World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
79
Citations
20963
World Ranking
4345
National Ranking
148

Philip A. Barker publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip A. Barker sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 229 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Philip A. Barker D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip A. Barker sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip A. Barker is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a specialized focus on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Neurology, Developmental Neuroscience, and Physiology.

The main topics covered in their body of work include:

  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Neurogenesis and Neuroplasticity Mechanisms
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Nerve Injury and Regeneration
  • Signaling Pathways in Disease
  • Cell Death Mechanisms and Regulation
  • Ion Channels and Receptors

Philip A. Barker has contributed to various peer-reviewed publications, collaborating frequently with researchers such as Julien Gibon, Andrés de León, Teresa Cramer, Raminder Gill, and Zahra S. Thirouin.

Their work has appeared in multiple scientific journals including:

  • eNeuro
  • Science Advances
  • Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Philip A. Barker include:

  • Cross-talk between GABAergic postsynapse and microglia regulate synapse loss after brain ischemia, 2022, Science Advances
  • NGF-Dependent and BDNF-Dependent DRG Sensory Neurons Deploy Distinct Degenerative Signaling Mechanisms, 2020, eNeuro
  • Collapsin Response Mediator Protein 4 (CRMP4) Facilitates Wallerian Degeneration and Axon Regeneration following Sciatic Nerve Injury, 2020, eNeuro
  • Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species Mediate Activation of TRPV1 and Calcium Entry Following Peripheral Sensory Axotomy, 2022, Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
  • APP Genetic Deficiency Alters Intracellular Ca2+ Homeostasis and Delays Axonal Degeneration in Dorsal Root Ganglion Sensory Neurons, 2022, Journal of Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • cIAP1 and cIAP2 Facilitate Cancer Cell Survival by Functioning as E3 Ligases that Promote RIP1 Ubiquitination

    Mathieu J.M. Bertrand;Snezana Milutinovic;Kathleen M. Dickson;Wai Chi Ho

  • Neurotrophin signaling through the p75 neurotrophin receptor.

    Philippe P Roux;Philip A Barker

  • Disruption of NGF binding to the low affinity neurotrophin receptor p75LNTR reduces NGF binding to TrkA on PC12 cells.

    Philip A. Barker;Eric M. Shooter

  • Impact of lower atmospheric carbon dioxide on tropical mountain ecosystems

    F. Alayne Street-Perrott;Yongsong Huang;R. Alan Perrott;Geoffrey Eglinton

  • De novo mutations in the gene encoding the synaptic scaffolding protein SHANK3 in patients ascertained for schizophrenia

    Julie Gauthier;Nathalie Champagne;Ronald G. Lafrenière;Lan Xiong

  • Multiple Sclerosis: Fas Signaling in Oligodendrocyte Cell Death

    Sameer D. D'Souza;Bruno Bonetti;Vijayabalan Balasingam;Neil R. Cashman

  • Constitutive Nuclear Factor-κB Activity Is Required for Central Neuron Survival

    Asha L. Bhakar;Laura-Lee Tannis;Christine Zeindler;Maria Pia Russo

  • Vasculature Guides Migrating Neuronal Precursors in the Adult Mammalian Forebrain via Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Signaling

    Marina Snapyan;Morgane Lemasson;Monika S. Brill;Mathieu Blais

  • The MAGE proteins: emerging roles in cell cycle progression, apoptosis, and neurogenetic disease.

    Philip A. Barker;Amir Salehi

  • Detection of brain-derived neurotrophic factor-like activity in fibroblasts and Schwann cells: inhibition by antibodies to NGF.

    Ann Acheson;Philip A. Barker;Ralph F. Alderson;Freda D. Miller

  • Cellular Inhibitors of Apoptosis cIAP1 and cIAP2 Are Required for Innate Immunity Signaling by the Pattern Recognition Receptors NOD1 and NOD2

    Mathieu J.M. Bertrand;Karine Doiron;Katherine Labbé;Robert G. Korneluk

  • NRAGE, a novel MAGE protein, interacts with the p75 neurotrophin receptor and facilitates nerve growth factor-dependent apoptosis.

    Amir H Salehi;Philippe P Roux;Chris J Kubu;Christine Zeindler

  • p75NTR is positively promiscuous: Novel partners and new insights

    Philip A Barker

  • Nuclear factor kB signaling regulates neuronal morphology and cocaine reward

    Scott J. Russo;Matthew B. Wilkinson;Michelle S. Mazei-Robison;David M. Dietz

  • p75 neurotrophin receptor expression is induced in apoptotic neurons after seizure.

    Philippe P. Roux;Michael A. Colicos;Philip A. Barker;Timothy E. Kennedy

  • A high-resolution paleoclimate record spanning the past 25,000 years in southern East Africa.

    Thomas C. Johnson;Erik T. Brown;James McManus;Sylvia Barry

  • Transgenic Mice Expressing the Intracellular Domain of the p75 Neurotrophin Receptor Undergo Neuronal Apoptosis

    Marta Majdan;Christian Lachance;Andrew Gloster;Raquel Aloyz

  • Tissue-specific alternative splicing generates two isoforms of the trkA receptor.

    P.A. Barker;C. Lomen-Hoerth;E.M. Gensch;S.O. Meakin

  • Biogenic silica: a neglected component of the coupled global continental biogeochemical cycles of carbon and silicon

    F. Alayne Street-Perrott;Philip A. Barker

  • Experimental dissolution of diatom silica in concentrated salt solutions and implications for paleoenvironmental reconstruction

    Philip Barker;Jean-Charles Fontes;FranÇoise Gasse

Frequent Co-Authors

Melanie J. Leng
Melanie J. Leng University of Nottingham
F. Alayne Street-Perrott
F. Alayne Street-Perrott Swansea University
Richard J. Telford
Richard J. Telford University of Bergen
Hilary J. Sloane
Hilary J. Sloane British Geological Survey
Neil Roberts
Neil Roberts Plymouth University
Philippe Séguéla
Philippe Séguéla Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Philippe P. Roux
Philippe P. Roux University of Montreal
David Williamson
David Williamson Institut de Recherche pour le Développement
Eric M. Shooter
Eric M. Shooter Stanford University
Françoise Gasse
Françoise Gasse Aix-Marseille University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry opens a world of career possibilities, especially with the flexibility of online programs. Many professionals continue their education to advance in healthcare, research, or laboratory settings. For example, registered nurses can pursue the best online rn to bsn programs to move into more specialized clinical or leadership roles.

If you’re interested in healthcare administration, consider an accelerated healthcare management degree online. This pathway prepares graduates for fast-paced roles managing hospitals, clinics, or research labs.

For those drawn to mental health, the fastest psych np program enables biology graduates with nursing backgrounds to become psychiatric nurse practitioners, addressing vital mental wellness needs.

Additional options like nutrition degree programs are in high demand for those interested in dietetics and preventative healthcare. With online study, you can tailor your learning and career goals to the ever-evolving landscape of science and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Philip A. Barker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles