World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Monica P. Colaiácovo

Monica P. Colaiácovo

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
43
Citations
10560
World Ranking
4279
National Ranking
1847

Monica P. Colaiácovo publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Monica P. Colaiácovo sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 104 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Monica P. Colaiácovo D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Monica P. Colaiácovo sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Monica P. Colaiácovo is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research work primarily focuses on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a significant emphasis on molecular biology and aging. The body of work spans several intersecting fields including health, toxicology and mutagenesis, public health, environmental and occupational health, as well as endocrine and autonomic systems.

The scientist's research covers diverse topics within the life sciences. Key themes include genetics, aging, and longevity in model organisms; DNA repair mechanisms; mitochondrial function and pathology; epigenetics and DNA methylation; effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals; reproductive biology and fertility; and circadian rhythm and melatonin.

Monica P. Colaiácovo has contributed to various frequently appearing publication venues throughout their career. These include:

  • PLoS Genetics
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Current Biology
  • iScience
  • Genetics

Recent papers authored by this researcher exemplify the range of their scientific focus:

  • "Multivalent weak interactions between assembly units drive synaptonemal complex formation" (2020, The Journal of Cell Biology)
  • "Crossover Position Drives Chromosome Remodeling for Accurate Meiotic Chromosome Segregation" (2020, Current Biology)
  • "Environmentally-relevant exposure to diethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) alters regulation of double-strand break formation and crossover designation leading to germline dysfunction in Caenorhabditis elegans" (2020, PLoS Genetics)
  • "SnapShot: Meiosis - Prophase I" (2020, Cell)
  • "ATM/ATR kinases link the synaptonemal complex and DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice" (2022, Current Biology)

Collaborative efforts form an important part of Monica P. Colaiácovo's research. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Laura I. Láscarez-Lagunas
  • Marina Martínez-García
  • Saravanapriah Nadarajan
  • Nara Shin
  • Rajendiran Karthikraj

Best Publications

  • Reversal of Histone Lysine Trimethylation by the JMJD2 Family of Histone Demethylases

    Johnathan R. Whetstine;Amanda Nottke;Fei Lan;Maite Huarte

  • Heritable genome editing in C. elegans via a CRISPR-Cas9 system.

    Ari E Friedland;Yonatan B Tzur;Kevin M Esvelt;Monica P Colaiácovo

  • REST and stress resistance in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease

    Tao Lu;Liviu Aron;Joseph Zullo;Ying Pan

  • A chromatin localization screen reveals poly (ADP ribose)-regulated recruitment of the repressive polycomb and NuRD complexes to sites of DNA damage

    Danny M. Chou;Brittany Susan Adamson;Noah E. Dephoure;Xu Tan

  • Synapsis-dependent and -independent mechanisms stabilize homolog pairing during meiotic prophase in C. elegans

    Amy J. MacQueen;Mónica P. Colaiácovo;Kent McDonald;Anne M. Villeneuve

  • Synaptonemal complex assembly in C. elegans is dispensable for loading strand-exchange proteins but critical for proper completion of recombination.

    Mónica P. Colaiácovo;Amy J. MacQueen;Enrique Martinez-Perez;Kent McDonald

  • Role of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2 and Msh3 Repair Proteins in Double-Strand Break-Induced Recombination

    Neal Sugawara;Frédéric Pâques;Mónica Colaiácovo;James E. Haber

  • A Genetic Screen Identifies FAN1, a Fanconi Anemia-Associated Nuclease Necessary for DNA Interstrand Crosslink Repair

    Agata Smogorzewska;Agata Smogorzewska;Agata Smogorzewska;Rohini Desetty;Takamune T. Saito;Michael Schlabach

  • Developmental roles of the histone lysine demethylases

    Amanda Nottke;Mónica P. Colaiácovo;Yang Shi

  • Regulation of lifespan by neural excitation and REST

    Joseph M. Zullo;Derek Drake;Liviu Aron;Patrick O’Hern

  • Transgene-mediated cosuppression in the C. elegans germ line

    Abby F. Dernburg;Jonathan Zalevsky;Mónica P. Colaiácovo;Anne M. Villeneuve

  • A histone methylation network regulates transgenerational epigenetic memory in C. elegans.

    Eric L. Greer;Sara E. Beese-Sims;Emily Brookes;Emily Brookes;Ruggero Spadafora

  • Bisphenol A impairs the double-strand break repair machinery in the germline and causes chromosome abnormalities

    Patrick Allard;Monica P. Colaiácovo

  • Crossing over is coupled to late meiotic prophase bivalent differentiation through asymmetric disassembly of the SC

    Kentaro Nabeshima;Anne M. Villeneuve;Monica P. Colaiácovo;Monica P. Colaiácovo

  • Heritable Custom Genomic Modifications in Caenorhabditis elegans via a CRISPR-Cas9 System

    Yonatan B Tzur;Ari E Friedland;Saravanapriah Nadarajan;George M Church;George M Church

  • LAB-1 antagonizes the Aurora B kinase in C. elegans.

    Carlos Egydio de Carvalho;Sophie Zaaijer;Sarit Smolikov;Yanjie Gu

  • SYP-3 restricts synaptonemal complex assembly to bridge paired chromosome axes during meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Sarit Smolikov;Andreas Eizinger;Kristina Schild-Prufert;Allison Hurlburt

  • Meiotic development in Caenorhabditis elegans

    Doris Y. Lui;Monica P. Colaiácovo

  • Distribution of meiotic recombination events: talking to your neighbors.

    Enrique Martinez-Perez;Monica P Colaiácovo

  • Caenorhabditis elegans HIM-18/SLX-4 interacts with SLX-1 and XPF-1 and maintains genomic integrity in the germline by processing recombination intermediates.

    Takamune T. Saito;Jillian L. Youds;Simon J. Boulton;Monica P. Colaiácovo

Frequent Co-Authors

Anne M. Villeneuve
Anne M. Villeneuve Stanford University
Kurunthachalam Kannan
Kurunthachalam Kannan University at Albany, State University of New York
George M. Church
George M. Church Harvard University
Yang Shi
Yang Shi University of Oxford
Kent L. McDonald
Kent L. McDonald University of California, Berkeley
Ambrosius P. Snijders
Ambrosius P. Snijders The Francis Crick Institute
J. Wade Harper
J. Wade Harper Harvard Medical School
Agata Smogorzewska
Agata Smogorzewska Rockefeller University
Bruce A. Yankner
Bruce A. Yankner Harvard University
Stephen J. Elledge
Stephen J. Elledge Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those passionate about Genetics, there are several related online degrees and career pathways worth considering. Many genetics students also explore overlapping fields, such as Nursing and Advanced Practice, to broaden their career prospects and make impactful contributions in healthcare and research.

If you’re interested in combining genetics expertise with clinical care, online NP programs can offer a flexible route to becoming a Nurse Practitioner. These programs blend advanced science knowledge with practical skills for direct patient care.

Cost is often a key consideration. Prospective students should explore how much is online nursing school to compare tuition rates and affordable options. Similarly, those already holding a nursing background may find the cheapest online rn to bsn programs particularly helpful for career advancement.

For specialized leadership roles or those seeking the highest level of clinical practice, the cheapest dnp programs can provide advanced training at competitive tuition costs. By understanding these pathways and their affordability, you can align your genetics background with meaningful, in-demand professions.

Best Scientists Citing Monica P. Colaiácovo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles