World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Rajesh Balkrishnan publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rajesh Balkrishnan between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rajesh Balkrishnan published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 10.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2006. 8 of the 269 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2006. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 5 publications
2000 2025

269 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rajesh Balkrishnan: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 3
2002 9
2003 16
2004 16
2005 16
2006 18
2007 11
2008 12
2009 11
2010 9
2011 8
2012 11
2013 6
2014 7
2015 7
2016 14
2017 15
2018 11
2019 15
2020 16
2021 12
2022 10
2023 7
2024 3
2025 5
Total 269
Download as CSV

Rajesh Balkrishnan publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rajesh Balkrishnan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Rajesh Balkrishnan D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rajesh Balkrishnan sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Rajesh Balkrishnan is affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with notable specialization in subfields such as Oncology, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Hematology.

The main topics addressed in their scholarly work include Healthcare Policy and Management, Global Cancer Incidence and Screening, Primary Care and Health Outcomes, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research, Pain Management and Opioid Use, and Opioid Use Disorder Treatment.

Their recent publications cover a range of healthcare themes and include:

  • "Differences in Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence Among Women Residing in Urban and Rural Communities in the United States," 2021, JAMA Network Open
  • "The Growing Impact of Natural Language Processing in Healthcare and Public Health," 2024, INQUIRY The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing
  • "Barriers to Access to Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation among Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Virginia," 2021, Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
  • "Examining Rural-Urban Differences in Fatalism and Information Overload: Data from 12 NCI-Designated Cancer Centers," 2022, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
  • "Associations between initiating antihypertensive regimens on stage I-III colorectal cancer outcomes: A Medicare SEER cohort analysis," 2021, Cancer Medicine

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Rajesh Balkrishnan include Roger T. Anderson, Raj P. Desai, Jennifer M. Lobo, Hyojung Kang, and Anthony L. McCall.

Their work has been published in multiple venues, where they have contributed at least twice to several journals, including The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Reports, Health Equity, Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, and Integrative Journal of Medical Sciences.

Best Publications

  • US Renal Data System 2018 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States.

    Rajiv Saran;Bruce Robinson;Kevin C. Abbott;Lawrence Y.C. Agodoa

  • US Renal Data System 2016 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States

    Rajiv Saran;Bruce Robinson;Kevin C. Abbott;Lawrence Y.C. Agodoa

  • US Renal Data System 2015 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States.

    Rajiv Saran;Yi Li;Bruce Robinson;Kevin C. Abbott

  • US Renal Data System 2014 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States

    Rajiv Saran;Yi Li;Bruce Robinson;John Ayanian

  • US Renal Data System 2017 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States

    Rajiv Saran;Bruce Robinson;Kevin C. Abbott;Lawrence Y.C. Agodoa

  • Measuring patients' trust in their primary care providers

    Mark A. Hall;Beiyao Zheng;Elizabeth Dugan;Fabian Camacho

  • The burden of atopic dermatitis: impact on the patient, family, and society.

    Christie L. Carroll;Rajesh Balkrishnan;Steven R. Feldman M.D.;Alan B. Fleischer

  • Trust in the medical profession: conceptual and measurement issues.

    Mark A Hall;Fabian Camacho;Elizabeth Dugan;Rajesh Balkrishnan

  • Predictors of medication adherence in the elderly

    Rajesh Balkrishnan

  • Willing to wait?: The influence of patient wait time on satisfaction with primary care

    Roger T Anderson;Fabian T Camacho;Rajesh Balkrishnan

  • Predictors of medication adherence and associated health care costs in an older population with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a longitudinal cohort study.

    Rajesh Balkrishnan;Rukmini Rajagopalan;Fabian T. Camacho;Sally A. Huston

  • Outcomes Associated With Apixaban Use in Patients With End-Stage Kidney Disease and Atrial Fibrillation in the United States

    Konstantinos C. Siontis;Konstantinos C. Siontis;Xiaosong Zhang;Ashley Eckard;Nicole Bhave

  • Quality of life in patients with psoriasis.

    Monali J Bhosle;Amit Kulkarni;Steven R Feldman;Rajesh Balkrishnan

  • Relation between use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and muscle strength and physical function in older women: an observational study.

    Graziano Onder;Graziano Onder;Brenda W.J.H. Penninx;Rajesh Balkrishnan;Linda P. Fried

  • Development and validation of a health-related quality of life instrument for women with melasma.

    R. Balkrishnan;A.J. Mcmichael;F.T. Camacho;F. Saltzberg

  • Acute Kidney Injury Recovery Pattern and Subsequent Risk of CKD: An Analysis of Veterans Health Administration Data.

    Michael Heung;Diane E. Steffick;Kara Zivin;Kara Zivin;Brenda W. Gillespie

  • Stealth monitoring of adherence to topical medication: Adherence is very poor in children with atopic dermatitis

    Jennifer Krejci-Manwaring;Mark G. Tusa;Christie Carroll;Fabian Camacho

  • Stress and Adaptation in Mothers of Children With Cerebral Palsy

    Janeen Manuel;Michelle J. Naughton;Rajesh Balkrishnan;Beth Paterson Smith

  • Adherence to topical therapy decreases during the course of an 8-week psoriasis clinical trial: commonly used methods of measuring adherence to topical therapy overestimate actual use.

    Christie L Carroll;Steven R Feldman;Fabian T Camacho;Janeen C Manuel

  • US Renal Data System 2016 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States (vol 69, pg s7, 2017)

    Rajiv Saran;Bruce Robinson;Kevin C Abbott;Lawrence Yc Agodoa

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven R. Feldman
Steven R. Feldman Wake Forest University
Alan B. Fleischer
Alan B. Fleischer University of Cincinnati
John D. Piette
John D. Piette University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mark A. Hall
Mark A. Hall Wake Forest University
Richard A. Hirth
Richard A. Hirth University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Brahmajee K. Nallamothu
Brahmajee K. Nallamothu University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Richard P. Bagozzi
Richard P. Bagozzi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Hal Morgenstern
Hal Morgenstern University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
William H. Herman
William H. Herman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Paul W. Eggers
Paul W. Eggers National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative online degrees and career pathways in healthcare can offer flexible routes to fulfilling medical roles beyond the traditional MD path. For those with a non-nursing background, non nursing bachelor's to msn online programs provide a streamlined entry into advanced nursing careers, opening new doors for graduates from other fields.

If you’re seeking options with fewer admission barriers, consider applying to easy nursing schools to get into. These schools may have lower GPA requirements and more flexible prerequisites, helping more students launch their healthcare careers.

For those interested in administrative or technical roles, online schools specializing in medical billing and coding often offer accessible pathways. Many institutions provide financial aid for medical billing and coding online classes, making these programs affordable and flexible for busy learners.

Finally, prospective nursing students may want to look for a nursing school that don't require teas or similar standardized exams for admission. This can ease entry and help students focus on preparation for their future career. These varied pathways demonstrate the growing accessibility and diversity of online healthcare education.

Best Scientists Citing Rajesh Balkrishnan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles