representations of multi-reservoir operations in hydrological modeling, 2021, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
  • Distinguishing Direct Human-Driven Effects on the Global Terrestrial Water Cycle, 2022, Earth's Future
  • Integrated hydrological, power system and economic modelling of climate impacts on electricity demand and cost, 2022, Nature Energy
  • Water balance model (WBM) v.1.0.0: a scalable gridded global hydrologic model with water-tracking functionality, 2022, Geoscientific Model Development

Frequent co-authors in their publications include:

  • Danielle Grogan
  • Shan Zuidema
  • Karen Fisher-Vanden
  • Alexander Prusevich
  • Matthew Lisk

Richard B. Lammers has published notably in several venues with multiple contributions, including:

  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Frontiers in Environmental Science
  • Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
  • Environmental Research Letters

Best Publications

  • Global Water Resources: Vulnerability from Climate Change and Population Growth

    Charles J. Vorosmarty;Pamela Green;Joseph E. Salisbury;Richard B. Lammers

  • Increasing river discharge to the Arctic Ocean

    Bruce J Peterson;Robert M Holmes;James W McClelland;Charles J Vörösmarty

  • Coupled Atmosphere–Biophysics–Hydrology Models for Environmental Modeling

    Robert L. Walko;Larry E. Band;Jill Baron;Timothy G. F. Kittel

  • The large-scale freshwater cycle of the Arctic

    Mark C. Serreze;Andrew P. Barrett;Andrew G. Slater;Rebecca A. Woodgate

  • Assessment of contemporary Arctic river runoff based on observational discharge records

    Richard B. Lammers;Alexander I. Shiklomanov;Charles J. Vörösmarty;Balázs M. Fekete

  • Analysis of the Arctic System for Freshwater Cycle Intensification: Observations and Expectations

    Michael A. Rawlins;Michael Steele;Marika M. Holland;Jennifer C. Adam

  • Global system of rivers: Its role in organizing continental land mass and defining land-to-ocean linkages

    Charles J. Vorosmarty;Balazs M. Fekete;M. Meybeck;Richard B. Lammers

  • Widespread decline in hydrological monitoring threatens Pan-Arctic Research

    Alexander I. Shiklomanov;Richard B. Lammers;Charles J. Vorosmarty

  • Large‐scale hydro‐climatology of the terrestrial Arctic drainage system

    Mark C. Serreze;David H. Bromwich;Martyn P. Clark;Andrew J. Etringer

  • Forest ecosystem processes at the watershed scale: basis for distributed simulation

    Larry E. Band;David L. Peterson;Steven W Running;Joseph C. Coughlan

  • THE DYNAMICS OF RIVER WATER INFLOW TO THE ARCTIC OCEAN

    Igor A. Shiklomanov;Alexander I. Shiklomanov;Richard B. Lammers;B. J. Peterson

  • Rising minimum daily flows in northern Eurasian rivers: A growing influence of groundwater in the high‐latitude hydrologic cycle

    Laurence C. Smith;Tamlin M. Pavelsky;Glen M. MacDonald;Alexander I. Shiklomanov

  • Geomorphometric attributes of the global system of rivers at 30-minute spatial resolution

    Charles J. Vorosmarty;Balazs M. Fekete;M. Meybeck;Richard B. Lammers

  • Invisible water, visible impact: groundwater use and Indian agriculture under climate change

    Esha Zaveri;Danielle S Grogan;Karen Fisher-Vanden;Steve Frolking

  • The Arctic Water Resource Vulnerability Index: An Integrated Assessment Tool for Community Resilience and Vulnerability with Respect to Freshwater

    Lilian Alessa;Lilian Alessa;Andrew Kliskey;Richard B. Lammers;Chris Arp

  • Record Russian river discharge in 2007 and the limits of analysis

    Alexander I. Shiklomanov;Richard B. Lammers

  • Scaling gridded river networks for macroscale hydrology: Development, analysis, and control of error

    Balázs M. Fekete;Charles J. Vörösmarty;Richard B. Lammers

  • Cold region river discharge uncertainty—estimates from large Russian rivers

    Alexander I. Shiklomanov;Tatyana I. Yakovleva;Richard B. Lammers;Iosiph Ph. Karasev

  • Flux of nutrients from Russian rivers to the Arctic Ocean: Can we establish a baseline against which to judge future changes?

    R. M. Holmes;B. J. Peterson;V. V. Gordeev;A. V. Zhulidov

  • Temporal and spatial variations in maximum river discharge from a new Russian data set

    Alexander I. Shiklomanov;Richard B. Lammers;M. A. Rawlins;L. C. Smith

  • EFFECTS OF LAND COVER, WATER REDISTRIBUTION, AND TEMPERATURE ON ECOSYSTEM PROCESSES IN THE SOUTH PLATTE BASIN

    Jill S. Baron;Jill S. Baron;Melannie D. Hartman;Timothy G. F. Kittel;Larry E. Band

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander I. Shiklomanov
Alexander I. Shiklomanov University of New Hampshire
Charles J. Vörösmarty
Charles J. Vörösmarty City College of New York
Steve Frolking
Steve Frolking University of New Hampshire
Balázs M. Fekete
Balázs M. Fekete City College of New York
Jill S. Baron
Jill S. Baron United States Geological Survey
Lawrence E. Band
Lawrence E. Band University of Virginia
Dominik Wisser
Dominik Wisser University of Bonn
Kyle C. McDonald
Kyle C. McDonald City College of New York
Mark C. Serreze
Mark C. Serreze University of Colorado Boulder
Timothy G. F. Kittel
Timothy G. F. Kittel University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career paths that address pressing ecological and sustainability challenges. For students seeking less intensive programs, exploring the easy bachelor degrees can provide a smoother transition into higher education while still building crucial skills.

Specialized fields such as Geoscience and Geology are highly relevant to environmental studies. Many universities now offer flexible options for these subjects through online geology degrees, enabling students to gain practical knowledge remotely.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) has become essential for environmental research and planning. Prospective students should consider the best GIS programs in the US to gain expertise in spatial data analysis and mapping technologies.

For those interested in leadership roles within environmental policy and administration, a Master of Public Administration can be invaluable. Many institutions offer accelerated options like MPA one year programs, helping professionals advance their careers without long-term disruption.

Best Scientists Citing Richard B. Lammers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles