World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Paul J. Leibson

Paul J. Leibson

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
59
Citations
10741
World Ranking
12717
National Ranking
5423

Paul J. Leibson publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul J. Leibson sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 101 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Paul J. Leibson D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul J. Leibson sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul J. Leibson was affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States during their scientific career.

While specific details on recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, and book publications are not available, the professional profile indicates a background connected to medical or clinical research, given the primary affiliation with a major clinical institution.

As no detailed information on fields or subfields of study or main research topics is provided, it is not possible to outline the specific academic disciplines or areas of scientific inquiry addressed in their work.

The absence of listed awards suggests that no formal recognitions or honors have been recorded in the available data.

Paul J. Leibson is noted as deceased.

Best Publications

  • NKG2D-DAP10 triggers human NK cell–mediated killing via a Syk-independent regulatory pathway

    Daniel D Billadeau;Jadee L Upshaw;Renee A Schoon;Christopher J Dick

  • Upregulation of Fas ligand expression by human immunodeficiency virus in human macrophages mediates apoptosis of uninfected T lymphocytes.

    Andrew D. Badley;Julie A. McElhinny;Paul J. Leibson;David H. Lynch

  • Signal transduction during natural killer cell activation: inside the mind of a killer.

    Paul J Leibson

  • Genetic Evidence for Differential Coupling of Syk Family Kinases to the T-Cell Receptor: Reconstitution Studies in a ZAP-70-Deficient Jurkat T-Cell Line

    Brandi L. Williams;Kathy L. Schreiber;Weiguo Zhang;Ronald L. Wange

  • Vav1 Dephosphorylation by the Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-1 as a Mechanism for Inhibition of Cellular Cytotoxicity

    Christopher C. Stebbins;Carsten Watzl;Daniel D. Billadeau;Paul J. Leibson

  • Sequential Involvement of Lck and SHP-1 with MHC-Recognizing Receptors on NK Cells Inhibits FcR-Initiated Tyrosine Kinase Activation

    Bryce A. Binstadt;Kathryn M. Brumbaugh;Christopher J. Dick;Andrew M. Scharenberg

  • NKG2D-mediated signaling requires a DAP10-bound Grb2-Vav1 intermediate and phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase in human natural killer cells

    Jadee L Upshaw;Laura N Arneson;Renee A Schoon;Christopher J Dick

  • Formins regulate the actin-related protein 2/3 complex-independent polarization of the centrosome to the immunological synapse.

    Timothy S. Gomez;Karan Kumar;Ricardo B. Medeiros;Yoji Shimizu

  • Comparison of Apoptosis in Wild-Type and Fas-Resistant Cells: Chemotherapy-Induced Apoptosis Is Not Dependent on Fas/Fas Ligand Interactions

    Christine M. Eischen;Timothy J. Kottke;Timothy J. Kottke;Luis M. Martins;Luis M. Martins;Guriqbal S. Basi;Guriqbal S. Basi

  • Killer Cell Activating Receptors Function as Costimulatory Molecules on CD4+CD28null T Cells Clonally Expanded in Rheumatoid Arthritis

    Takashi Namekawa;Melissa R. Snyder;Jeng Hsien Yen;Brenda E. Goehring

  • Macrophage-dependent Apoptosis of CD4+ T Lymphocytes from HIV-infected Individuals Is Mediated by FasL and Tumor Necrosis Factor

    Andrew D. Badley;David Dockrell;Margaret Simpson;Ron Schut

  • ITAMs versus ITIMs: striking a balance during cell regulation

    Daniel D. Billadeau;Paul J. Leibson

  • Natural killer cell activation in mice and men: different triggers for similar weapons?

    Francesco Colucci;James P. Di Santo;Paul J. Leibson

  • Effects of p56lck deficiency on the growth and cytolytic effector function of an interleukin-2-dependent cytotoxic T-cell line.

    Larry Karnitz;Shari L. Sutor;Toshihiko Torigoe;John C. Reed

  • Tyrosine kinase activation provides an early and requisite signal for Fas-induced apoptosis.

    C M Eischen;C J Dick;P J Leibson

  • Functional role for Syk tyrosine kinase in natural killer cell-mediated natural cytotoxicity

    K. M. Brumbaugh;B. A. Binstadt;D. D. Billadeau;R. A. Schoon

  • The Vav–Rac1 Pathway in Cytotoxic Lymphocytes Regulates the Generation of Cell-mediated Killing

    Daniel D. Billadeau;Kathryn M. Brumbaugh;Christopher J. Dick;Renee A. Schoon

  • Fc receptor stimulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in natural killer cells is associated with protein kinase C-independent granule release and cell-mediated cytotoxicity.

    Joy D. Bonnema;Larry M. Karnitz;Renee A. Schoon;Robert T. Abraham

  • Demonstration of aberrant T-cell and natural killer-cell antigen expression in all cases of granular lymphocytic leukaemia.

    William G. Morice;Paul J. Kurtin;Paul J. Leibson;Ayalew Tefferi

  • Fc gamma receptor activation induces the tyrosine phosphorylation of both phospholipase C (PLC)-gamma 1 and PLC-gamma 2 in natural killer cells.

    Adrian T. Ting;Larry M. Karnitz;Renee A. Schoon;Robert T. Abraham

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert T. Abraham
Robert T. Abraham Pfizer (United States)
Carlos V. Paya
Carlos V. Paya Eli Lilly (United States)
Larry M. Karnitz
Larry M. Karnitz Mayo Clinic
David H. Lynch
David H. Lynch ApoVax, Inc.
David J. McKean
David J. McKean Mayo Clinic
Weiguo Zhang
Weiguo Zhang Duke University
Lawrence E. Samelson
Lawrence E. Samelson National Institutes of Health
Zhenkun Lou
Zhenkun Lou Mayo Clinic
Dan S. Kaufman
Dan S. Kaufman University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry opens the door to a wide range of online degrees and professional opportunities in the health and science fields. Many top universities now offer flexible, accredited programs to help students advance without disrupting their current schedules.

Interested in leadership roles within healthcare? Consider online doctoral programs healthcare administration to prepare for executive positions in health systems and policy organizations. For those focused on pharmaceuticals or clinical practice, pharm d online programs provide advanced training for pharmacy careers in both clinical and research settings.

If you’re drawn to human movement or sports science, you might explore an online exercise physiology degree to build expertise in fitness, rehabilitation, or athletic performance. Alternatively, those seeking a broader approach to physical health may consider the best online kinesiology degree, focusing on movement science, wellness, and health promotion.

These online programs offer convenience, diverse career pathways, and a chance to specialize your biology or biochemistry background for unique roles in the rising health sciences sector.

Best Scientists Citing Paul J. Leibson