World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
49
Citations
15391
World Ranking
5132
National Ranking
134

Reinder A. Feddes publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reinder A. Feddes sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 118 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Reinder A. Feddes D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reinder A. Feddes sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Irrigation
  • Hydrology
  • Groundwater

His primary areas of investigation include Hydrology, Soil water, Water uptake, Soil science and Pressure head. His Soil water study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Atmosphere and Plant growth. His study in Soil science is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Water balance, Sink and Evapotranspiration.

Water balance is a subfield of Geotechnical engineering that Reinder A. Feddes investigates. His Sink research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Root function, Root system and Moisture. Reinder A. Feddes incorporates Pressure head and Hydraulic conductivity in his research.

His most cited work include:

  • A remote sensing surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL)-1. Formulation (2024 citations)
  • Simulation of field water use and crop yield (1351 citations)
  • Simulation model of the water balance of a cropped soil: SWATRE (552 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Hydrology, Soil water, Soil science, Water content and Evapotranspiration. His study on Groundwater, Irrigation and Drainage is often connected to Transpiration and Pressure head as part of broader study in Hydrology. His work in the fields of Soil water, such as Hydraulic conductivity, Loam and Soil test, overlaps with other areas such as Water extraction.

His Soil science study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Water balance and Reduction. His study on Water content also encompasses disciplines like

  • Evaporation which connect with Atmospheric sciences,
  • Remote sensing and related Latent heat and Sensible heat. His work carried out in the field of Evapotranspiration brings together such families of science as Moisture and Soil physics.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Hydrology (37.63%)
  • Soil water (34.41%)
  • Soil science (26.88%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2002-2020)?

  • Hydrology (37.63%)
  • Evapotranspiration (18.28%)
  • Soil water (34.41%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His scientific interests lie mostly in Hydrology, Evapotranspiration, Soil water, Water content and Soil science. The concepts of his Hydrology study are interwoven with issues in Grassland and Soil horizon. Reinder A. Feddes merges Evapotranspiration with Simulation modeling in his study.

He has included themes like General Circulation Model and Aquifer in his Soil water study. His work in Water content addresses subjects such as Water balance, which are connected to disciplines such as Soil texture. The Hydraulic conductivity and Leaching research Reinder A. Feddes does as part of his general Soil science study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Water uptake, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science.

Between 2002 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Water productivity analysis of irrigated crops in Sirsa district, India (90 citations)
  • Parameterizing the soil - water - plant root system (83 citations)
  • Increasing water productivity of irrigated crops under limited water supply at field scale (83 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Irrigation
  • Hydrology
  • Groundwater

Reinder A. Feddes mostly deals with Hydrology, Evapotranspiration, Water content, Irrigation and Water balance. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Hydrology, Soil gradation and Hydraulic conductivity is strongly linked to Soil horizon. Reinder A. Feddes integrates many fields, such as Evapotranspiration and Land cover, in his works.

The Water content study combines topics in areas such as Sugar beet, Sowing, Fodder and Irrigation district. In his study, Remote sensing is inextricably linked to Irrigation management, which falls within the broad field of Groundwater. Reinder A. Feddes is interested in Hydrus, which is a branch of Soil water.

Best Publications

  • A remote sensing surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL)-1. Formulation

    Wim G.M. Bastiaanssen;M. Menenti;R. A. Feddes;A. A. M. Holtslag

  • Simulation of field water use and crop yield

    Reinder Auke Feddes;P. J Kowalik;H Zaradny

  • Simulation model of the water balance of a cropped soil: SWATRE

    C. Belmans;J.G. Wesseling;R.A. Feddes

  • Theory of SWAP version 2.0; simulation of water flow, solute transport and plant growth in the soil-water-atmosphere-plant environment

    J.C. van Dam;J. Huygen;J.G. Wesseling;R.A. Feddes

  • Simulation of field water uptake by plants using a soil water dependent root extraction function

    Reinder A. Feddes;Piotr Kowalik;Krystina Kolinska-Malinka;Henryk Zaradny

  • Modelling soil water dynamics in the unsaturated zone — State of the art

    R.A. Feddes;P. Kabat;P.J.T. Van Bakel;J.J.B. Bronswijk

  • Modeling Root Water Uptake in Hydrological and Climate Models

    R.A. Feddes;H. Hoff;M. Bruen;T.E. Dawson

  • Numerical simulation of infiltration, evaporation and shallow groundwater levels with the Richards equation

    J.C. van Dam;R.A. Feddes

  • Field test of a modified numerical model for water uptake by root systems

    R. A. Feddes;E. Bresler;S. P. Neuman

  • Water productivity analysis of irrigated crops in Sirsa district, India

    R. Singh;J.C. van Dam;Reinder A. Feddes

  • Simulation of root water uptake: I. Non-uniform transient salinity using different macroscopic reduction functions

    M. Homaee;C. Dirksen;R.A. Feddes

  • Biospheric Aspects of the Hydrological Cycle

    R. W. A. Hutjes;P. Kabat;Steven W. Running;W. J. Shuttleworth

  • Finite element analysis of two-dimensional flow in soils considering water uptake by roots

    Shlomo P. Neuman;Reinder A. Feddes;Eshel Bresler

  • Parameterizing the soil-water-plant root system

    R.A. Feddes;P.A.C. Raats

  • Increasing water productivity of irrigated crops under limited water supply at field scale

    M. Vazifedoust;M. Vazifedoust;J.C. van Dam;Reinder A. Feddes;M. Feizi

  • The scaling characteristics of soil parameters: From plot scale heterogeneity to subgrid parameterization

    P. Kabat;R.W.A. Hutjes;R.A. Feddes

  • A MACROSCOPIC WATER EXTRACTION MODEL FOR NONUNIFORM TRANSIENT SALINITY AND WATER STRESS

    M. Homaee;R. A. Feddes;C. Dirksen

  • Scaling up in Hydrology Using Remote Sensing

    J. B. Stewart;E. T. Engman;R. A. Feddes;Y. Kerr

  • Is large-scale inverse modelling of unsaturated flow with areal average evaporation and surface soil moisture as estimated from remote sensing feasible?

    R.A. Feddes;M. Menenti;P. Kabat;W.G.M. Bastiaanssen

  • Unsaturated-zone modeling : progress, challenges and applications

    R. A. Feddes;G. H. de Rooij;J. C. van Dam

  • Soil water content.

    P.J. van Oevelen;D.H. Hoekman;R.A. Feddes;M.L. Kavvas

Frequent Co-Authors

Pavel Kabat
Pavel Kabat Wageningen University & Research
Wim G.M. Bastiaanssen
Wim G.M. Bastiaanssen Delft University of Technology
Massimo Menenti
Massimo Menenti Delft University of Technology
Shlomo P. Neuman
Shlomo P. Neuman University of Arizona
Mehdi Homaee
Mehdi Homaee Tarbiat Modares University
Paul A. Dirmeyer
Paul A. Dirmeyer George Mason University
Andrew J. Pitman
Andrew J. Pitman University of New South Wales
Peter Droogers
Peter Droogers Stockholm Environment Institute
Holger Hoff
Holger Hoff University of Graz
Luis S. Pereira
Luis S. Pereira University of Lisbon

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their career in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can provide valuable opportunities. Many professionals consider online ed d programs without dissertation to efficiently enhance their expertise without the extensive research commitment traditionally required. These programs offer flexibility and focus on practical applications, ideal for working individuals.

Additionally, educators and environmental advocates might benefit from eds to edd bridge programs online. These pathways allow seamless progression from a master's to a doctoral degree, providing deeper knowledge and leadership skills necessary for policy development and educational roles in environmental sectors.

For those combining social aspects with environmental studies, pursuing one of the dsw online programs can open doors to roles addressing social justice and community health in environmental contexts. This holistic approach is increasingly valued in sustainability-focused careers.

Lastly, individuals seeking a broad foundation might find value in an online general studies bachelor degree cheap. These affordable degrees offer interdisciplinary skills that complement specialized environmental knowledge, aiding in versatile career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Reinder A. Feddes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles