World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Patrick Doherty

Patrick Doherty

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
6756
World Ranking
8878
National Ranking
65

Patrick Doherty publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Doherty sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 246 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Patrick Doherty D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Doherty sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patrick Doherty is a researcher affiliated with Linköping University in Sweden. Their work primarily spans the fields of Computer Science and Engineering, with a strong focus on several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computer Networks and Communications, Aerospace Engineering, and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

Their research covers a range of topics, prominently featuring:

  • AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
  • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
  • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies

Patrick Doherty has contributed to multiple publication venues with notable frequency, including:

  • Autonomous Intelligent Systems
  • Arthritis Research & Therapy
  • International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
  • Information Sciences
  • Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems

Some of their recent papers are:

  • Hastily formed knowledge networks and distributed situation awareness for collaborative robotics (2021), Autonomous Intelligent Systems
  • Router and gateway node placement in wireless mesh networks for emergency rescue scenarios (2021), Autonomous Intelligent Systems
  • WARA-PS: a research arena for public safety demonstrations and autonomous collaborative rescue robotics experimentation (2021), Autonomous Intelligent Systems
  • Deconvolution of whole blood transcriptomics identifies changes in immune cell composition in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) treated with mycophenolate mofetil (2023), Arthritis Research & Therapy
  • Rough set reasoning using answer set programs (2020), International Journal of Approximate Reasoning

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Mariusz Wzorek
  • Cyrille Berger
  • Piotr Rudol
  • Andrzej Szałas
  • Niels Peek

Patrick Doherty's research engages with topics related to reasoning methods such as rough set theory and logic programming, collaborative robotics and situational awareness, as well as biomedical informatics focusing on immune cell composition in systemic lupus erythematosus. Their work intersects theoretical aspects and applied domains, contributing to areas such as autonomous agent systems, network design for emergency scenarios, and knowledge representation.

Best Publications

  • A UAV search and rescue scenario with human body detection and geolocalization

    Patrick Doherty;Piotr Rudol

  • Human Body Detection and Geolocalization for UAV Search and Rescue Missions Using Color and Thermal Imagery

    P. Rudol;P. Doherty

  • An Integrated UAV Navigation System Based on Aerial Image Matching

    G. Conte;P. Doherty

  • The WITAS Unmanned Aerial Vehicle project

    Patrick Doherty;Gösta Granlund;Krzystof Kuchcinski;Erik Sandewall

  • Vision-based unmanned aerial vehicle navigation using geo-referenced information

    Gianpaolo Conte;Patrick Doherty

  • TALplanner: A temporal logic based forward chaining planner

    Jonas Kvarnström;Patrick Doherty

  • Computing Circumscription Revisited: A Reduction Algorithm

    Patrick Doherty;Witold Łukaszewicz;Andrzej Szałas

  • A temporal logic-based planning and execution monitoring framework for unmanned aircraft systems

    Patrick Doherty;Jonas Kvarnström;Fredrik Heintz

  • The SHERPA project: Smart collaboration between humans and ground-aerial robots for improving rescuing activities in alpine environments

    L. Marconi;C. Melchiorri;M. Beetz;D. Pangercic

  • (TAL) temporal action logics : Language specification and tutorial.

    Patrick Doherty;Joakim Gustafsson;Lars Karlsson;Jonas Kvarnström

  • NML3 : a non-monotonic formalism with explicit defaults

    Patrick Doherty

  • Relay Positioning for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Surveillance

    Oleg Burdakov;Patrick Doherty;Kaj Holmberg;Jonas Kvarnström

  • A Distributed Architecture for Autonomous Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Experimentation

    Patrick Doherty;Patrik Haslum;Fredrik Heintz;Torsten Merz

  • TALPLANNER A Temporal Logic-Based Planner

    Patrick Doherty;Jonas Kvarnström

  • Probabilistic roadmap based path planning for an autonomous unmanned helicopter

    Per Olof Pettersson;Patrick Doherty

  • From images to traffic behavior - A UAV tracking and monitoring application

    F. Heintz;P. Rudol;P. Doherty

  • Embracing occlusion in specifying the indirect effects of actions

    Joakim Gustafsson;Patrick Doherty

  • Reconfigurable path planning for an autonomous unmanned aerial vehicle

    Mariusz Wzorek;Patrick Doherty

  • Advanced research with autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles

    Patrick Doherty

  • Reasoning about action and change using occlusion

    Patrick Doherty

  • Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning

    Patrick Doherty;John Mylopoulos;Christopher Welty

  • Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    Luc De Raedt;Christian Bessiere;Didier Dubois;Patrick Doherty

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrzej Skowron
Andrzej Skowron University of Warsaw
Joachim Hertzberg
Joachim Hertzberg Osnabrück University
John-Jules Ch. Meyer
John-Jules Ch. Meyer Utrecht University
Johan Wiklund
Johan Wiklund Syracuse University
Oliver Lemon
Oliver Lemon Heriot-Watt University
Fahad Shahbaz Khan
Fahad Shahbaz Khan Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence
Michael Felsberg
Michael Felsberg Linköping University
John J. McCarthy
John J. McCarthy University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering your options for studying Computer Science in the USA? It’s worth exploring alternative and flexible online degree pathways. Many prospective students are attracted to the fastest masters degree online programs, which allow you to earn a graduate degree quickly—sometimes in as little as one year. This accelerated route can help you enter or advance in the tech workforce sooner.

Additionally, technology is among the most in demand masters degrees fields, opening diverse and lucrative career opportunities. If you prefer a shorter commitment, an associate's degree online offers a practical first step, with immediate job prospects or a pathway to further study.

For budget-conscious learners, it’s useful to compare the cheapest online college options. These affordable programs make quality education more accessible, helping you minimize debt while building a strong foundation for your tech career.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick Doherty

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles