World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 40 9033 8778 3839 3685 118 14896

James H. Martin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James H. Martin between 1952 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James H. Martin published across 75 years, from 1952 to 2026, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2021. 9 of the 231 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1952 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2021. 1952: 1 publication 1953: 0 publications 1954: 0 publications 1955: 1 publication 1956: 1 publication 1957: 0 publications 1958: 3 publications 1959: 2 publications 1960: 1 publication 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 1 publication 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 4 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 25 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 4 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 6 publications 2026: 3 publications
1952 2026

231 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James H. Martin: publications per year, 1952 to 2026
Year Publications
1952 1
1953 0
1954 0
1955 1
1956 1
1957 0
1958 3
1959 2
1960 1
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 1
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 2
1971 0
1972 0
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 1
1987 4
1988 1
1989 0
1990 2
1991 2
1992 5
1993 0
1994 1
1995 3
1996 2
1997 2
1998 1
1999 3
2000 3
2001 2
2002 1
2003 1
2004 4
2005 6
2006 3
2007 13
2008 19
2009 9
2010 13
2011 15
2012 9
2013 5
2014 3
2015 3
2016 4
2017 3
2018 11
2019 10
2020 9
2021 25
2022 1
2023 4
2024 6
2025 6
2026 3
Total 231
Download as CSV

James H. Martin publications per year - data summary

  • James H. Martin, a Computer Science scholar from University of Colorado Boulder, has 231 publications recorded across 75 years, from 1952 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1952 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2021, with 25 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1952, 1955, 1956, 1960 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 27 of the 75 years in the span carry no publications at all (1953, 1954, 1957, 1961 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.8 per year counting only the 48 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 20 publications, 9% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1952-1976: 13 publications (0.5 per year); 1977-2001: 32 publications (1.3 per year); 2002-2026: 186 publications (7.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

James H. Martin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James H. Martin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 112–121 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 118 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497 118
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

James H. Martin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • James H. Martin, a Computer Science scholar from University of Colorado Boulder, records 118 publications - the 14th percentile of the discipline.
  • 14% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than James H. Martin, and about 86% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and James H. Martin ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

James H. Martin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James H. Martin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907 40
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

James H. Martin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • James H. Martin, a Computer Science scholar from University of Colorado Boulder, records 40 D-Index - the 37th percentile of the discipline.
  • 37% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than James H. Martin, and about 63% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and James H. Martin ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

James H. Martin is affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a particular emphasis on emergency medicine, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, and clinical psychology.

The scientist's work addresses a range of topics including:

  • Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Emergency and acute care studies
  • Trauma and emergency care studies
  • Child nutrition and water access
  • Maternal and perinatal health interventions
  • Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout
  • Global maternal and child health

James H. Martin has contributed to various publication venues, frequently publishing in:

  • BMJ Open
  • Frontiers in Public Health
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • New England Journal of Medicine
  • The Lancet Global Health

Recent papers by Martin include:

  • Randomized Trial of Early Detection and Treatment of Postpartum Hemorrhage, 2023, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Protective factors and sources of support in the workplace as experienced by UK foundation and junior doctors: a qualitative study, 2021, BMJ Open
  • Sources of work-related psychological distress experienced by UK-wide foundation and junior doctors: a qualitative study, 2021, BMJ Open
  • Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of The Daily Mile on childhood weight outcomes and wellbeing: a cluster randomised controlled trial, 2020, International Journal of Obesity
  • Reducing Medical Admissions and Presentations Into Hospital through Optimising Medicines (REMAIN HOME): a stepped wedge, cluster randomised controlled trial, 2021, The Medical Journal of Australia

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Karla Hemming (19 co-authored works)
  • Ioannis Gallos (13 co-authored works)
  • Adam Devall (11 co-authored works)
  • Hadiza Galadanci (10 co-authored works)
  • Fadhlun M. Alwy Al-beity (10 co-authored works)

Best Publications

  • Speech and Language Processing

    Dan Jurafsky;James H. Martin

  • Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition

    Daniel Jurafsky;James H. Martin

  • Shallow Semantic Parsing using Support Vector Machines.

    Sameer S. Pradhan;Wayne H. Ward;Kadri Hacioglu;James H. Martin

  • Natural Language Processing to the Rescue? Extracting "Situational Awareness" Tweets During Mass Emergency.

    Sudha Verma;Sarah Vieweg;William J. Corvey;Leysia Palen

  • A vision for technology-mediated support for public participation & assistance in mass emergencies & disasters

    Leysia Palen;Kenneth M. Anderson;Gloria Mark;James Martin

  • Support Vector Learning for Semantic Argument Classification

    Sameer Pradhan;Kadri Hacioglu;Valerie Krugler;Wayne Ward

  • Speech and Language Processing, 2nd Edition

    Daniel Jurafsky;James H. Martin

  • A Computational Model of Metaphor Interpretation

    James H. Martin

  • The Berkeley UNIX Consultant Project

    Robert Wilensky;David N. Chin;Marc Luria;James Martin

  • NLP to the Rescue?: Extracting "Situational Awareness" Tweets During Mass Emergency

    Sudha Verma;Sarah Vieweg;William Corvey;Leysia Palen

  • Semantic Role Labeling Using Different Syntactic Views

    Sameer Pradhan;Wayne Ward;Kadri Hacioglu;James Martin

  • Towards Robust Semantic Role Labeling

    Sameer Pradhan;Sameer Pradhan;Wayne Ward;Wayne Ward;James Martin;James Martin

  • Evidence-based static branch prediction using machine learning

    Brad Calder;Dirk Grunwald;Michael Jones;Donald Lindsay

  • Towards comprehensive syntactic and semantic annotations of the clinical narrative.

    Daniel Albright;Arrick Lanfranchi;Anwen Fredriksen;William F. Styler

  • Semantic Role Labeling by Tagging Syntactic Chunks

    Kadri Hacioglu;Sameer Pradhan;Wayne H. Ward;James H. Martin

  • Semantic role parsing: adding semantic structure to unstructured text

    Sameer Pradhan;K. Hacioglu;W. Ward;J.H. Martin

  • Learning Semantic Links from a Corpus of Parallel Temporal and Causal Relations

    Steven Bethard;James H. Martin

  • SGRank: Combining Statistical and Graphical Methods to Improve the State of the Art in Unsupervised Keyphrase Extraction

    Soheil Danesh;Tamara Sumner;James H. Martin

  • Identification of Event Mentions and their Semantic Class

    Steven Bethard;James H. Martin

  • Recognizing entailment in intelligent tutoring systems

    Rodney d. Nielsen;Wayne Ward;James h. Martin

  • Expressing rhetorical relations in instructional text: a case study of the purpose relation

    Keith Vander Linden;James H. Martin

Frequent Co-Authors

Wayne H. Ward
Wayne H. Ward University of Colorado Boulder
Steven Bethard
Steven Bethard University of Arizona
Martha Palmer
Martha Palmer University of Colorado Boulder
Dan Jurafsky
Dan Jurafsky Stanford University
Sameer Pradhan
Sameer Pradhan Vassar College
Qutayba Hamid
Qutayba Hamid University of Sharjah
Guergana Savova
Guergana Savova Harvard University
Dekai Wu
Dekai Wu Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Leysia Palen
Leysia Palen University of Colorado Boulder
Dirk Grunwald
Dirk Grunwald University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying Computer Science in the USA, there are several related online degrees and career pathways worth considering. Fields like engineering, data science, and physics offer overlapping skills and academic foundations, expanding your career opportunities.

Many students explore online mechanical engineering degrees to build expertise in systems design, automation, and robotics—areas closely connected to computer science innovation. Similarly, a strong foundation in physical sciences can be gained by enrolling in the best online physics degree programs, ideal for those whose interests span computation, analytics, and scientific research.

For those focused on data-centric careers, pursuing data science degrees provides access to skills in big data, machine learning, and analytics—all complementing core computer science competencies. Additionally, graduates aiming for roles in technology and infrastructure often seek programs ranked among the best for online electrical engineering degree ranking.

Exploring these online degrees broadens your academic journey and prepares you for versatile, high-demand technology careers across industries.

Best Scientists Citing James H. Martin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles