World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 81 16507 15526 8291 7671 486 27748

Pooja Khatri publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Pooja Khatri between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Pooja Khatri published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 19.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 50 publications in 2014. 74 of the 575 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 50. Peak 50 publications in 2014. 1996: 3 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 40 publications 2013: 47 publications 2014: 50 publications 2015: 43 publications 2016: 32 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 34 publications 2020: 37 publications 2021: 38 publications 2022: 32 publications 2023: 42 publications 2024: 38 publications 2025: 36 publications
1996 2025

575 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Pooja Khatri: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 3
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 1
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 3
2006 8
2007 5
2008 12
2009 4
2010 11
2011 14
2012 40
2013 47
2014 50
2015 43
2016 32
2017 24
2018 20
2019 34
2020 37
2021 38
2022 32
2023 42
2024 38
2025 36
Total 575
Download as CSV

Pooja Khatri publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pooja Khatri sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 481–500 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 486 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713 486
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Pooja Khatri D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pooja Khatri sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 81
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Pooja Khatri is affiliated with the University of Cincinnati in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a focus on stroke and related cerebrovascular diseases. Their body of work spans several subfields, including epidemiology, neurology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, rehabilitation, and internal medicine. The majority of their publications concentrate on acute ischemic stroke management and stroke rehabilitation.

Their main research topics include:

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Peripheral Artery Disease Management

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Eva Mistry
  • Joseph P. Broderick
  • Dawn Kleindorfer
  • Stacie L Demel
  • Brett Kissela

The prominent venues where Pooja Khatri has published are:

  • Stroke
  • Neurology
  • Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
  • International Journal of Stroke
  • The Lancet

Selected recent papers include:

  • Stroke, 2020, The Lancet
  • Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke: current status and future perspectives, 2023, The Lancet Neurology
  • Standardized Nomenclature for Modified Rankin Scale Global Disability Outcomes: Consensus Recommendations From Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable XI, 2021, Stroke
  • Factor XIa inhibition with asundexian after acute non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke (PACIFIC-Stroke): an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial, 2022, The Lancet
  • Temporal Trends in Stroke Incidence Over Time by Sex and Age in the GCNKSS, 2020, Stroke

Their scholarly output reflects a focus on clinical and therapeutic aspects of stroke, encompassing management strategies, treatment outcomes, and methodological approaches for measuring disability after stroke. The intersection of epidemiological trends and therapeutic innovation is evident in several of their recent studies.

Best Publications

  • Endovascular Therapy after Intravenous t-PA versus t-PA Alone for Stroke

    Joseph P Broderick;Yuko Y Palesch;Andrew M Demchuk;Sharon D Yeatts

  • Recommendations on Angiographic Revascularization Grading Standards for Acute Ischemic Stroke A Consensus Statement

    Osama O. Zaidat;Albert J. Yoo;Pooja Khatri;Thomas A. Tomsick

  • Age at stroke: temporal trends in stroke incidence in a large, biracial population.

    Brett M. Kissela;Jane C. Khoury;Kathleen Alwell;Charles J. Moomaw

  • European Stroke Organisation (ESO)- European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) guidelines on mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke

    Guillaume Turc;Pervinder Bhogal;Urs Fischer;Pooja Khatri

  • Good clinical outcome after ischemic stroke with successful revascularization is time-dependent

    P. Khatri;T. Abruzzo;S. D. Yeatts;C. Nichols

  • Recombinant Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator Use for Ischemic Stroke in the United States: A Doubling of Treatment Rates Over the Course of 5 Years

    Opeolu Adeoye;Richard Hornung;Pooja Khatri;Dawn Kleindorfer;Dawn Kleindorfer

  • Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy for Ischemic Stroke: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Maarten G. Lansberg;Martin J. O'Donnell;Pooja Khatri;Eddy S. Lang

  • European Stroke Organisation (ESO) – European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) Guidelines on Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischaemic StrokeEndorsed by Stroke Alliance for Europe (SAFE):

    Guillaume Turc;Pervinder Bhogal;Urs Fischer;Pooja Khatri

  • Time to angiographic reperfusion and clinical outcome after acute ischaemic stroke: an analysis of data from the Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS III) phase 3 trial

    Pooja Khatri;Sharon D Yeatts;Mikael Mazighi;Joseph P Broderick

  • Treatment and Outcome of Hemorrhagic Transformation After Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    Shadi Yaghi;Joshua Z. Willey;Brett Cucchiara;Joshua N. Goldstein

  • Stroke Incidence Is Decreasing in Whites But Not in Blacks A Population-Based Estimate of Temporal Trends in Stroke Incidence From the Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Stroke Study

    Dawn O. Kleindorfer;Jane Khoury;Charles J. Moomaw;Kathleen Alwell

  • Revascularization Results in the Interventional Management of Stroke II Trial

    T. Tomsick;J. Broderick;J. Carrozella;P. Khatri

  • Carotid Artery Stenosis as a Cause of Stroke

    Matthew L. Flaherty;Brett Kissela;Jane C. Khoury;Kathleen Alwell

  • Collaterals at Angiography and Outcomes in the Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III Trial

    David S. Liebeskind;Thomas A. Tomsick;Lydia D. Foster;Sharon D. Yeatts

  • Endovascular stent thrombectomy: the new standard of care for large vessel ischaemic stroke

    Bruce C V Campbell;Geoffrey A Donnan;Kennedy R Lees;Werner Hacke

  • Oral Antithrombotic Agents for the Prevention of Stroke in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation A Science Advisory for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    Karen L. Furie;Larry B. Goldstein;Gregory W. Albers;Pooja Khatri

  • Aspiration Thrombectomy after Intravenous Alteplase Versus Intravenous Alteplase Alone

    J Mocco;Osama O. Zaidat;Rüdiger von Kummer;Albert J. Yoo

  • Methodology of the Interventional Management of Stroke III Trial

    Pooja Khatri;Michael D. Hill;Yuko Y. Palesch;Judith Spilker

  • Warfarin use leads to larger intracerebral hematomas

    M. L. Flaherty;H. Tao;M. Haverbusch;P. Sekar

  • Population-based study of wake-up strokes

    Jason Mackey;D. Kleindorfer;H. Sucharew;C. J. Moomaw

Frequent Co-Authors

Dawn Kleindorfer
Dawn Kleindorfer University of Cincinnati
Joseph P. Broderick
Joseph P. Broderick University of Cincinnati
Brett M. Kissela
Brett M. Kissela University of Cincinnati
Jane Khoury
Jane Khoury Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Thomas A. Tomsick
Thomas A. Tomsick University of Cincinnati
David S. Liebeskind
David S. Liebeskind University of California, Los Angeles
Tudor G. Jovin
Tudor G. Jovin Cooper University Hospital
Mayank Goyal
Mayank Goyal University of Calgary
Jeffrey L Saver
Jeffrey L Saver University of California, Los Angeles
Andrew M. Demchuk
Andrew M. Demchuk University of Calgary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare but seeking flexible learning options, there are several online degrees and pathways to consider. Many registered nurses pursue adn to np bridge programs to advance their careers and gain nurse practitioner credentials while continuing to work.

Specialized fields like dietetics and wellness are also accessible, with reputable nutrition degrees online that prepare students for a range of roles in healthcare, research, and community outreach.

If you're exploring leadership or administrative opportunities in healthcare, it’s important to know how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs online. Accreditation, curriculum, and career support services make a big difference in your professional growth.

For nurses looking to upskill quickly, some schools now offer rn to bsn online programs without clinicals, allowing for greater flexibility and faster degree completion. These options can help you expand your healthcare career, even if you aren't ready to commit to med school in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Pooja Khatri

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles