World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
5035
World Ranking
10504
National Ranking
5519

Mir M. Ali publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mir M. Ali sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 97 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mir M. Ali D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mir M. Ali sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mir M. Ali is affiliated with the National Institute on Aging in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on public health issues within medicine, with particular expertise in opioid use disorder treatment, prenatal substance exposure effects, and substance abuse treatment and outcomes.

Their work covers several specialized areas including:

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • General Health Professions
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Epidemiology

Mir M. Ali has contributed to numerous publications in the following journals:

  • Psychiatric Services
  • JAMA Pediatrics
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
  • Endocrine Practice
  • General Hospital Psychiatry

Their recent published papers include:

  • Substance Use Disorder Treatment, Perceived Need for Treatment, and Barriers to Treatment Among Parenting Women With Substance Use Disorder in US Rural Counties, 2020, The Journal of Rural Health
  • National trends in buprenorphine prescribing before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2022, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Coauthors frequently collaborating with Mir M. Ali are:

  • Kristina West
  • Maria X. Sanmartin
  • Priscilla Novak
  • Ryan Mutter
  • Timothy B. Creedon

The main topics of Mir M. Ali's research address:

  • Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research

Among their notable papers are:

  • Association Between State-Level Criminal Justice-Focused Prenatal Substance Use Policies in the US and Substance Use-Related Foster Care Admissions and Family Reunification, 2020, JAMA Pediatrics
  • Substance Use Disorder Treatment, Perceived Need for Treatment, and Barriers to Treatment Among Parenting Women With Substance Use Disorder in US Rural Counties, 2020, The Journal of Rural Health
  • Increases in Providers With Buprenorphine Waivers in the United States From 2016 to 2019, 2020, Psychiatric Services
  • National trends in buprenorphine prescribing before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2022, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
  • Characteristics and Prescribing Patterns of Clinicians Waivered to Prescribe Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder Before and After Release of New Practice Guidelines, 2023, JAMA Health Forum

Best Publications

  • Prevalence and Treatment of Depression, Anxiety, and Conduct Problems in US Children.

    Reem M. Ghandour;Laura J. Sherman;Catherine J. Vladutiu;Mir M. Ali

  • Utilization of Mental Health Services in Educational Setting by Adolescents in the United States

    Mir M Ali;Kristina West;Judith L Teich;Sean Lynch

  • Social network effects in alcohol consumption among adolescents.

    Mir M. Ali;Debra S. Dwyer

  • Estimating peer effects in sexual behavior among adolescents.

    Mir M. Ali;Debra S. Dwyer

  • Estimating peer effects in adolescent smoking behavior: a longitudinal analysis.

    Mir M. Ali;Debra S. Dwyer

  • Weight-related behavior among adolescents: the role of peer effects.

    Mir M. Ali;Mir M. Ali;Aliaksandr Amialchuk;Frank W. Heiland

  • Prescription drug monitoring programs, nonmedical use of prescription drugs, and heroin use: Evidence from the National Survey of Drug Use and Health.

    Mir M. Ali;William N. Dowd;Timothy Classen;Ryan Mutter

  • Using social media to monitor mental health discussions - evidence from Twitter.

    Chandler McClellan;Mir M Ali;Ryan Mutter;Larry Kroutil

  • Body weight, self-perception and mental health outcomes among adolescents.

    Mir M Ali;Hai Fang;John A Rizzo

  • Post-Discharge Treatment Engagement Among Patients with an Opioid-Use Disorder.

    Sarah Naeger;Ryan Mutter;Mir M. Ali;Tami Leigh Mark

  • Adolescent propensity to engage in health risky behaviors: the role of individual resilience.

    Mir M. Ali;Debra S. Dwyer;Elizabeth A. Vanner;Alexander Lopez

  • The Role of Perceived Need and Health Insurance in Substance Use Treatment: Implications for the Affordable Care Act☆

    Mir M. Ali;Judith L. Teich;Ryan Mutter

  • Behavioral health treatment utilization among individuals with co-occurring opioid use disorder and mental illness: Evidence from a national survey.

    Priscilla Novak;Kenneth A. Feder;Mir M. Ali;Jie Chen

  • The Social Contagion Effect of Marijuana Use among Adolescents

    Mir M. Ali;Mir M. Ali;Aliaksandr Amialchuk;Debra S. Dwyer

  • Reasons for Not Seeking Substance Use Disorder Treatment: Variations by Health Insurance Coverage.

    Mir M Ali;Judith L Teich;Ryan Mutter

  • Substance use disorder treatment admissions and state-level prenatal substance use policies: Evidence from a national treatment database

    Katy B. Kozhimannil;William N. Dowd;Mir M. Ali;Priscilla Novak

  • Social Network and Weight Misperception among Adolescents

    Mir M. Ali;Aliaksandr Amialchuk;Francesco Renna

  • Big and Beautiful? Evidence of Racial Differences in the Perceived Attractiveness of Obese Females.

    Mir M. Ali;John A. Rizzo;Frank W. Heiland

  • The influence of body weight on social network ties among adolescents

    Mir M. Ali;Aliaksandr Amialchuk;John A. Rizzo

  • The Implications of the Affordable Care Act for Behavioral Health Services Utilization.

    Mir M. Ali;Judith Teich;Albert Woodward;Beth Han

  • Utilization of Mental Health Services by Veterans Living in Rural Areas.

    Judith Teich;Mir M. Ali;Sean Lynch;Ryan Mutter

  • Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act: Potential Changes in Receipt of Mental Health Treatment Among Low-Income Nonelderly Adults With Serious Mental Illness

    Beth Han;Joe Gfroerer;S. Janet Kuramoto;Mir Ali

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel I. Rees
Daniel I. Rees University of Colorado Denver
Samuel H. Zuvekas
Samuel H. Zuvekas Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Elizabeth J. Letourneau
Elizabeth J. Letourneau Johns Hopkins University
Colleen L. Barry
Colleen L. Barry Johns Hopkins University
Holly C. Wilcox
Holly C. Wilcox Johns Hopkins University
Alex H. Kral
Alex H. Kral RTI International
Elizabeth A. Stuart
Elizabeth A. Stuart Johns Hopkins University
Corey S. Davis
Corey S. Davis East Carolina University
Kosali Simon
Kosali Simon Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a degree in psychology can open the door to diverse and rewarding career options, both in clinical and non-clinical fields. One popular career pathway is to become a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), which requires specific educational and state licensing requirements. For example, in Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh mft education requirements focus on completing a master’s degree and supervised experience before obtaining licensure.

Prospective therapists in Texas can learn more about how to become an mft in Plano, including coursework, exams, and clinical practice. Similarly, those interested in Florida can review the mft requirements in Port St. Lucie for state-specific guidance.

Online psychology degrees also allow flexibility for students looking to pursue licensure in different states. If you’re planning to practice in Oregon, see the steps on how to become an mft in Portland. No matter where you live, understanding local requirements and selecting an accredited program is crucial to advancing your career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Mir M. Ali

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles