World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 79 1204 1081 539 458 217 26193

Leo M. Schouls publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Leo M. Schouls between 1980 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Leo M. Schouls published across 45 years, from 1980 to 2024, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2001. 6 of the 222 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2001. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 6 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 2 publications
1980 2024

222 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Leo M. Schouls: publications per year, 1980 to 2024
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 1
1984 0
1985 2
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 7
1990 1
1991 1
1992 1
1993 0
1994 5
1995 1
1996 6
1997 7
1998 8
1999 12
2000 11
2001 13
2002 7
2003 10
2004 7
2005 6
2006 9
2007 7
2008 3
2009 6
2010 5
2011 5
2012 7
2013 5
2014 7
2015 10
2016 6
2017 3
2018 2
2019 3
2020 12
2021 10
2022 8
2023 4
2024 2
Total 222
Download as CSV

Leo M. Schouls publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leo M. Schouls sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 215–224 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 217 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198 217
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Leo M. Schouls D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leo M. Schouls sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59 79
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Leo M. Schouls is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research predominantly spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Medicine, with specific focus on subfields such as Molecular Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, and Endocrinology.

The scientist's main topics of study include Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria, Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus, Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing, Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing, Streptococcal Infections and Treatments, Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts, and Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections.

Schouls has contributed to multiple papers published in notable venues. Some recent publications include:

  • "bla OXA-48-like genome architecture among carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in the Netherlands" (2021, Microbial Genomics)
  • "Cross-border spread of blaNDM-1- and blaOXA-48-positive Klebsiella pneumoniae: a European collaborative analysis of whole genome sequencing and epidemiological data, 2014 to 2019" (2020, Eurosurveillance)
  • "Dominance of M1UK clade among Dutch M1 Streptococcus pyogenes" (2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases)
  • "National surveillance pilot study unveils a multicenter, clonal outbreak of VIM-2-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa ST111 in the Netherlands between 2015 and 2017" (2021, Scientific Reports)
  • "Plasmid diversity among genetically related Klebsiella pneumoniae blaKPC-2 and blaKPC-3 isolates collected in the Dutch national surveillance" (2020, Scientific Reports)

Frequent publication venues for Schouls include Communications Medicine, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Scientific Reports, Eurosurveillance, and Clinical Microbiology and Infection.

The scientist has collaborated regularly with several coauthors, identified by the highest number of joint publications. These frequently include Sandra Witteveen, Antoni P. A. Hendrickx, Daan W. Notermans, Fabian Landman, and Karin van Dijk.

Best Publications

  • Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology.

    J Kamerbeek;L Schouls;A Kolk;M van Agterveld

  • Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes.

    Ruud. Jansen;Jan. D. A. van Embden;Wim. Gaastra;Leo. M. Schouls

  • GP5+/6+ PCR followed by Reverse Line Blot Analysis Enables Rapid and High-Throughput Identification of Human Papillomavirus Genotypes

    Adriaan J. C. van den Brule;René Pol;Nathalie Fransen-Daalmeijer;Leo M. Schouls

  • Amplified-Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis: the State of an Art

    P. H. M. Savelkoul;H. J. M. Aarts;J. de Haas;L. Dijkshoorn

  • Simultaneous detection of bovine Theileria and Babesia species by reverse line blot hybridization.

    J. M. Gubbels;A. P. de Vos;M. van der Weide;J. Viseras

  • Detection and identification of Ehrlichia, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, and Bartonella species in Dutch Ixodes ricinus ticks.

    Leo M. Schouls;Ingrid Van De Pol;Sjoerd G. T. Rijpkema;Corrie S. Schot

  • The carbapenem inactivation method (CIM), a simple and low-cost alternative for the Carba NP test to assess phenotypic carbapenemase activity in gram-negative rods.

    Kim van der Zwaluw;Angela de Haan;Gerlinde N. Pluister;Hester J. Bootsma

  • A novel pathogenic taxon of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, Canetti: characterization of an exceptional isolate from Africa.

    D. Van Soolingen;T. Hoogenboezem;P. E. W. De Haas;P. W. M. Hermans

  • Molecular typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on the basis of protein A gene polymorphism

    H. M. E. Frénay;A. E. Bunschoten;L. M. Schouls;W. J. van Leeuwen

  • Simultaneous detection and genotyping of three genomic groups of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in Dutch Ixodes ricinus ticks by characterization of the amplified intergenic spacer region between 5S and 23S rRNA genes.

    S. G. T. Rijpkema;M. J. C. H. Molkenboer;L. M. Schouls;F. Jongejan

  • Presence of bacterial DNA and bacterial peptidoglycans in joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other arthritides.

    I M van der Heijden;B Wilbrink;I Tchetverikov;I A Schrijver

  • Genetic Variation and Evolutionary Origin of the Direct Repeat Locus of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Bacteria

    J. D. A. van Embden;T. van Gorkom;K. Kremer;R. Jansen

  • Comparative Genotyping of Campylobacter jejuni by Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism, Multilocus Sequence Typing, and Short Repeat Sequencing: Strain Diversity, Host Range, and Recombination

    Leo M. Schouls;Sanne Reulen;Birgitta Duim;Jaap A. Wagenaar

  • Bordetella pertussis, the Causative Agent of Whooping Cough, Evolved from a Distinct, Human-Associated Lineage of B. bronchiseptica

    Dimitri A Diavatopoulos;Craig A Cummings;Craig A Cummings;Leo M Schouls;Mary M Brinig;Mary M Brinig

  • Identification of Ehrlichia spp. and Borrelia burgdorferi in Ixodes ticks in the Baltic regions of Russia.

    Andrey N. Alekseev;Helen V. Dubinina;Ingrid V. A. N. De Pol;Leo M. Schouls

  • Pitfalls and fallacies of cat scratch disease serology: evaluation of Bartonella henselae-based indirect fluorescence assay and enzyme-linked immunoassay.

    A. M. C. Bergmans;M. F. Peeters;J. F. P. Schellekens;M. C. Vos

  • Predominance of two Bartonella henselae variants among cat-scratch disease patients in the Netherlands.

    A. M. C. Bergmans;J. F. P. Schellekens;J. D. A. Van Embden;L. M. Schouls

  • Discrimination of epidemic and nonepidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains on the basis of protein A gene polymorphism.

    H. M. E. Frenay;J. P. G. Theelen;L. M. Schouls;C. M. J. E. Vandenbroucke-Grauls

  • Detection of Borrelia afzelii, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto, Borrelia garinii and group VS116 by PCR in skin biopsies of patients with erythema migrans and acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans.

    Sjoerd G.T. Rijpkema;Dig J. Tazelaar;Marc J.C.H. Molkenboer;Gerda T. Noordhoek

  • Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying the novel mecC gene in Denmark corroborates a zoonotic reservoir with transmission to humans

    A Petersen;Mikael Ruge Stegger;O Heltberg;J Christensen

  • Identification of a novel family of sequence repeats among prokaryotes.

    Rund Jansen;Jam D.A. van Embden;Wim Gaastra;Leo M. Schouls

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Kluytmans
Jan Kluytmans Utrecht University
Arie van der Ende
Arie van der Ende University of Amsterdam
Guy A. M. Berbers
Guy A. M. Berbers University of Minnesota
Frits R. Mooi
Frits R. Mooi National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM)
Hajo Grundmann
Hajo Grundmann University of Freiburg
Birgitta Duim
Birgitta Duim Utrecht University
Jan Jacobs
Jan Jacobs KU Leuven
J. D. A. Van Embden
J. D. A. Van Embden National Institute for Public Health and the Environment
Paul H. M. Savelkoul
Paul H. M. Savelkoul Maastricht University
Elisabeth A. M. Sanders
Elisabeth A. M. Sanders Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond microbiology, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities in the healthcare and medical fields. Programs like the shortest online medical billing and coding certificate programs offer a quick pathway for certification, providing foundational skills for medical administration roles.

Additionally, a variety of online healthcare degrees exist that cater to different career goals, including nursing, health informatics, and public health, allowing flexibility for working professionals.

For those interested in public health, some of the best easiest MPH online programs to get into provide accessible options to gain advanced knowledge and leadership skills, enhancing career prospects in community health and epidemiology.

Graduates with a background in biology or healthcare might also consider becoming a child life specialist, a rewarding role that supports children through medical experiences. Understanding the child life specialist salary with bachelor degree highlights the potential financial benefits and career viability in this field.

Best Scientists Citing Leo M. Schouls

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles