World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
74
Citations
22524
World Ranking
5533
National Ranking
2628

Neil R. Hackett publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil R. Hackett sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 228 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Neil R. Hackett D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil R. Hackett sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Neil R. Hackett is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their research spans key areas in biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, with a focus on physiology, molecular biology, genetics, and cellular and molecular neuroscience. Hackett's work also touches on epidemiology.

The primary research topics include lysosomal storage disorders, virus-based gene therapy, RNA regulation and disease, adenosine and purinergic signaling, CRISPR and genetic engineering, nuclear receptors and signaling, and cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research.

Hackett has published in several scientific venues. Frequent publication outlets include Molecular Therapy and Human Gene Therapy, each hosting three of their works. Other venues include Science Translational Medicine, EMBO Molecular Medicine, and Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development.

  • Slowing late infantile Batten disease by direct brain parenchymal administration of a rh.10 adeno-associated virus expressing CLN2, 2020, Science Translational Medicine
  • Pre-clinical development of AP4B1 gene replacement therapy for hereditary spastic paraplegia type 47, 2024, EMBO Molecular Medicine
  • Combination HSCT and intravenous AAV-mediated gene therapy in a canine model proves pivotal for translation of Krabbe disease therapy, 2023, Molecular Therapy
  • AAVrh.10 delivery of novel APOE2-Christchurch variant suppresses amyloid and Tau pathology in Alzheimer's disease mice, 2024, Molecular Therapy
  • Twenty-Year Survival Analysis of Adeno-Associated Virus Vector Serotype 2-Mediated Gene Therapy to the Central Nervous System for CLN2 Disease, 2025, Human Gene Therapy

Frequent collaborators in Hackett's research include Ronald G. Crystal, Dolan Sondhi, Stephen M. Kaminsky, Jonathan B. Rosenberg, and Philip L. Leopold.

Best Publications

  • Impaired recruitment of bone-marrow–derived endothelial and hematopoietic precursor cells blocks tumor angiogenesis and growth

    David Lyden;Koichi Hattori;Koichi Hattori;Sergio Dias;Carla Costa

  • Recruitment of Stem and Progenitor Cells from the Bone Marrow Niche Requires MMP-9 Mediated Release of Kit-Ligand

    Beate Heissig;Koichi Hattori;Sergio Dias;Matthias Friedrich

  • Angiogenesis Gene Therapy Phase I Assessment of Direct Intramyocardial Administration of an Adenovirus Vector Expressing VEGF121 cDNA to Individuals With Clinically Significant Severe Coronary Artery Disease

    Todd K. Rosengart;Leonard Y. Lee;Shailen R. Patel;Timothy A. Sanborn

  • Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Angiopoietin-1 Stimulate Postnatal Hematopoiesis by Recruitment of Vasculogenic and Hematopoietic Stem Cells

    Koichi Hattori;Sergio Dias;Beate Heissig;Neil R. Hackett

  • Chemokine-mediated interaction of hematopoietic progenitors with the bone marrow vascular niche is required for thrombopoiesis.

    Scott T. Avecilla;Koichi Hattori;Beate Heissig;Rafael Tejada

  • Placental growth factor reconstitutes hematopoiesis by recruiting VEGFR1 + stem cells from bone-marrow microenvironment

    Koichi Hattori;Beate Heissig;Yan Wu;Sergio Dias

  • Cytokine-mediated deployment of SDF-1 induces revascularization through recruitment of CXCR4+ hemangiocytes

    David K Jin;Koji Shido;Hans-Georg Kopp;Isabelle Petit

  • Plasma elevation of stromal cell-derived factor-1 induces mobilization of mature and immature hematopoietic progenitor and stem cells.

    Koichi Hattori;Beate Heissig;Kei Tashiro;Tasuku Honjo

  • Treatment of late infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis by CNS administration of a serotype 2 adeno-associated virus expressing CLN2 cDNA.

    Stefan Worgall;Dolan Sondhi;Neil R. Hackett;Barry Kosofsky

  • Biologic bypass with the use of adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of the complementary deoxyribonucleic acid for vascular endothelial growth factor 121 improves myocardial perfusion and function in the ischemic porcine heart

    Charles A. Mack;Shailen R. Patel;Eric A. Schwarz;Pat Zanzonico

  • Fluorescent virions: dynamic tracking of the pathway of adenoviral gene transfer vectors in living cells

    Philip L. Leopold;Barbara Ferris;Irene Grinberg;Stefan Worgall

  • Neurotrophins promote revascularization by local recruitment of TrkB+ endothelial cells and systemic mobilization of hematopoietic progenitors

    Pouneh Kermani;Dahlia Rafii;David K. Jin;Paul Whitlock

  • Six-month assessment of a phase I trial of angiogenic gene therapy for the treatment of coronary artery disease using direct intramyocardial administration of an adenovirus vector expressing the VEGF121 cDNA.

    Todd K. Rosengart;Leonard Y. Lee;Shailen R. Patel;Paul D. Kligfield

  • Variability of Antioxidant-Related Gene Expression in the Airway Epithelium of Cigarette Smokers

    Neil R. Hackett;Adriana Heguy;Ben-Gary Harvey;Timothy P. O'Connor

  • Circumvention of Anti-Adenovirus Neutralizing Immunity by Administration of an Adenoviral Vector of an Alternate Serotype

    Charles A. Mack;Wen-Ru Song;Heather Carpenter;Tom J. Wickham

  • Airway epithelial CFTR mRNA expression in cystic fibrosis patients after repetitive administration of a recombinant adenovirus

    B G Harvey;P L Leopold;N R Hackett;T M Grasso

  • Regional suppression of tumor growth by in vivo transfer of a cDNA encoding a secreted form of the extracellular domain of the flt-1 vascular endothelial growth factor receptor.

    Hwai-Loong Kong;Dalit Hecht;Wenru Song;Imre Kovesdi

  • CAR-dependent and CAR-independent pathways of adenovirus vector–mediated gene transfer and expression in human fibroblasts

    Chisa Hidaka;Eric Milano;Philip L. Leopold;Jeffrey M. Bergelson

  • Fiber swap between adenovirus subgroups B and C alters intracellular trafficking of adenovirus gene transfer vectors.

    Naoki Miyazawa;Philip L. Leopold;Neil R. Hackett;Barbara Ferris

  • Variability of Human Systemic Humoral Immune Responses to Adenovirus Gene Transfer Vectors Administered to Different Organs

    Ben-Gary Harvey;Neil R. Hackett;Tarek El-Sawy;Todd K. Rosengart

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald G. Crystal
Ronald G. Crystal Cornell University
Shahin Rafii
Shahin Rafii Cornell University
Philip L. Leopold
Philip L. Leopold Cornell University
James M. Wilson
James M. Wilson University of Pennsylvania
Malcolm A.S. Moore
Malcolm A.S. Moore Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Barry E. Kosofsky
Barry E. Kosofsky Cornell University
Fan Zhang
Fan Zhang University of British Columbia
David Lyden
David Lyden Cornell University
Daniel A. Peterson
Daniel A. Peterson Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to various career options, especially in healthcare and life sciences. For those seeking advanced roles in administration, a cheap online MBA healthcare administration program can provide essential leadership and management skills without a hefty tuition fee.

Technical careers are also in demand, especially in health information management. Acquiring a cpc certification helps professionals validate their skills in medical coding and often leads to increased job opportunities.

Compensation is a critical consideration. The certified medical coder salary can be quite competitive, with experienced individuals earning more as demand for accurate billing rises.

While technology evolves, questions arise about job stability in medical coding. It's worth exploring if is medical coding a dying career, to understand industry trends and make informed decisions when mapping your career path.

Best Scientists Citing Neil R. Hackett

Trending Scientists