World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 33 10504 9829 5519 5037 97 5035

Mir M. Ali publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mir M. Ali between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mir M. Ali published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 7.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2019. 11 of the 149 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2019. 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 6 publications
2007 2025

149 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mir M. Ali: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 2
2008 1
2009 2
2010 4
2011 10
2012 4
2013 3
2014 3
2015 7
2016 7
2017 11
2018 16
2019 20
2020 16
2021 10
2022 12
2023 10
2024 5
2025 6
Total 149
Download as CSV

Mir M. Ali publications per year - data summary

  • Mir M. Ali, a Psychology scholar from National Institute on Aging, has 149 publications recorded across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2007 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2019, with 20 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2008, with 1 publication.
  • The rate of publication averages 7.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 7.8 per year counting only the 19 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 43 publications, 29% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2007-2013: 26 publications (3.7 per year); 2014-2020: 80 publications (11.4 per year); 2021-2025: 43 publications (8.6 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Mir M. Ali publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mir M. Ali sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 97 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 97
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mir M. Ali publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Mir M. Ali, a Psychology scholar from National Institute on Aging, records 97 publications - the 18th percentile of the discipline.
  • 18% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Mir M. Ali, and about 82% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Mir M. Ali ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Mir M. Ali D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mir M. Ali sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 33
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Mir M. Ali D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Mir M. Ali, a Psychology scholar from National Institute on Aging, records 33 D-Index - the 10th percentile of the discipline.
  • 10% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Mir M. Ali, and about 90% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Mir M. Ali ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Mir M. Ali is affiliated with the National Institute on Aging in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on public health issues within medicine, with particular expertise in opioid use disorder treatment, prenatal substance exposure effects, and substance abuse treatment and outcomes.

Their work covers several specialized areas including:

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • General Health Professions
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Epidemiology

Mir M. Ali has contributed to numerous publications in the following journals:

  • Psychiatric Services
  • JAMA Pediatrics
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
  • Endocrine Practice
  • General Hospital Psychiatry

Their recent published papers include:

  • Substance Use Disorder Treatment, Perceived Need for Treatment, and Barriers to Treatment Among Parenting Women With Substance Use Disorder in US Rural Counties, 2020, The Journal of Rural Health
  • National trends in buprenorphine prescribing before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2022, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Coauthors frequently collaborating with Mir M. Ali are:

  • Kristina West
  • Maria X. Sanmartin
  • Priscilla Novak
  • Ryan Mutter
  • Timothy B. Creedon

The main topics of Mir M. Ali's research address:

  • Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research

Among their notable papers are:

  • Association Between State-Level Criminal Justice-Focused Prenatal Substance Use Policies in the US and Substance Use-Related Foster Care Admissions and Family Reunification, 2020, JAMA Pediatrics
  • Substance Use Disorder Treatment, Perceived Need for Treatment, and Barriers to Treatment Among Parenting Women With Substance Use Disorder in US Rural Counties, 2020, The Journal of Rural Health
  • Increases in Providers With Buprenorphine Waivers in the United States From 2016 to 2019, 2020, Psychiatric Services
  • National trends in buprenorphine prescribing before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2022, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
  • Characteristics and Prescribing Patterns of Clinicians Waivered to Prescribe Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder Before and After Release of New Practice Guidelines, 2023, JAMA Health Forum

Best Publications

  • Prevalence and Treatment of Depression, Anxiety, and Conduct Problems in US Children.

    Reem M. Ghandour;Laura J. Sherman;Catherine J. Vladutiu;Mir M. Ali

  • Utilization of Mental Health Services in Educational Setting by Adolescents in the United States

    Mir M Ali;Kristina West;Judith L Teich;Sean Lynch

  • Social network effects in alcohol consumption among adolescents.

    Mir M. Ali;Debra S. Dwyer

  • Estimating peer effects in sexual behavior among adolescents.

    Mir M. Ali;Debra S. Dwyer

  • Estimating peer effects in adolescent smoking behavior: a longitudinal analysis.

    Mir M. Ali;Debra S. Dwyer

  • Weight-related behavior among adolescents: the role of peer effects.

    Mir M. Ali;Mir M. Ali;Aliaksandr Amialchuk;Frank W. Heiland

  • Prescription drug monitoring programs, nonmedical use of prescription drugs, and heroin use: Evidence from the National Survey of Drug Use and Health.

    Mir M. Ali;William N. Dowd;Timothy Classen;Ryan Mutter

  • Using social media to monitor mental health discussions - evidence from Twitter.

    Chandler McClellan;Mir M Ali;Ryan Mutter;Larry Kroutil

  • Body weight, self-perception and mental health outcomes among adolescents.

    Mir M Ali;Hai Fang;John A Rizzo

  • Post-Discharge Treatment Engagement Among Patients with an Opioid-Use Disorder.

    Sarah Naeger;Ryan Mutter;Mir M. Ali;Tami Leigh Mark

  • Adolescent propensity to engage in health risky behaviors: the role of individual resilience.

    Mir M. Ali;Debra S. Dwyer;Elizabeth A. Vanner;Alexander Lopez

  • The Role of Perceived Need and Health Insurance in Substance Use Treatment: Implications for the Affordable Care Act☆

    Mir M. Ali;Judith L. Teich;Ryan Mutter

  • Behavioral health treatment utilization among individuals with co-occurring opioid use disorder and mental illness: Evidence from a national survey.

    Priscilla Novak;Kenneth A. Feder;Mir M. Ali;Jie Chen

  • The Social Contagion Effect of Marijuana Use among Adolescents

    Mir M. Ali;Mir M. Ali;Aliaksandr Amialchuk;Debra S. Dwyer

  • Reasons for Not Seeking Substance Use Disorder Treatment: Variations by Health Insurance Coverage.

    Mir M Ali;Judith L Teich;Ryan Mutter

  • Substance use disorder treatment admissions and state-level prenatal substance use policies: Evidence from a national treatment database

    Katy B. Kozhimannil;William N. Dowd;Mir M. Ali;Priscilla Novak

  • Social Network and Weight Misperception among Adolescents

    Mir M. Ali;Aliaksandr Amialchuk;Francesco Renna

  • Big and Beautiful? Evidence of Racial Differences in the Perceived Attractiveness of Obese Females.

    Mir M. Ali;John A. Rizzo;Frank W. Heiland

  • The influence of body weight on social network ties among adolescents

    Mir M. Ali;Aliaksandr Amialchuk;John A. Rizzo

  • The Implications of the Affordable Care Act for Behavioral Health Services Utilization.

    Mir M. Ali;Judith Teich;Albert Woodward;Beth Han

  • Utilization of Mental Health Services by Veterans Living in Rural Areas.

    Judith Teich;Mir M. Ali;Sean Lynch;Ryan Mutter

  • Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act: Potential Changes in Receipt of Mental Health Treatment Among Low-Income Nonelderly Adults With Serious Mental Illness

    Beth Han;Joe Gfroerer;S. Janet Kuramoto;Mir Ali

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel I. Rees
Daniel I. Rees University of Colorado Denver
Samuel H. Zuvekas
Samuel H. Zuvekas Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Elizabeth J. Letourneau
Elizabeth J. Letourneau Johns Hopkins University
Colleen L. Barry
Colleen L. Barry Johns Hopkins University
Holly C. Wilcox
Holly C. Wilcox Johns Hopkins University
Alex H. Kral
Alex H. Kral RTI International
Elizabeth A. Stuart
Elizabeth A. Stuart Johns Hopkins University
Corey S. Davis
Corey S. Davis East Carolina University
Kosali Simon
Kosali Simon Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a degree in psychology can open the door to diverse and rewarding career options, both in clinical and non-clinical fields. One popular career pathway is to become a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), which requires specific educational and state licensing requirements. For example, in Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh mft education requirements focus on completing a master’s degree and supervised experience before obtaining licensure.

Prospective therapists in Texas can learn more about how to become an mft in Plano, including coursework, exams, and clinical practice. Similarly, those interested in Florida can review the mft requirements in Port St. Lucie for state-specific guidance.

Online psychology degrees also allow flexibility for students looking to pursue licensure in different states. If you’re planning to practice in Oregon, see the steps on how to become an mft in Portland. No matter where you live, understanding local requirements and selecting an accredited program is crucial to advancing your career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Mir M. Ali

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles