World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
77
Citations
32553
World Ranking
1244
National Ranking
662

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
81
Citations
38708
World Ranking
3791
National Ranking
1875

Peter D. Karp publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter D. Karp sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 210 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Peter D. Karp D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter D. Karp sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Peter D. Karp is affiliated with SRI International in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with significant contributions in molecular biology, genetics, biomedical engineering, ecology, and renewable energy, sustainability, and the environment.

The scientist's work covers multiple topics, including:

  • Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Peter D. Karp has published extensively across several journals. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Microbiology
  • mSystems
  • Database
  • mBio

Among the frequent co-authors collaborating with this researcher are:

  • Suzanne Paley
  • Ron Caspi
  • Markus Krummenacker
  • Wai Kit Ong
  • Lisa R. Moore

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Peter D. Karp include:

  • Pathway size matters: the influence of pathway granularity on over-representation (enrichment analysis) statistics, 2021, BMC Genomics
  • SBML Level 3: an extensible format for the exchange and reuse of biological models, 2020, Molecular Systems Biology
  • The EcoCyc Database in 2021, 2021, Frontiers in Microbiology
  • Plant Metabolic Network 15: A resource of genome-wide metabolism databases for 126 plants and algae, 2021, Journal of Integrative Plant Biology
  • Simultaneous cross-evaluation of heterogeneous E. coli datasets via mechanistic simulation, 2020, Science

Peter D. Karp was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2014.

Best Publications

  • The complete genome sequence of the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori

    Jean-F. Tomb;Owen White;Anthony R. Kerlavage;Rebecca A. Clayton

  • The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases

    Ron Caspi;Richard Billington;Luciana Ferrer;Hartmut Foerster

  • A genome-scale metabolic reconstruction for Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 that accounts for 1260 ORFs and thermodynamic information.

    Adam M Feist;Christopher S Henry;Jennifer L Reed;Markus Krummenacker

  • The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes - a 2019 update.

    Ron Caspi;Richard Billington;Ingrid M. Keseler;Anamika Kothari

  • The Genome of the Natural Genetic Engineer Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58

    Derek W. Wood;Joao C. Setubal;Rajinder Kaul;Dave E. Monks

  • EcoCyc: a comprehensive database resource for Escherichia coli

    Ingrid M. Keseler;Julio Collado-Vides;Socorro Gama-Castro;John Ingraham

  • The BioCyc collection of microbial genomes and metabolic pathways.

    Peter D Karp;Richard Billington;Ron Caspi;Carol A Fulcher

  • The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes.

    Ron Caspi;Richard Billington;Carol A. Fulcher;Ingrid M. Keseler

  • The Pathway Tools software.

    Peter D. Karp;Suzanne M. Paley;Pedro Romero

  • The BioPAX community standard for pathway data sharing

    Emek Demir;Emek Demir;Michael P. Cary;Suzanne Paley;Ken Fukuda

  • Expansion of the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases to 160 genomes

    Peter D. Karp;Christos A. Ouzounis;Caroline Moore-Kochlacs;Leon Goldovsky

  • EcoCyc: fusing model organism databases with systems biology

    Ingrid M. Keseler;Amanda Mackie;Martín Peralta-Gil;Alberto Santos-Zavaleta

  • Pathway Tools version 13.0: integrated software for pathway/genome informatics and systems biology

    Peter D. Karp;Suzanne M. Paley;Markus Krummenacker;Mario Latendresse

  • Computational prediction of human metabolic pathways from the complete human genome

    Pedro Romero;Pedro Romero;Jonathan Wagg;Michelle L Green;Dale Kaiser

  • The EcoCyc Database

    Peter D. Karp;Monica Riley;Milton Saier;Ian T. Paulsen

  • EcoCyc: a comprehensive database of Escherichia coli biology

    Ingrid M. Keseler;Julio Collado-Vides;Alberto Santos-Zavaleta;Martín Peralta-Gil

  • MetaCyc: a multiorganism database of metabolic pathways and enzymes

    Ron Caspi;Hartmut Foerster;Carol A. Fulcher;Rebecca Hopkinson

  • The EcoCyc database: reflecting new knowledge about Escherichia coli K-12.

    Ingrid M. Keseler;Amanda Mackie;Alberto Santos-Zavaleta;Richard Billington

  • The complete genome sequence of Francisella tularensis, the causative agent of tularemia.

    Pär Larsson;Petra C F Oyston;Patrick Chain;May C Chu

  • The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of Pathway/Genome Databases

    Unknown

  • OKBC: a programmatic foundation for knowledge base interoperability

    Vinay K. Chaudhri;Adam Farquhar;Richard Fikes;Peter D. Karp

Frequent Co-Authors

Suzanne M. Paley
Suzanne M. Paley SRI International
Markus Krummenacker
Markus Krummenacker SRI International
Ian T. Paulsen
Ian T. Paulsen Macquarie University
Julio Collado-Vides
Julio Collado-Vides National Autonomous University of Mexico
Pedro Romero
Pedro Romero University of Lausanne
Pardis C. Sabeti
Pardis C. Sabeti Harvard University
Chris Sander
Chris Sander Harvard University
Christos A. Ouzounis
Christos A. Ouzounis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Edgar Wingender
Edgar Wingender University of Göttingen
Peter D'Eustachio
Peter D'Eustachio New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a range of flexible study options and career opportunities. Many students now seek the fastest online degree programs, motivated by the potential to enter the tech workforce quickly and start earning sooner.

Specializations like artificial intelligence are increasingly accessible through distance learning. For those interested in emerging fields, pursuing an online ai degree can be a smart and affordable way to build expertise in cutting-edge technology.

Deciding on the right program in college is crucial. Consider degree options with high employment rates and strong industry demand to maximize your future prospects.

For working professionals, choosing the easiest masters degree to get online can offer a balance of career advancement and manageable coursework.

Best Scientists Citing Peter D. Karp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles