What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Sedimentary rock
- Igneous rock
- Paleontology
His main research concerns Zircon, Geochemistry, Geochronology, Paleontology and Mineralogy.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Provenance, Detritus, Gondwana and Continental crust in addition to Zircon.
David Chew focuses mostly in the field of Geochemistry, narrowing it down to topics relating to Terrane and, in certain cases, Basement and Ophiolite.
David Chew works mostly in the field of Geochronology, limiting it down to concerns involving Igneous rock and, occasionally, Metamorphic rock and Radiogenic nuclide.
In general Mineralogy study, his work on Apatite often relates to the realm of Image resolution, thereby connecting several areas of interest.
His Apatite research includes elements of Thermochronology and Crust.
His most cited work include:
- U-Pb LA-ICPMS dating using accessory mineral standards with variable common Pb (224 citations)
- U-Pb and Th-Pb dating of apatite by LA-ICPMS (186 citations)
- U-Pb geochronologic evidence for the evolution of the Gondwanan margin of the north-central Andes (164 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
David Chew mostly deals with Geochemistry, Zircon, Paleontology, Provenance and Geochronology.
His studies in Apatite, Igneous rock, Metamorphic rock, Metamorphism and Gneiss are all subfields of Geochemistry research.
As a member of one scientific family, he mostly works in the field of Apatite, focusing on Thermochronology and, on occasion, Crust.
He works mostly in the field of Zircon, limiting it down to topics relating to Laurentia and, in certain cases, Ophiolite, as a part of the same area of interest.
In his study, Cretaceous is inextricably linked to Sedimentary rock, which falls within the broad field of Provenance.
Geochronology is often connected to Radiogenic nuclide in his work.
He most often published in these fields:
- Geochemistry (58.38%)
- Zircon (29.95%)
- Paleontology (26.40%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?
- Geochemistry (58.38%)
- Provenance (21.83%)
- Geochronology (21.83%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Geochemistry, Provenance, Geochronology, Zircon and Structural basin are his primary areas of study.
His studies in Geochemistry integrate themes in fields like Permian and Basement.
His Provenance study contributes to a more complete understanding of Paleontology.
His Geochronology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Isotope dilution, Cretaceous, Sedimentary rock, Calcite and Petrography.
His Zircon research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Devonian and Gondwana.
His research in Structural basin tackles topics such as Tectonics which are related to areas like Migmatite, Paragenesis and Magma chamber.
Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- The trace element composition of apatite and its application to detrital provenance studies (32 citations)
- Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) U–Pb carbonate geochronology: strategies, progress, and limitations (25 citations)
- Sourcing the sand: Accessory mineral fertility, analytical and other biases in detrital U-Pb provenance analysis (24 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Sedimentary rock
- Igneous rock
- Basalt
His primary scientific interests are in Geochemistry, Provenance, Zircon, Sedimentary rock and Mineral.
His research on Geochemistry often connects related areas such as Structural basin.
His study looks at the relationship between Provenance and fields such as Felsic, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems.
His research integrates issues of Heavy mineral and Detritus in his study of Zircon.
His Sedimentary rock research integrates issues from Basement and Maturity.
David Chew focuses mostly in the field of Maturity, narrowing it down to matters related to Geochronology and, in some cases, Mineralogy.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
