World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
36
Citations
5443
World Ranking
6495
National Ranking
44

Pinchas Tamir publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pinchas Tamir sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 203 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Pinchas Tamir D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pinchas Tamir sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1977 - Palmer O. Johnson Memorial Award, American Educational Research Association

Overview

Pinchas Tamir is affiliated with the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in Israel. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a particular emphasis on Molecular Biology as a subfield. The key areas covered in their work include Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research.

Tamir has contributed to academic literature with publications found in venues such as the IASL Annual Conference Proceedings. One of their recent papers is titled "Individual Research Projects (with emphasis on Biology) Conducted by Students in Academic High Schools in Israel," published in 2021 within the same venue.

  • Individual Research Projects (with emphasis on Biology) Conducted by Students in Academic High Schools in Israel, 2021, IASL Annual Conference Proceedings

Their frequent co-authorship includes collaboration with S. Statter.

  • S. Statter

Tamir's work has been recognized in the academic community, including receiving the Palmer O. Johnson Memorial Award from the American Educational Research Association in 1977.

Best Publications

  • Subject matter and related pedagogical knowledge in teacher education

    Pinchas Tamir

  • Anthropomorphism and teleology in reasoning about biological phenomena

    Pinchas Tamir;Anat Zohar

  • Development and validation of an instrument for assessing the learning environment of outdoor science activities

    Nir Orion;Avi Hofstein;Pinchas Tamir;Geoffrey J. Giddings

  • Inquiry‐Related Tasks in High School Science Laboratory Handbooks

    Pinchas Tamir;Vincent N. Lunetta

  • The Effect of the Biology Critical Thinking Project on the Development of Critical Thinking.

    Anat Zohar;Yehudith Weinberger;Pinchas Tamir

  • STS Approach: Reasons, Intentions, Accomplishments, and Outcomes.

    Robert E. Yager;Pinchas Tamir

  • The design and use of a Practical Tests Assessment Inventory

    Pinchas Tamir;Rachel Nussinovitz;Yael Friedler

  • Professional and personal knowledge of teachers and teacher educators

    Pinchas Tamir

  • Justifying the selection of answers in multiple choice items

    Pinchas Tamir

  • High school students’ difficulties in understanding osmosis

    Yael Friedler;Ruth Amir;Pinchas Tamir

  • Training Teachers to Teach Effectively in the Laboratory.

    Pinchas Tamir

  • A Comprehensive Use of Concept Mapping in Design Instruction and Assessment

    Hanna Barenholz;Pinchas Tamir

  • In-Depth Analysis of Misconceptions as a Basis for Developing Research-Based Remedial Instruction: The Case of Photosynthesis.

    Ruth Amir;Pinchas Tamir

  • Matching Lab Activities with Teaching Goals.

    Vincent N. Lunetta;Pinchas Tamir

  • An Analysis of Laboratory Inquiries in the BSCS Yellow Version

    Pinchas Tamir;Vincent N. Lunetta

  • Inquiry and the Science Teacher.

    Pinchas Tamir

  • An Inquiry Oriented Laboratory Examination.

    Pinchas Tamir

  • Some issues related to the use of justifications to multiple-choice answers

    Pinchas Tamir

  • The relations between disciplinary and pedagogical knowledge and the length of teaching experience of biology and geography teachers

    Ron Hoz And;Ytzak Tomer;Pinchas Tamir

  • How do intermediate and junior high school students conceptualize living and nonliving

    Pinchas Tamir;Rachel Gal-Choppin;Rachel Nussinovitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Anat Zohar
Anat Zohar Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Robert E. Yager
Robert E. Yager University of Iowa
Avi Hofstein
Avi Hofstein Weizmann Institute of Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens many doors for online study and future careers. Professionals seeking advanced roles in psychology, counseling, or education often consider flexible online options. For instance, those interested in clinical psychology may pursue online psyd programs, which prepare graduates for clinical practice and licensure.

If your goal is becoming a marriage and family therapist, there are online mft programs designed for efficient completion without compromising quality. Likewise, students looking for cost-effective paths to advancement can explore an online master degree in psychology, balancing academic rigor with affordability.

For education professionals seeking leadership roles, edd programs offer opportunities to gain expertise in educational strategy and administration through accelerated, online study. These flexible degrees help students build specialized knowledge while managing work or family commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Pinchas Tamir

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles