World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
5390
World Ranking
10824
National Ranking
4505

Nicolas Villar publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicolas Villar sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 127 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Nicolas Villar D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicolas Villar sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nicolas Villar is affiliated with Microsoft in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with particular focus on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Neurology, Sociology and Political Science, and Rehabilitation.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Diabetes Management and Research
  • Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
  • Crime Patterns and Interventions

Their recent publications illustrate a multidisciplinary approach to these subjects. The list of notable papers includes:

  • Non-invasive intervention for motor signs of Parkinson's disease: the effect of vibratory stimuli, 2020, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
  • Somatosensory and dynamic balance improvement in older adults with diabetic peripheral neuropathy through sensorimotor exercise: A multisite randomized controlled trial, 2024, Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies
  • Crime and Commerce: A Study of Urban Crime and Criminal Activity in Chicago, 2020, Knowledge@UChicago (University of Chicago)
  • P-030. GANANCIA PONDERAL DURANTE EL EMBARAZO EN PACIENTES CON DIABETES PREGESTACIONAL: ASOCIACIÓN CON RESULTADOS MATERNOS Y NEONATALES, 2025, Endocrinología Diabetes y Nutrición
  • P-050. RESULTADOS DE ADHERENCIA AL SEGUIMIENTO DEL PROGRAMA DE TRANSICIÓN DE DIABETES EN UN HOSPITAL DE TERCER NIVEL A LO LARGO 5 AÑOS, 2025, Endocrinología Diabetes y Nutrición

Frequent co-authors in their research indicate ongoing collaboration and include:

  • B. Barquiel Alcalá
  • Orlando Domínguez
  • E. García Pérez de Sevilla
  • Patricia Vázquez Pérez
  • Neus Gadea

Their work has appeared in multiple journals and venues, reflecting diverse research interests. Frequent publication venues are:

  • Endocrinología Diabetes y Nutrición
  • Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
  • Knowledge@UChicago (University of Chicago)
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Best Publications

  • The drift table: designing for ludic engagement

    William W. Gaver;John Bowers;Andrew Boucher;Hans Gellerson

  • PreHeat: controlling home heating using occupancy prediction

    James Scott;A.J. Bernheim Brush;John Krumm;Brian Meyers

  • MixFab: a mixed-reality environment for personal fabrication

    Christian Weichel;Manfred Lau;David Kim;Nicolas Villar

  • Going beyond the display: a surface technology with an electronically switchable diffuser

    Shahram Izadi;Steve Hodges;Stuart Taylor;Dan Rosenfeld

  • Surface computer user interaction

    Shahram Izadi;Nicolas Villar;Otmar Hilliges;Stephen E. Hodges

  • Detecting touch on a curved surface

    Daniel Rosenfeld;Jonathan Westhues;Shahram Izadi;Nicolas Villar

  • The VoodooIO gaming kit: a real-time adaptable gaming controller

    Nicolas Villar;Kiel Mark Gilleade;Devina Ramdunyellis;Hans Gellersen

  • Enabling Collaboration in Learning Computer Programing Inclusive of Children with Vision Impairments

    Anja Thieme;Cecily Morrison;Nicolas Villar;Martin Grayson

  • Ferromagnetic user interfaces

    Stuart Taylor;Jonathan Hook;Shahram Izadi;Nicolas Villar

  • Prototyping Connected Devices for the Internet of Things

    S. Hodges;S. Taylor;N. Villar;J. Scott

  • .NET gadgeteer: a platform for custom devices

    Nicolas Villar;James Scott;Steve Hodges;Kerry Hammil

  • Mouse 2.0: multi-touch meets the mouse

    Nicolas Villar;Shahram Izadi;Dan Rosenfeld;Hrvoje Benko

  • Project Zanzibar: A Portable and Flexible Tangible Interaction Platform

    Nicolas Villar;Daniel Cletheroe;Greg Saul;Christian Holz

  • How to nudge in Situ: designing lambent devices to deliver salient information in supermarkets

    Vaiva Kalnikaite;Yvonne Rogers;Jon Bird;Nicolas Villar

  • Circuit stickers: peel-and-stick construction of interactive electronic prototypes

    Steve Hodges;Nicolas Villar;Nicholas Chen;Tushar Chugh

  • Pin&Play: the surface as network medium

    K. Van Laerhoven;N. Villar;A. Schmidt;H.-W. Gellersen

  • Exploring Issues of User Model Transparency and Proactive Behaviour in an Office Environment Control System

    Keith Cheverst;Hee Eon Byun;Dan Fitton;Corina Sas

  • FM radio: family interplay with sonic mementos

    Daniela Petrelli;Nicolas Villar;Vaiva Kalnikaite;Lina Dib

  • Putting the physical into the digital: issues in designing hybrid interactive surfaces

    David Kirk;Abigail Sellen;Stuart Taylor;Nicolas Villar

  • Socio-Technical Lifelogging: Deriving Design Principles for a Future Proof Digital Past

    Steve Whittaker;Vaiva Kalnikaité;Daniela Petrelli;Abigail Sellen

  • Optimizing 3d printing using segmentation or aggregation

    David Alexander Butler;Nicolas Villar;James W. Scott;Stephen E. Hodges

Frequent Co-Authors

James Scott
James Scott Microsoft (United States)
Stephen E. Hodges
Stephen E. Hodges Microsoft (United States)
Shahram Izadi
Shahram Izadi Google (United States)
Hans Gellersen
Hans Gellersen Aarhus University
Hrvoje Benko
Hrvoje Benko Facebook (United States)
Shwetak N. Patel
Shwetak N. Patel University of Washington
Desney S. Tan
Desney S. Tan Microsoft (United States)
Christian Holz
Christian Holz ETH Zurich
Dan Morris
Dan Morris Google (United States)
Kristof Van Laerhoven
Kristof Van Laerhoven University of Siegen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a Computer Science degree in the USA opens up a wide range of related online degree programs and flexible career pathways. If you’re interested in expanding your expertise, options like mechanical engineering or environmental science are worth exploring. Top choices may include an online degree for mechanical engineering, which can provide highly marketable engineering skills.

Cost is a key concern for many. Budget-conscious students should check out the cheapest online environmental science degree to minimize expenses without sacrificing quality. Additionally, accelerated programs are becoming more popular. You might be interested in a computer science accelerated program if you want to fast-track your studies and enter the workforce sooner.

Beyond Computer Science, students can also capitalize on diverse job prospects with interdisciplinary backgrounds. For example, you can discover what can you do with an environmental studies degree to broaden your career options in sustainability, research, and technology. These alternative and affordable online pathways let you tailor your education to your unique career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Nicolas Villar

Trending Scientists